PDF herunterladen
Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2005; 7(5): 541-548
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-865855
Research Paper

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart KG · New York

Broom and Honeybees in Australia: An Alien Liaison

S. R. Simpson1 , C. L. Gross1 , L. X. Silberbauer1 , 2
  • 1Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
  • 2Current Address: Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: April 4, 2005

Accepted: June 21, 2005

Publikationsdatum:
15. September 2005 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Facilitative interactions between non-indigenous species are gaining recognition as a major driver of invasion success. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link (Fabaceae), or Scotch broom, is a cosmopolitan invasive shrub that lacks the capacity for vegetative reproduction and is a good model to study facilitative interactions. Its success in pioneer environments is determined by constraints on its reproduction. We determined whether pollinators were required for seed set in C. scoparius at Barrington Tops, NSW, Australia, where the species has infested ca. 14 000 ha across the plateau. Field and laboratory experiments showed that C. scoparius is an obligate outcrossing species at Barrington Tops. Monitoring of plants (10.7 h) showed that the flowers of C. scoparius have to be tripped to effect seed set and the only pollinator to do this was the introduced honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Most floral visits by honeybees result in fruit set (84 %) and because fruits have many ovules (10 - 18 per ovary) a single bee on an average foraging day can effect the production of over 6000 seeds. A review of C. scoparius pollination across four continents revealed major differences in pollen quantity, which may explain differences in the efficiencies of honeybees as pollinators of C. scoparius. The incorporation of pollinator management in an integrated approach for the control of C. scoparius is discussed.

Key words

Apis mellifera - Cytisus scoparius - invasional meltdown - mutualism - pollination.

References

  • 1 Baker H. G.. The evolution of weeds.  Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. (1974);  5 1-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Barthell J. F., Randall J. M., Thorp R. W., Wenner A. M.. Promotion of seed set in yellow star-thistle by honeybees: evidence of an invasive mutualism.  Ecological Applications. (2001);  11 1870-1883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Binggeli P.. A taxonomic, biogeographical and ecological overview of invasive woody plants.  Journal of Vegetation Science. (1996);  7 121-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Butz Huryn V. M., Moller H.. An assessment of the contribution of honey bees (Apis mellifera) to weed reproduction in New Zealand protected areas.  New Zealand Journal of Ecology. (1995);  19 111-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Butz Huryn V. M.. Ecological impacts of introduced honey bees.  The Quarterly Review of Biology. (1997);  72 275-297
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Carthew S. M., Whelan R. J., Ayre D. J.. Experimental confirmation of preferential outcrossing in Banksia. .  International Journal of Plant Science. (1996);  157 615-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cronk Q. C. B., Fuller J. L.. Plant Invaders. London; Chapman and Hall (1995)
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Cruden R. W.. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants.  Evolution. (1977);  31 32-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dafni A., Shmida A.. The possible ecological implications of the invasion of Bombus terrestris (L.) (Apidae) at Mt Carmel, Israel. Matheson, A., Buchmann, S. L., O'Toole, C., Westrich, P., and Williams, I. H., eds. The Conservation of Bees. London; Academic Press (1996): 183-200
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Darwin C.. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom. London; John Murray (1888) 164-165 360
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Davis M. A., Grime J. P., Thompson K.. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invisibility.  Journal of Ecology. (2000);  88 528-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 England P. R., Beynon F., Ayre D. J., Whelan R. J.. A molecular genetic assessment of mating-system variation in a naturally bird-pollinated shrub: contributions from birds and introduced honeybees.  Conservation Biology. (2001);  15 1645-1655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fogarty G., Facelli J. M.. Growth and competition of Cytisus scoparius, an invasive shrub, and Australian native shrubs.  Plant Ecology. (1999);  144 27-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fowler J., Cohen L., Jarvis P.. Practical Statistics for Field Biology. Chichester; John Wiley and Sons (1998)
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Goulson D.. Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems.  Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. (2003);  34 1-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gross C. L., Mackay D.. Honeybees reduce fitness in the pioneer shrub Melastoma affine (Melastomataceae).  Biological Conservation. (1998);  86 169-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Harper J. L.. Population Biology of Plants. London; Academic Press (1977)
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Hingston A. B., McQuillan P. B.. Does the recently introduced bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Apidae) threaten Australian ecosystems?.  Australian Journal of Ecology. (1998);  23 539-549
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hosking J. R., Smith J. M. B., Sheppard A. W.. The biology of Australian weeds 28. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link subsp. Scoparius. .  Plant Protection Quarterly. (1996);  11 102-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Johnstone I. M.. Plant invasion windows: A time-based classification of invasion potential.  Biological Review. (1986);  61 369-394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Knuth P.. Handbook of Flower Pollination, Vol. II: Observations on Flower Pollination Made in Europe and the Arctic Regions on Species Belonging to the Natural Orders. Oxford; Clarendon Press (1908)
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Krebs C. J.. Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 4th edn. New York; HarperCollins College Publishers (1994)
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Larson K. C., Fowler S. P., Walker J. C.. Lack of pollinators limits fruit set in the exotic Lonicera japonica. .  American Midland Naturalist. (2002);  148 54-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lazarides M., Cowley K., Hohnen P.. CSIRO Handbook of Australian Weeds. Collingwood, Australia; CSIRO (1997)
    Google Scholar
  • 25 McNeely J. A.. The great reshuffling: how alien species help feed the global community. Sandlund, O. T., Schei, P. J., and Viken, Å., eds. Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. The Netherlands; Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999): 11-31
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Moog U., Fiala B., Federle W., Maschwitz. Thrips pollination of the dioecious ant plant Macaranga hullettii (Euphorbiaceae) in Southeast Asia.  American Journal of Botany. (2002);  89 50-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Oldroyd B. P.. Controlling feral honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), populations in Australia: methodologies and costs.  Australian Journal of Entomology. (1998);  37 97-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pannell J. R., Barrett S. C. H.. Baker's Law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation.  Evolution. (1998);  52 657-668
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Parker I. M.. Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub.  Ecology. (1997);  78 1457-1470
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Parker I. M.. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach.  Ecological Applications. (2000);  10 726-743
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Parker I. M., Haubensak. A.. Comparative pollinator limitation of two non-native shrubs: do mutualisms influence invasions?.  Oecologia. (2002);  130 250-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Paynter Q., Downey P., Sheppard A. W.. Age structure and growth of the woody legume weed Cytisus scoparius in native and exotic habitats: implications for control.  Journal of Applied Ecology. (2003);  40 470-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Paton D. C.. Overview of feral and managed honeybees in Australia: distribution, abundance, extent of interactions with native biota, evidence of impacts and future research. Australian Nature Conservation Agency (1996)
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Ramsey M., Prakash N., Cairns S.. Breeding systems of disjunct populations of Christmas bells (Blandfordia grandiflora R. Br., Liliaceae): variation in self-fertility and an ovular mechanism regulating self-fertilisation.  Australian Journal of Botany. (1993);  41 35-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Rees M., Paynter Q.. Biological control of Scotch broom: modelling the determinants and abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores.  Journal of Applied Ecology. (1997);  34 1203-1221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Richardson D. M., Allsopp N., D'Antonio C. M., Milton S. J., Rejmánek M.. Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms.  Biological Review. (2000);  75 65-93
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Runions C. J., Geber M. A.. Evolution of the self-pollinating flower in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). I. Size and development of floral organs.  American Journal of Botany. (1994);  87 1439-1451
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schaffer W. M., Zeh D. W., Buchmann S. L., Kleinhans S., Schaffer M. V., Antrim J.. Competition for nectar between introduced honeybees and native north American bees and ants.  Ecology. (1983);  64 564-577
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Schroder M.. Scotch Broom Management Strategy/Works Program; Barrington Tops National Park/Pole Blue Crown Reserve. Hunter Region; NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (2001)
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Sheppard A. W., Hodge P., Paynter Q., Rees M.. Factors affecting invasion and persistence of broom Cytisus scoparius in Australia.  Journal of Applied Ecology. (2002);  39 721-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Simberloff D., Von Holle B.. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown?.  Biological Invasions. (1999);  1 21-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Simpson S.. he reproductive ecology of Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link (Fabaceae): an invasive weedy species infesting Barrington Tops NSW. Honours thesis. University of New England, Australia (2002)
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Sinden J., Randall J., Hester S., Odom D., Kalisch C., James R., Cacho O.. The Economic Impact of Weeds in Australia, Technical Series 8. CRC for Australian Weed Management. (2004)
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Smith J. M. B., Harlen R. L.. Preliminary observations on the seed dynamics of broom (Cytisus scoparius) at Barrington Tops, New South Wales.  Plant Protection Quarterly. (1991);  6 73-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Stenseth J. H.. How to control pest species: application of models from the theory of island biogeography in formulating pest control strategies.  Journal of Applied Ecology. (1981);  18 773-794
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Stout J. C.. Does size matter? Bumblebee behaviour and the pollination of Cytisus scoparius L. (Fabaceae).  Apidologie. (2000);  3 129-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Stout J. C., Kells A. R., Goulson D.. Pollination of the invasive exotic shrub Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae) by introduced bees in Tasmania.  Biological Conservation. (2002);  106 425-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Suzuki N.. Significance of flower exploding pollination on the reproduction of the scotch broom, Cytisus scoparius (Leguminosae).  Ecological Research. (2003);  18 523-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Vaughton G.. Pollination and seed set of Banksia spinulosa: evidence for autogamy.  Australian Journal of Botany. (1988);  36 633-642
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Vitousek P. M., Antonio C. M., Loope L. L., Rejmánek M., Westbrooks R.. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change.  New Zealand Journal of Botany. (1997);  21 1-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Waites A. R., Agren J.. Pollinator visitation, stigmatic pollen loads and among-population variation in seed set in Lythrum salicaria. .  Journal of Ecology,. (2004);  92 (3) 512-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Waterhouse B. M.. Broom (Cytisus scoparius) at Barrington Tops, New South Wales.  Australian Geographical Studies. (1988);  26 239-248
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Yeo P. F.. Secondary pollen presentation. Form, function and evolution.  Plant Systematics and Evolution. (1993);  Suppl. 6 1-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

S. R. Simpson

Department of Ecosystem Management
University of New England

Armidale, NSW 2350

Australia

eMail: ssimpson@une.edu.au

Editor: S. S. Renner

      >