Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2002; 16(2): 157-162
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32255
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Tumescent Liposuction Evolution: A Revolution in Technique

Rodney B. Young III1 2 , Stephen M. Paulsen1
  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • 2Palmetto Plastic Surgery, Charlestown, SC
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 June 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The tumescent technique for local anesthesia by direct infiltration of large volumes of dilute anesthetic solution has popularized liposuction worldwide. This significant innovation has allowed surgeons to remove large volumes of fat safely without general anesthesia and without significant blood loss. Over the past 7 years, we have used true tumescent technique on 841 patients with minimal complications. The overwhelming majority of the procedures were performed with mild sedation. As the procedure evolved, we have modified our technique and are confident in its safety and efficacy.

KEYWORDS

Tumescence - liposuction - sedation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Coleman W P. The tumescent technique.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  101 1751-1753
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rohrich R J, Beran S J, Fodor P B. The role of subcutaneous infiltration in suction-assisted lipoplasty: a review.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1997;  99 514-526
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Amland S F, Bugge J F. Blood loss during liposuction using the tumescent technique.  Aesth Plast Surg . 1994;  18 157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Klein J A. Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol . 1990;  16 248-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hunstad J P. Large-volume tumescent liposuction.  Aesth Surg J . 1995;  15 14-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Giese S Y, Bulan E J, Commons G W, Spears S L, Yanovski J A. Improvements in cardiovascular risk profile with large-volume liposuction: a pilot study.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2001;  108 510-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Talmor M, Fahey T J, Wise J, Hoffman L A, Barie P S. Large-volume liposuction complicated by retroperitoneal hemorrhage: management principles and implications for the quality improvement process.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2000;  105 2244-2250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hanke C W, Bernstein G, Bullock S. Safety of tumescent liposuction in 15,336 patients.  Dermatol Surg . 1995;  21 459-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Teimourian B, Rogers W B. A national survey of complications associated with suction lipectomy: a comparative study.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1989;  84 628-631
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dillerud E. Suction lipoplasty: a report on complications, undesired results, and patient satisfaction based on 3511 procedures.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1991;  88 239-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
      >