Endoscopy 2004; 36 - 20
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825002

Analysis of Clinicopathological Factors Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Oesophageal Cancer

M MacGuill 1, E Mulligan 1, N Ravi 1, JV Reynolds 1
  • 1Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St James's Hospital, Dublin

Multimodality therapy comprising neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy prior to radical resection is increasingly utilised in oesophageal cancer. The achievement of a complete pathological response (pCR) or a major response is associated with an improved survival. Between 50 and 70% of patients, however, show no response to the neoadjuvant regimen and accordingly the identification of factors which predict a response to chemoradiotherapy would be of considerable clinical benefit. We investigated the following clinicopathological factors: demographics, social history, clinical history, tumour type, site, size, morphology and differentiation.

158 patients were identified who had undergone neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy at this institution between January 1990 and August 2003. A complete pathological response was seen in 36 cases (23%). Statistical Analysis was performed using Chi-squares with Pearson's test, or Kruskal-Wallis test.

There was a significant relationship between response to chemoradiotherapy and pre-treatment tumour length. The median tumour length in the pCR group was 2cm (1–2.8cm) compared with 3cm (2–7cm) in the non-responders (p<0.05). A pCR response also occurred significantly more frequently amongst squamous cell carcinomas (41%) compared to adenocarcinomas (21%) (p<0.05). Other factors were not predictive of response.

The important observation in this study is that smaller tumours are predictive of a greater response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. This may reflect different tumour biology, perhaps with acquired resistance to treatment-induced apoptosis in the larger tumours. A simpler explanation is that the existing dose and treatment schedule for combination chemoradiotherapy is sub-optimal in patients with larger tumours. Both these hypotheses require further evaluation.