The Safety, Efficacy, and Cost Efficiency of Outpatient Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis with Low Molecular Weight Heparin

ABSTRACT

-Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) remain significant heath care problems. Although standard unfractionated heparin effectively treats DVT and PE, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have many theoretical advantages, including less bleeding potential, less thrombocytopenia, improved bioavailability, and more even pharmacokinetics. Additionally, LMWHs are given subcutaneously based on patient weight and do not need to be monitored by blood tests. Multiple studies have compared LMWH to standard heparin for treatment of DVT/PE. LMWHs have a lower risk for major bleeding, recurrent thromboembolic disease, and mortality rate for the treatment of DVT, whereas for PE treatment they are at least equivalent to standard heparin and more convenient. However, not all patients are candidates for such outpatient therapy. The ability to give LMWH subcutaneously and the lack of need for intensive blood monitoring allows for outpatient therapy.

KEYWORD

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) - pulmonary embolism (PE) - low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)