Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 50(1): 21-24
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20159
Original Cardiovascular
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Mid-Term Results of Aortic Valve Preservation: Remodelling vs. Reimplantation

T.  P.  Graeter, D.  Aicher, F.  Langer, O.  Wendler, H.-J.  Schäfers
  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospitals, Homburg (Saar), Germany
Further Information

Publication History

February 21, 2001

Publication Date:
15 February 2002 (online)

Abstract

Objective: Valve-preserving root replacement has become an accepted alternative to composite replacement both in dissection and in aneurysmal disease. We retrospectively analysed 5-year results comparing root remodelling and reimplantation procedures. Methods: From October 1995 to January 2001, 119 patients underwent either root remodelling (group A; n = 98; age: 61 ± 14 years) or valve reimplantation within a vascular graft (group B; n = 21; age: 47 ± 17 years). In group A, 26 patients were operated for aortic dissection type A and 72 for aortic valve regurgitation and aneurysmal disease. In group B, 8 patients were operated for aortic dissection type A, 13 for aortic valve regurgitation and aneurysm. Concomitant arch surgery was performed in 65 patients (group A: 57; group B: 8). Results: Time on cardiopulmonary bypass was 121 ± 30 min in group A, 143 ± 24 min in group B, and aortic cross-clamp time was 87 ± 19 min in group A and 113 ± 24 minin group B. Average duration was therefore longer in group B (p = n.s.) Hospital mortality was 3.1 % in group A and 0 % in group B. Following elective procedures, hospital mortality was 1.1 % in group A. Freedom from aortic regurgitation over grade 2 at 4 years was 86 % in group A and 94.7 % in group B. At 4 years, freedom from proximal reoperation was 97.8 % in group A and 100 % in group B. There was no deterioration of valve function or need for reoperation observed after 1 year in either group. Conclusion: Five-year results are comparable and encouraging for remodelling and reimplantation procedures. If the initial valve function and geometry is adequate, the chance of secondary failure beyond the first year is minimal.

References

  • 1 Bachet J, Termingnon J L, Goutot B, Dreyfus G, Piquois A, Brodaty D, Dubois C, Delentdecker P, Guilmet D. Aortic root replacement with a composite graft. Factors influencing immediate and long-term results.  Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg.. 1996;  10 ((3)) 207-213
  • 2 Gott V L, Gillinov A M, Pyeritz R E, Cameron D E, Reitz B A, Greene P S, Stone C D, Ferris R L, Alejo D E, McKusick V A. Aortic root replacement. Risk factor analysis of a seventeen-year experience with 270 patients.  J Thorac Cardiovsc Surg. 1995;  109 536-544
  • 3 David T E, Feindel C F. An aortic valve sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  103 617-622
  • 4 Sarsam M A, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic valve annulus.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;  105 435-438
  • 5 Graeter T, Kindermann M, Fries R, Langer F, Schäfers H J. Comparison of aortic valve gradient during exercise after aortic valve reconstruction.  Chest. 2000;  118 1271-1277
  • 6 David T E, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Webb G D. Aortic valve sparing operations: an update.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 1840-1842
  • 7 Horstkotte D, Schulte H, Bircks W, Strauer B. Unexpected findings concerning thromboembolic complications and anticoagulation after complete 10 year follow-up of patients with St. Jude medical prostheses.  J Heart Valve Dis. 1993;  2 291-301
  • 8 David T E. Remodeling the aortic root and preservation of the native aortic valve Operative techniques in cardiac and thoracic surgery.  J Thorac Cardisvasc Surg. 1996;  1 44-56
  • 9 Schäfers H J, Fries R, Langer F, Nikoloudakis N, Graeter T, Grundmann U. Valve preserving replacement of the ascending aorta - remodeling vs. reimplantation.  J Thorac Cardisvasc Surg. 1998;  116 990-996
  • 10 Birks E J, Webb C, Child A, Radley-Smith R, Yacoub M H. Early and long-term results of a valve sparing operation for Marfan syndrome.  Circulation. 1999;  100 29-35
  • 11 Daily P O, Trueblood H W, Stinson E B, Wuerflein R D, Shumway N E. Management of acute aortic dissections.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1970;  10 237
  • 12 Guilmet D, Bachet J, Goudot B, Laurian C, Gigou F, Bical O, Barbagelatta M. Use of biological glue in acute aortic dissection.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;  77 516-521
  • 13 Westaby S, Katsumata T, Freitas E. Aortic valve conservation in acute type A dissection.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 108-1112
  • 14 Mazzucotelli J P, Deleuze P H, Baufreton C, Duval A M, Million M L, Loisance D Y, Cachera J P. Preservation of the aortic valve in acute aortic dissection: long-term echocardiographic assessment and clinical outcome.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;  55 ((6)) 1513-1517
  • 15 Miller D C, Stinson E B, Oyer P E, Rossiter S J, Reitz B A, Griepp R B, Shumway N E. Operative treatment of aortic dissection: Experience with 125 patients over a sixteen-year period.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;  78 365-383
  • 16 Otto C. Aortic valve insufficiency: changing concepts in diagnosis and management.  Cardiologia. 1996;  41 505-513
  • 17 Larson E W, Edwards W D. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases.  Am J Cardiol. 1984;  53 849-855
  • 18 Edwards W D, Leaf D S, Edwards J E. Dissecting aortic aneurysm associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve.  Circulation. 1978;  57 1022-10225
  • 19 Hahn R T, Roman M J, Mogtader A H, Devereux R B. Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;  19 283-288
  • 20 Fenoglio J, McAllister H, DeCastro C D. et al . Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve after the Age of 20.  Am J Cardiol. 1977;  39 164-169
  • 21 Wilkenshoff U M, Kruck I, Cast D, Schröder R. Validity of continuous wave Doppler and colour Doppler in the assessment of aortic regurgitation.  Eur Heart J. 1994;  15 1227-1234
  • 22 Nishimura R A, Vonk G D, Rumberger J A, Tagik A J. Semiquantification of aortic regurgitation by different Doppler echocardiographic techniques and comparison with ultrafast computed tomography.  Am Heart J. 1992;  124 995-1001

Dr. med. Thomas Graeter

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
University Hospitals

66421 Homburg (Saar)

Germany

Phone: +49 (6841) 162-501

Fax: +49 (6841) 162-788

Email: chhtgra@med-rz.uni-sb.de

    >