Role of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Advantages of Moderate Skin and Subcutaneous Thickness

ABSTRACT

Skin-flap thickness is an important consideration when choosing a free flap for head and neck reconstruction. The anterolateral thigh flap, the rectus abdominis flap, and the radial forearm flap, which included the epidermis, the dermal, and the subcutaneous layers, were measured using ultrasonography in 31 patients. The mean skin and subcutaneous thickness of the anterolateral thigh flap was 7.1 mm; the rectus abdominis flap was 13.7 mm; and the radial forearm flap was 2.1 mm. Further analysis revealed a statistically significant difference among the skin and subcutaneous thickness of the three flap groups. Of the 44 anterolateral thigh flap transfers done for head and neck reconstruction after cancer ablative surgery, 41 (93.2 percent) were transferred successfully.

The anterolateral thigh flap creates a moderately thick skin flap, and is less variable in thickness across its area than is the rectus abdominis flap. The flap is adaptable for reconstruction of head and neck soft-tissue defects.

KEYWORDS

Anterolateral thigh flap - head and neck soft-tissue defects - post-cancer ablative surgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Koshima I, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  92 421-28
• 2 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S. Versatility of the free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1997;  123 1325-31
• 3 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  102 1517-23
• 4 Shieh S J, Chin H Y, Yu J C. Free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects following cancer ablation.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2000;  105 2349-57
• 5 Jacobson M C, Franssen E, Fliss D M. Free forearm flap in oral reconstruction: functional outcome.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1995;  121 959-64
• 6 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Yamada A. Versatility of a free inferior rectus abdominis flap for head and neck reconstruction: analysis of 200 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1994;  93 762-69
• 7 Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S. Free thin paraumbilical perforator-based flaps.  Ann Plast Surg . 1992;  29 12-17
• 8 Akizuki T, Harii K, Yamada A. Extremely thinned inferior rectus abdominis free flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  91 936-41
• 9 Kimura N, Satoh K. Consideration of a thin flap as an entity and clinical applications of the thin anterolateral thigh flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1996;  97 985-92
• 10 Miller M J, Reece G P, Marchi M. Lateral thigh free flap in head and neck reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1995;  96 334-40
• 11 Shimizu T, Fisher D R, Carmichael S W. An anatomic comparison of septocutaneous free flaps from the thigh region.  Ann Plast Surg . 1997;  38 604-10
• 12 Balta P, Ward M, Tomkins A. Ultrasound for measurement of subcutaneous fat.  Lancet . 1981;  1 504-5
• 13 Weiss L W, Clark F C. Ultrasonic protocols for separately measuring subcutaneous fat and skeletal muscle thickness in the calf area.  Phys Ther . 1985;  65 477-81
• 14 Salmi A, Tukiainen E, Harma M. A prospective study of chages in muscle dimensions following free-muscle transfer measured by ultrasound and CT scanning.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1996;  97 1443-50
• 15 Urken M L, Biller H F. A new bilobed design for the sensate radial forearm flap to preserve tongue mobility following significant glossectomy.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1994;  120 26-31