Endoscopy 2003; 35(9): 778-780
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41589
Kos Symposium
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Recommendations of the ESGE Workshop on the Ethics of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Placement for Nutritional Support

First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003A.  Kruse, J.  J.  Misiewicz, T.  Rokkas, H.  Hammer, Y.  Niv, M.  Allison, E.  Kouroumalis, D.  Campbell
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 August 2003 (online)

Introduction

The panel met for discussion of the issues during the course of the First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, June 27 - 30 2002, in Kos, Greece. The agreed conclusions were further debated and commented upon during the Plenary Session of the symposium. The points described below are to be regarded as preliminary. They should not be taken as guidelines, nor as firm recommendations concerning endoscopic practice. The ethical principles governing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement need to be further refined and adapted to codes of practice obtaining in individual countries. In the future, note will also have to be taken of any European Union (EU) directives that might affect EU member countries.

The panel felt that the practice and ethics of PEG placement was fundamentally affected by a number of general issues. Clinical issues are of obvious and essential importance, but PEG placement is also influenced by other factors that include ethical, socioeconomic, cultural, and legal considerations.

References

  • 1 Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donelly M T. et al . A randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and naso-gastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke.  BMJ. 1996;  312 13-16
  • 2 Park R HR, Allison M C, Lang J. et al . Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia.  BMJ. 1992;  304 1406-1409
  • 3 Van Rosendaal G MA, Verhoef M J, Kinsella T D. How are decisions made about the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for long-term nutritional support?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 3225-3228
  • 4 Sanders D S, Carter M J, D’Silva J. et al . Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 1472-1475
  • 5 Gillick M R. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 206-210
  • 6 Fay D E, Poplausky M, Gruber M. et al . Long-term enteral feeding: a retrospective comparison of delivery via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasoenteric tubes.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 1604-1609
  • 7 Abuksis G, Mor M, Niv Y. et al . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: high mortality in hospitalized patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 128-132

J. J. Misiewicz, FRCP · Hon. Joint Director 

Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition · Central Middlesex Hospital

Acton Lane · London NW10 7NS · United Kingdom

Fax: +44-20-89611317 ·

Email: misiewicz@dial.pipex.com

    >