Effektivität der Rückenschule für Erwachsene

Zusammenfassung

Im Anschluss an die Definition der Rückenschule wird ihre Entwicklung beschrieben.

Von den 32 in Medline gefundenen Arbeiten berichteten 23 von positiver, 5 von negativer und 4 von unklarer Wirkung der Rückenschule für Erwachsene. Von 5 Leitlinien zur Behandlung lumbaler Rückenschmerzen empfehlen 2 die Rückenschule, 3 erwähnen sie nicht. 3 deutsche Fachbücher der Orthopädie befürworten sie und 1 englisches gibt keine klare Aussage.

Im Vergleich ist die Unterrichtsdauer bei Rückenschulstudien mit negativer Wirkung kürzer als bei denen mit positiver Wirkung. Die unterschiedlichen Untersuchungszeiträume und Messparameter erschweren eine Vergleichbarkeit zwischen den Studien.

Verschiedene Aspekte der Rückenschule werden diskutiert und für künftige Forschung Empfehlungen zu Studiendesign, Messparameter und -zeitraum, Gestaltung und Inhalte der Rückenschule gegeben.

Die Erstellung von Leitlinien für die Durchführung von Rückenschulen stellt eine dringende Notwendigkeit zur Verbesserung des praktischen Handelns dar, die der Erforschung langfristiger Wirkungen der Rückenschule vorausgehen sollte.

Abstract

Following the definition of back school its development is described.

Of the 32 articles found in Medline 23 show positive, 5 negative and 4 unclear effects of back school for adults. Of 5 guidelines for the treatment of low back pain 2 recommend back school and 3 do not mention it. 3 German orthopaedic textbooks support it and 1 English book does not give a clear statement.

In comparison the length of the back school with negative effects is shorter than those with positive effects. The differing length of described back schools and the varying measurement parameters between used in the studies make comparison difficult.

Various aspects of back school are discussed. Suggestions for future research concerning study design, measurement parameters and duration as well as design and contents of back schools are given.

The compilation of guidelines for the performance of back schools is urgently necessary in order to improve clinical practice, which must precede research of long term effects of back schools.

Schlüsselwörter

Rückenschule - Effektivität

Key words

Back school - effectivity

Literatur

• 1 Assendelft W JJ, Morton S C, Yu E I. et al . Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain. A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness Relative to Other Therapies.  Annals of Internal Medecine. 2003;  138 871 - 881 u. E888 - E900
• 2 Atlas S J, Nardin R A. Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: An evidence-based approach to clinical care.  Muscle Nerve. 2003;  27 265-284
• 3 Bendix A F, Bendix T, Lund C. et al . Comparison of three intensive programs for chronic low back pain patients: a prospective, randomized, observerblindet study wiht one-year follow-up.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;  29 (2) 81-89
• 4 Bergquist-Ullman M, Larsson U. Acute Low Back Pain in Industry. A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors.  Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1977;  Supp. 170 1-117
• 5 Berwick D M, Budman S, Feldstein M. No clinical effect of back schools in an HMO. A randomized prospective trial.  Spine. 1989;  14 338-344
• 6 Biering-Sørensen F. Physical Measurements as Risk Indicators for Low-back Trouble Over a One-Year Period.  Spine. 1984;  9 106-119
• 7 Czolbe A. Rückenschulen - Gestern, heute und morgen. Funktionskrankheiten des Bewegungsapparates.  1993;  6 19-25
• 8 Daltroy L H, Iversen M D, Larson M G. et al . A controlled trial of an educational program to prevent low back injuries.  The New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;  337 322-328
• 9 Debrunner A M. Orthopädie, Orthopädische Chirurgie. Die Störungen des Bewegungsapparates in Klinik und Praxis. Bern; Huber 1995
• 10 Derebery V J, Giang G M, Saracino G. et al . Evaluation of the Impact of a Low Back Pain Educational Intervention of Physician’s Practice Patterns and Patients’ Outcomes.  J Occup Environ Med. 2002;  44 (10) 977-984
• 11 Deutsch F E. Isolated lumbar strengthening in the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain.  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1996;  19 124-133
• 12 Di Fabio R P. Efficacy of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Programs and Back School for Patients with Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis.  Physical Therapy. 1995;  75 865-878
• 13 Donchin M, Woolf O, Kaplan L. et al . Secondary prevention of low-back pain. A clinical trial.  Spine. 1990;  15 1317-1320
• 14 Donelson R, Grand W, Kamps C. et al . Pain Response to Sagittal End-Range Spinal Motion. A Prospective, Randomized, Multicentered Trial.  Spine. 1991;  Suppl. 16 206-212
• 15 Engel G L. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedical science.  Science. 1977;  196 129-136
• 16 Ferreira P H, Ferreira M L, Maher C G. et al . Effect of applying different „levels of evidence” criteria on conclusions of Cochrane reviews of interventions for low back pain.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002;  55 1126-1129
• 17 Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S. et al . Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope - if we can just get all the players onside.  Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1998;  16 1625-1631
• 18 Frost H, Klaber M offett JA, Moser J S. et al . Randomised controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain.  British Medical Journal. 1995;  310 151-154
• 19 Gerster J C. Le traitement médical de la lombalgie selon les principes de la médecine fondée sur les preuves.  Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 2000;  89 619-623
• 20 Gifford L S, Butler D S. The Integration of Pain Sciences into Clinical Practice.  Journal of Hand Therapy. 1997;  3 86-95
• 21 Gifford L. The „central” mechanisms. Gifford L Topical Issues in Pain Kestrel/UK; NOI Press 1998
• 22 Glomsrød B, Lønn J H, Soukup M G. et al . „Active Back School” - Prophylactic Management for Low Back Pain: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial.  Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2001;  33 26-30
• 23 Harris G R, Susman J L. Managing musculoskeletal complaints with rehabilitation therapy: Summary of the Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on musculoskeletal rehabilitation interventions.  The Journal of Family Practice. 2002;  51 1042-1046
• 24 Hides J A, Jull G A, Richardson C A. Long-term Effects of Specific Stabilising Exercises for First Episode Low Back Pain.  Spine. 2001;  26 E243-E248
• 25 Hochschuler S H, Cotler H B, Guyer R D. Rehabilitation of the Spine - Science and Practice. St. Louis; Mosby Year Book 1993
• 26 Hodselmans A P, Jaegers S M, Goeken L N. Short-term outcomes of a back school program for chronic low back pain.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 1099-1105
• 27 Hsieh C Y, Adams A H, Tobis J. et al . Effectiveness of four conservative treatments for subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.  Spine. 2002;  27 1142-1148
• 28 Karas B E, Conrad K M. Back injury prevention interventions in the workplace: an integrative review.  AAOHN Journal. 1996;  44 189-196
• 29 Keijsers J F, Groenman N H, Gerards F M. et al . A back school in The Netherlands: evaluating the results.  Patient Education and Counselling. 1989;  14 31-44
• 30 Kendall N, Watson P. Identifying psychosocial yellow flags and modifying management. Gifford L Topical Issues in Pain 2 - Biopsychosocial assessment and management, Relationships and pain. Physiotherapy Pain Association Yearbook Falmouth; CNS Press 2000
• 31 Klaber M offett JA, Chase S M, Portek I. et al . A controlled, prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low back pain.  Spine. 1986;  11 120-122
• 32 Koes B W, van Tulder M W, van der Windt D AWM. et al . The efficacy of back schools: a review of randomized clinical trials.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1994;  47 851-862
• 33 Krämer J. Orthopädie. Berlin; Springer 1996
• 34 Laser T. Lumbale Bandscheibenleiden. München; Zuckschwerdt 1994
• 35 Leclaire R, Esdaile J M, Suissa S. et al . Back school in a first episode of compensated acute low back pain: a clinical trial to assess efficacy and prevent relapse.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;  77 673-679
• 36 Lindström I, Öhlund C, Eek C. et al . The Effect of Graded Activity on Patients with Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study with an Operant-Conditioning Behavioral Approach.  Physical Therapy. 1992;  72 279-293
• 37 Lønn J H, Glomsrød B, Soukup M G. et al . Active Back School: Prophylactic Management for Low Back Pain.  Spine. 1999;  24 865-871
• 38 Maier-Riehle B, Harter M. The effects of back schools - a meta-analysis.  International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2001;  24 199-206
• 39 McGuirk B, King W, Govind J. et al . Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care.  Spine. 2001;  26 2615-2622
• 40 Melzack R, Wall P D. Pain mechanisms: a new theory.  science. 1965;  150 971-979
• 41 Moog M, Zusman M. Von der „Mobilisation” zur Funktion - Anwendung kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutischer Strategien als Erweiterung des manualtherapeutischen Behandlungskonzepts für subakute und chronische Schmerzpatienten.  Manuelle Therapie. 2001;  5 67-73
• 42 Moore A, Cupit R. The Manual Therapist as an Educator. Editorial.  Manual Therapy. 2001;  6 1-2
• 43 Nentwig C G. Effektivität der Rückenschule. Ein Überblick über die Ergebnisse der evidenz-basierten Evaluation.  Der Orthopäde. 1999;  28 958-965
• 44 Nentwig C G. Evidenz-basierte Evaluation der Rückenschule - Weite Verbreitung bei geringer Wirksamkeit?.  Z Orthopädie. 1999;  137 Oa1-Oa3
• 45 Nielson W R, Weir R. Biopsychosocial approaches to the treatment of chronic pain.  The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2001;  Suppl. 17 S114-S127
• 46 Niesten-Dietrich U. Effektivität von Rückenschulkonzepten. Ein Literaturüberblick.  Gesundheitssport und Sporttherapie. 1999;  15 114-118
• 47 Niethard F, Pfeil J. Orthopädie. Stuttgart; Thieme 2003
• 48 Östgaard H C, Zetherström G, Roos-Hansson E. et al . Reduction of Back and Posterior Pelvic Pain in Pregnancy.  Spine. 1994;  19 894-900
• 49 Penttinnen J, Nevala-Puranen N, Airaksinen O. et al . Randomized controlled trial of back school with and without peer support.  J Occup Rehab, 12 (1), . 2002;  21-29
• 50 Philadelphia Panel . Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, Guidelines on Selected Rehabilitation Interventions for Low Back Pain.  Physical Therapy. 2001;  81 1641-1674
• 51 Pincus T, Vlaeyen J W, Kendall N A. et al . Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychosocial factors in low back pain: directions for the future.  Spine. 2002;  27 E133-E138
• 52 Poiraudeau S, Lefèvre-Colau M M, Mayoux-Benhamou M A. et al . Quelle rééducation pour quel lombalgique?.  La revue du practicien. 2000;  50 1779-1783
• 53 Quittan M. Management of back pain.  Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002;  24 423-434
• 54 Revel M. Rehabilitation of low back pain patients. A review.  Revue du Rhumatisme (English Edition). 1995;  62 35-44
• 55 Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P. et al .Therapeutic Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilization in Low Back Pain. Scientific Basis and Clinical Approach. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1999
• 56 Scheer S J, Radack K L, O’Brien J r DR. Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1: Acute interventions.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;  76 966-973
• 57 Schenk R J, Doran R L, Stachura J J. Learning effects of a back education program.  Spine. 1996;  21 2183-2188
• 58 Sirles A T, Brown K, Hilyer J C. Effects of back school education and exercise in back injured municipal workers.  AAOHN Journal. 1991;  39 7-12
• 59 Stankovic R, Johnell O. Conservative treatment of acute low back pain, A Prospective Randomized Trial: McKenzie Method of Treatment versus Patient Education in „Mini Back School”.  Spine. 1990;  15 120-123
• 60 Stankovic R, Johnell O. Conservative treatment of acute low back pain. A 5-year follow-up study of two methods of treatment.  Spine. 1995;  20 469-472
• 61 Turner J A. Educational and behavioral interventions for back pain in primary care.  Spine. 1996;  21 2851-2857
• 62 Versloot J M, Rozeman A, van Son A M. et al . The cost-effectiveness of a back school program in industry. A longitudinal controlled field study.  Spine. 1992;  17 22-27
• 63 Vester F. Denken, Lernen, Vergessen. München; dtv 1996
• 64 Waddell G. The Back Pain Revolution. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1998
• 65 Waddell G, Burton A K. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review.  Occup Med (Lond). 2001;  51 124-135
• 66 van der Weide W E, Verbeek J H, van Tulder M W. Vocational outcome of intervention for low-back pain.  Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;  23 165-178
• 67 Youdas J W, Garrett T R, Egan K S. et al . Lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination in adults with chronic low back pain.  Phys Ther. 2000;  80 261-275
• 68 Zachrisson-Forssell M. The Swedish Back School.  Physiotherapy. 1980;  66 112-114
• 69 Zachrisson-Forssell M. The Back School.  Spine. 1981;  6 104-106