Increasing Vessel Diameter with the Open Y Technique for Diameter Discrepancy

ABSTRACT

Free tissue transfers have increasingly become the mainstay of plastic surgery for the last two decades. Size discrepancy between the vessels in microsurgery is frequently encountered in clinical practice and may potentially be an important factor in the patency of the anastomosis. A rat model has been devised to improve the diameter discrepancy in microvascular anastomosis. Twenty Wistar rats have been used for this purpose. The external jugular vein was cut 1 mm distally from the bifurcation of the anterior and posterior facial veins. Both legs of the resultant Y-shaped vessel were united after inserting microscissors from one leg and exiting from the other. Performing an end-to-end anastomosis between the vein, which acquired an increased diameter as a result of this procedure, and the carotid artery prepared in the neck, helped to create an arteriovenous shunt. Patency was assessed in the operated rats 2 weeks later. In order to achieve a better understanding of the advantages of this technique, another study was carried out. In this subsequent study, specimens were collected from fresh sheep cadavers, including the brachiocephalic trunk, right common carotid, and right subclavian arteries. Different specimens were compared from each of the vessels and also from each of the subclavian and carotid arteries after they were joined together with the open Y technique and increased diameters of the vessels are obtained. As a result, the authors demonstrated that size discrepancy between the vessels was decreased, patency with a percentage of 94.1 was obtained, and when specimens from the fresh cadavers were evaluated, a reasonable gain was achieved. (p < 0.0001)

KEYWORDS

Vessel discrepancy - open Y - microsurgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Hamilton R B, O'Brien B M. An experimental study of microvascular patency using a continuous suture technique.  Br J Plast Surg. 1979;  32 153-154
• 2 Fried M P, Caminear D S, Sloman-Moll E R. The efficacy of absorbable suture for microvascular anastomosis.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;  116 1051-1054
• 3 Zhang F, Lineaweaver W C, Buntic R, Walker R. Mechanical evaluation of anastomotic tension and patency in arteries.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996;  12 121-126
• 4 Wray R C, O'Brien B M. The effects of suturing technique and vessel size on patency after microarterial repair.  Ann Plast Surg. 1979;  2 233-234
• 5 Ahn C Y, Borud L J, Shaw W W. Analysis of suturing techniques in the microvascular anastomosis of vessels of unequal diameter.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 469-473
• 6 Harashina T, Irigaray A. Expansion of smaller vessel diameter by fish-mouth incision in microvascular anastomosis with marked size discrepancy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;  65 502-503
• 7 Monsivais J J. Microvascular grafts: effect of diameter discrepancy on patency rates.  Microsurgery. 1990;  11 285-287
• 8 Zhang F, Oliva A, Kao S D, Newlin L, Buncke H J. Microvascular vein grafts in the rat cutaneous free-flap model.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1994;  10 229-233
• 9 Crowell R M, Yasargil M G. Experimental microvascular autografting. Technical note.  J Neurosurg. 1969;  31 101-104
• 10 Ryan A D, Goldberg I, O'Brien B M, MacLeod A M. Anastomosis of vessels of unequal diameter using an interpositional vein graft.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  81 414-417
• 11 Gumley G J, Hamilton G L, MacLeod A M, O'Brien B M. An assessment of different types of anastomosis with significant vessel disproportion using thin-walled interposition vein grafts.  Br J Plast Surg. 1989;  42 534-537
• 12 Harris J R, Seikaly H, Calhoun K, Daugherty E. Effect of diameter of microvascular interposition vein grafts on vessel patency and free flap survival in the rat model.  J Otolaryngol. 1999;  28 152-157
• 13 Lopez-Monjardin H, de la Pena-Salcedo J A. Techniques for management of size discrepancies in microvascular anastomosis.  Microsurgery. 2000;  20 162-166
• 14 Yuksel E, Safak T, Ozcan G, Kecik A, Shenaq S M. Perioperative dilation for vessel-size discrepancy using a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty catheter.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1999;  15 31-35
• 15 Xiu Z F, Song Y G. A new technique to anastomose vessels with great discrepancy in diameter.  Br J Plast Surg. 1993;  46 619-620
• 16 de la Pena-Salcedo J A, Cuesy C, Lopez-Monjardin H. Experimental microvascular sleeve anastomosis in size discrepancy vessels.  Microsurgery. 2000;  20 173-175
• 17 Ueda K, Harashina T, Inoue T, Kurihara T, Harada T, Oba S. Microarterial anastomosis with a distal tapering technique.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1994;  10 87-90
• 18 Godina M. Preferential use of end-to-side arterial anastomoses in free flap transfers.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;  64 673-682
• 19 Bas L, May Jr J W, Handren J, Fallon J. End-to-end versus end-to-side microvascular anastomosis patency in experimental venous repairs.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;  77 442-450
• 20 Brennen M D, O'Brien B M. Patency rates in end to side anastomoses in the rabbit.  Br J Plast Surg. 1979;  32 24-30
• 21 Lauritzen C. A new and easier way to anastomose microvessels. An experimental study in rats.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;  12 291-294
• 22 Nakayama Y, Soeda S, Iino T, Uchida A. Is the sleeve anastomosis a risky technique?.  Br J Plast Surg. 1987;  40 288-294
• 23 de la Pena-Salcedo J A, Lopez-Monjardin H. Sleeve anastomosis in head and neck reconstruction.  Microsurgery. 2000;  20 193-194
• 24 Karl P, Tilgner A, Heiner H. A new adhesive technique for microvascular anastomoses: a preliminary report.  Br J Plast Surg. 1981;  34 61-63
• 25 Casanova R, Herrera G A, Vasconez Engels B, Velasquez C, Grotting J C. Microarterial sutureless sleeve anastomosis using a polymeric adhesive: an experimental study.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1987;  3 201-210
• 26 Li Y N, Wood M B. End-to-side-anastomosis in the dog using the 3M precise microvascular anastomotic system: a comparative study.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1991;  7 345-50 , discussion 351-352
• 27 Ahn C Y, Shaw W W, Berns S, Markowitz B L. Clinical experience with the 3M microvascular coupling anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93 1481-1484
• 28 O'Brien B M, Haw C, Kubo T, Gilbert A, Hayhurst J W. Microvenous grafting of small vein defects.  Br J Plast Surg. 1979;  32 164-166
• 29 Biemer E. Vein grafts in microvascular surgery.  Br J Plast Surg. 1977;  30 197-199
• 30 Miller M J, Schusterman M A, Reece G P, Kroll S S. Interposition vein grafting in head and neck reconstructive microsurgery.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1993;  9 245-51; , discussion 251-252
• 31 Rooks M D, Gould J S, Masear V, Powell 3rd J H, Gould S. Effects of venous hypertension on rabbit free flap survival.  Microsurgery. 1991;  12 253-261
• 32 Sasmor M T, Reus W F, Straker D J, Colen L B. Vascular resistance considerations in free-tissue transfer.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1992;  8 195-200
• 33 Nystrom A, Hanel D P, Scheker L, Schwartz K S, Lister G D. Free flap circulation and modes of arterial insertion: an experimental study.  Microsurgery. 1990;  11 265-267
• 34 O'Brien B M, Morrison W A, Gumley G J. Principles and techniques of microvascular surgery. In: McCarthy JG Plastic Surgery Philadelphia; WB Saunders 1990: 443
• 35 Germann G, Steinau H U. The clinical reliability of vein grafts in free flap transfer.  J. Reconstr Microsurg. 1996;  12 11-17
• 36 Moss S H, Schwartz K S, von Drasek-Ascher G, Ogden 2nd L L, Wheeler C S, Lister G D. Digital venous anatomy.  J Hand Surg. 1985;  10 473-482
• 37 Boeckx W, Lorenzi F D, Hulst R. Increasing the flow output by Y-shaped microvascular anastomosis.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;  18 381-386