Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2001; 17(4): 225-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-14512
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Rare Variant of the Intrasoleus Musculocutaneous Perforator: Clinical Considerations in Raising a Free Peroneal Osteocutaneous Flap

Satoshi Yokoo1 , Takahide Komori1 , Shungo Furudoi1 , Masahiro Umeda1 , Tadashi Nomura2 , Shinya Tahara2
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan and
  • 2Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

To improve the stability of the cutaneous portion of the vascularized free peroneal osteocutaneous flap (the so-called peroneal flap), various anatomic studies have been conducted, and a reliable notion of the course of cutaneous perforators has been provided; however, anatomic anomalies have occasionally been observed. The authors encountered a rare type of cutaneous perforator in the distal third of the lower leg. It was located under the inferior surface of the flexor hallucis longus muscle, after running in the soleus muscle parallel to the fibula, and then joined the posterior tibial artery. Since absolutely definite diagnostic methods have not been established for the course of the cutaneous perforator, surgery with the possibility of secondary anastomosis, always with a separate peroneal flap, should be a consideration.

KEYWORD

Free peroneal osteocutaneous flap - variant of intrasoleus musculocutaneous perforator

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hidalgo D A. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandibular reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1989;  84 71
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Yoshimura M, Shimamura K, Iwai Y. Free vascularized fibula transport.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1983;  65A 1295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chen Z W, Yan W. The study and clinical application of the osteocutaneous flap of fibula.  Microsurgery . 1983;  4 11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Carriquiry C, Costa M A, Vasconez L O. An anatomic study of the septocutaneous vessels of the leg.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1985;  76 354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Beppu M, Hanel D P, Johnston G HF. The osteocutaneous fibula flap: an anatomic study.  J Reconstr Mictosurg . 1992;  8 215
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schusterman M A, Reece G P, Miller M J, Harris S. The osteocutaneous free fibula flap: is the skin paddle reliable?.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1992;  90 787
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wei F C, Seah C S, Tsai Y C. Fibula osteocutaneous flap for reconstruction of composite mandibular defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  93 294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jones N F, Monstrey S, Gambier B A. Reliability of the fibula osteocutaneous flap for mandibular reconstruction: anatomical and surgical confirmation.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1996;  97 707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Flemming A FS, Brough M D, Evans N D. Mandibular reconstruction using vascularized fibula.  Br J Plast Surg . 1990;  43 403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Winters H AH, De Jongh J G. Reliability of the proximal skin paddle of the osteocutaneous free fibula flap: a prospective clinical study.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  103 846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Weber R A, Pederson W C. Skin paddle salvage in the fibula osteocutaneous free flap with secondary skin paddle vascular anastomosis.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1995;  11 242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
      >