Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2003; 20(8): 441-446
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-45389
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Trends in the NICU: A Review of 25 Years' Experience

Francesca A. M. Tatad, William W. Frayer
  • Perinatology Center, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 January 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

A review of 25,448 admissions was performed to evaluate the progress of neonatal intensive care at Weill Cornell Medical Center since 1978. Patients were identified by a review of admission and discharge data compiled by admitting staff. The following data were collected: birth weight, gestational age, place of birth (inborn versus outborn), discharge date, disposition. Length of stay was computed from these data. Data were organized according to year of admission. Admissions remained relatively constant with time. However the percentage of inborn infants steadily increased. Survival of the smallest infants (<600 g) remained poor, but overall survival of all infants improved over time. Length of stay for infants 1000 to 2000 g fell over time while that of other infants remained constant. These trends reflect changes in obstetric and neonatal practice over time, and include improved methods of antenatal care, neonatal pulmonary care, and nutrition, as well as changes in the distribution of neonatal and high-risk maternal care.

KEYWORDS

Premature infant - mortality - neonatal care - neonatal intensive care unit

REFERENCES

  • 1 Lussky R. A century of neonatal medicine.  Minn Med . 1999;  82 48-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stahlman M T. Newborn intensive care: success or failure?.  J Pediatr . 1984;  105 162-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schwartz R M, Luby A, Scanlon J, Kellogg R. Effect of surfactant on the morbidity, mortality and resource use in newborn infants weighing 500-1500 g.  N Engl J Med . 1994;  330 1476-1480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hamvas A, Wise P, Yang R. et al . The influence of the wider use of surfactant therapy on neonatal mortality among blacks and whites.  N Engl J Med . 1996;  334 1635-1641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Schechner S. For the 1980s: how small is too small?.  Clin Perinatol . 1980;  7 135-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Walker E M, Patel N B. Mortality and morbidity in infants born between 20 and 28 weeks gestation.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol . 1987;  94 670-674
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hack M, Fanaroff A. Outcomes of extremely immature infants: a perinatal dilemma.  N Engl J Med . 1993;  329 1649-1650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ballabh P, Kumari J, AlKouatly H B. et al . Neonatal outcome of triplet versus twin and singleton pregnancies: a matched case control study.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 2003;  107 28-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fanaroff A, Poole K, Duara S. et al .Micronates: 401-500 grams: the NICHD Neonatal Research Network Experience 1996-2001. Unpublished data.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hack M, Friedman H, Fanaroff A. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants.  Pediatrics . 1996;  98 931-937
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hack M, Fanaroff A. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants between 1982 and 1988.  N Engl J Med . 1989;  321 1642-1647
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hack M, Horbar J, Malloy M. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network.  Pediatrics . 1991;  87 587-597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
      >