Rat-Strain Differences in Recovery Following Peripheral-Nerve Allotransplantation

ABSTRACT

The rat model is commonly utilized in peripheral nerve research. Due to the short length of the rat limb and the animal's inherent neuroregenerative capacity, the timing of assessment of nerve regeneration is critical, and significant differences between groups can be lost if assessment is done too late. Additionally, the comparison of data from different rat-strain combinations has been questioned. This study better defines the time course of recovery after peripheral nerve grafting, and examines differences between Buffalo (BUF), Lewis (LEW), and ACI rats. Tibial-nerve isografts and allografts were performed and harvested at 6, 8, 10, or 14 weeks. Histomorphometry documented a statistically significant difference in the ACI/LEW and LEW/LEW combination at 10 weeks. No strain differences in graft rejection were noted. The optimal time to assess for histomorphometric differences in the ACI/LEW and LEW/LEW combination is at 10 weeks postoperatively.

KEYWORD

Nerve - allotransplantation - strain

REFERENCES

• 1 Mackinnon S E, Hudson A R, Hunter D A. Histologic assessment of nerve regeneration in the rat.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1985;  75 384-388
• 2 Evans P J, Midha R, Mackinnon S E. The peripheral nerve allograft: a comprehensive review of regeneration and neuroimmunology.  Prog Neurobiol . 1994;  43 187-233
• 3 Lassner F, Schaller E, Steinhoff G. Cellular mechanisms of rejection and regeneration in peripheral nerve allografts.  Transplantation . 1989;  48 386-392
• 4 Schaller E, Berger A. Peripheral nerve allograft.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1987;  80 870-871
• 5 Hertl M C, Strasberg S, Mackinnon S E. The dose-related effect of monclonal antibodies against adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and LFA-1 on peripheral nerve allograft rejection in a rat model.  Restor Neurol Neurosci . 1996;  10 147-159
• 6 Genden E M, Mackinnon S E, Yu S, Flye M W. Induction of donor-specific tolerance to rat nerve allografts with portal venous donor alloantigen and anti-ICAM-1/LFA-1 monoclonal antibodies.  Surgery . 1998;  124 448-456
• 7 Nakao Y, Mackinnon S E, Strasberg S R. Immunosuppressive effect of monoclonal antibodies to ICAM-1 and LFA-1 on peripheral nerve allograft in mice.  Microsurgery . 1995;  16 612-620
• 8 Bain J R, Mackinnon S E, Hudson A R. The peripheral nerve allograft: a dose-response curve in the rat immunosuppressed with cyclosporin A.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1988;  82 447-457
• 9 Panczak A, Bila V, Sladka M. Genetic analysis of graft-versus-host disease using rat recombinant inbred strains.  Transplant Proc . 1997;  29 1734-1735
• 10 Fandrich F, Zhu X, Dresske B. Impact of RT1. C-encoded MHC antigens on host-versus-graft and graft- versus-host reactions in a model of small bowel transplantation in the rat.  Transplant Proc . 1997;  29 1730-1731
• 11 Lorentzen J C, Klareskog L. Comparative susceptibility of DA, LEW, and LEW.1AV1 rats to arthritis induced with different arthritogens: mineral oil, mycobacteria, muramyl dipeptide, avridine and rat collagen type II.  Transplant Proc . 1997;  29 1692-1693
• 12 Carr M M, Best T J, Mackinnon S E, Evans P J. Strain differences in autotomy in rats undergoing sciatic nerve transection or repair.  Ann Plast Surg . 1992;  28 538-544
• 13 Panerai A E, Sacerdote P, Brini A. Autotomy and central nervous system neuropeptides after section of the sciatic nerve in rats of different strains.  Pharmacol Biochem Behav . 1987;  28 385-388
• 14 Gong D, Fang Z, Ionescu P. Rat strain minimally influences anesthetic and convulsant requirements of inhaled compounds in rats.  Anesth Analg . 1998;  87 963-966
• 15 Strasberg J E, Strasberg S, Mackinnon S E. Strain differences in peripheral-nerve regeneration in rats.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1999;  15 287-293
• 16 Wonigeit K, Washington D, Hundrieser J. Lessons from rat models on the genetic basis of interindividual differences in lymphocyte phenotype.  Transplant Proc . 1998;  30 2341-2343
• 17 Zalewski A A, Silvers W K. An evaluation of nerve repair with nerve allografts in normal and immunologically tolerant rats.  J Neurosurg . 1980;  52 557-563
• 18 Mackinnon S, Hudson A, Falk R. Nerve allograft response: a quantitative immunological study.  Neurosurgery . 1982;  10 61-69
• 19 Mackinnon S E, Hudson A R, Falk R E, Hunter D A. The nerve allograft response-an experimental model in the rat.  Ann Plast Surg . 1985;  14 334-339
• 20 Schaller E, Lassner F, Becker M. Regeneration of autologous and allogenic nerve grafts in a rat genetic model: preliminary report.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1991;  7 9-12