Prospective Evaluation of Brush Cytology of Biliary Strictures During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Background and Study Aims: Cytological methods may be used to differentiate benign from malignant biliary strictures. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an endobiliary cytotechnique which can easily be performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Patients and Methods: Cytological samples were obtained by brushing biliary strictures via a guide wire in 86 patients with strictures of unknown status. Samples were classified by an expert cytologist as normal (including reactive cells), severely dysplastic (atypical cells suspicious of malignancy) and clearly malignant. A final diagnosis was achieved in 78 patients based on intraoperative findings and histological investigation, autopsy or prolonged follow-up. Strictures were malignant in 57 cases (31 pancreatic carcinoma, 20 cholangiocarcinoma, 6 others) and benign in 21 cases (11 chronic pancreatitis, 5 chronic nonspecific inflammation, 5 others).

Results: The overall results for brush cytological investigation were sensitivity 56.1 %, specificity 90.5 %, positive predictive value 94.1 %, negative predictive value 43.2 %, and accuracy 65.4 %. Sensitivity was significantly higher (P < 0.005) in cholangiocarcinoma (80 %) compared with pancreatic carcinoma (35.5 %). The overall specificity of less than 100 % resulted from dysplasia in two patients with chronic pancreatitis and inflammatory mass. No procedure-related complications occurred.

Conclusions: Brush cytology is helpful for differentiating between benign and malignant biliary strictures, especially in suspected cholangiocarcinoma. Dysplastic cells may occur in the absence of malignancy and their presence should therefore be interpreted cautiously.

References

• 1 Choudari CP, Fogel E, Gottlieb K, et al. Therapeutic biliary endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 163-173
• 2 Foutch PG, Kerr DM, Harlan JR, et al. A prospective controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 577-580
• 3 Desa LA, Akosa AB, Lazzara S, et al. Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture.  Gut. 1991;  32 1188-1191
• 4 Chang L, French S, Hierro M, et al. A prospective study comparing endobiliary biopsy, brush and aspiration cytology during ERCP in diagnosing biliary obstructive lesions.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;  87 1282
• 5 Kurzawinski T, Deery A, Dooley J, et al. A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures.  Gut. 1992;  33 1675-1677
• 6 Venu RP, Geenen JE, Kini M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology: a new technique.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  99 1475-1479
• 7 Rupp M, Hawthorne CM, Ehya H. Brushing cytology in biliary duct obstruction.  Acta Cytol. 1990;  34 221-226
• 8 Scudera PL, Koizumi J, Jacobson IM. Brush cytology evaluation of lesions encountered during ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 281-284
• 9 Foutch PG, Kerr D, Harlan JR, et al. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;  85 791-795
• 10 Rabinovitz M, Zajko AB, Hassanein T, et al. Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures.  Hepatology. 1990;  12 747-752
• 11 Ryan ME. Cytologic brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 139-142
• 12 Howell DA, Beveridge RP, Bosco J, et al. Endoscopic needle aspiration at ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 531-535
• 13 Kurzawinski TR, Deery A, Dooley JS, et al. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.  Hepatology. 1993;  18 1399-1403
• 14 Ferrari AP, Lichtenstein DR, Slivka A, et al. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 140-145
• 15 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N, et al. Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 465-467
• 16 Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V, et al. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures.  Gut. 1997;  40 671-677
• 17 Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F, et al. Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;  32 363-368
• 18 Rossi M, Lemos A, Bonaiuti P, et al. Instrumental diagnosis of obstructive jaundice: brushing versus biopsy.  Radiol Med Torino. 1997;  93 230-235
• 19 Foutch PG, Harlan JR, Kerr D, et al. Wire-guided brush cytology: a new endoscopic method for diagnosis of bile duct cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 243-247
• 20 Sawada Y, Gonda H, Hayashida Y. Combined use of brushing cytology and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the early detection of pancreatic cancer.  Acta Cytol. 1989;  33 870-374
• 21 McGuire DE, Venu RP, Brown RD, et al. Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 300-304
• 22 Ryan ME, Baldauf MC. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 133-139
• 23 Sears RJ, Duckworth CW, Decaestecker C, et al. Image cytometry as a discriminatory tool for cytologic specimens obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Cancer. 1998;  84 119-126
• 24 Van Laethem JL, Bourgeois V, Parma J, et al. Relative contribution of Ki-ras gene analysis and brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 479-485
• 25 Morales CP, Burdick JS, Saboorian MH, et al. In situ hybridization for telomerase RNA in routine cytologic brushings for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancies.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 402-405
• 26 Warshaw AL. Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging of early pancreatic cancer.  Am J Surg. 1991;  161 26-29
• 27 Paliard P, Ponchon T, Labadie M, et al. Value of intraductal biopsies and intraductal cytology in the etiological diagnosis of biliary stenoses.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1987;  11 449-452
• 28 Duber C, Klose KJ, Braunstein S, et al. Obstructive jaundice: its histological diagnosis by percutaneous endoluminal bile duct biopsy.  Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1991;  155 246-250
• 29 Tamada K, Ueno N, Tomiyama T, et al. Characterization of biliary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparison with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 341-349
• 30 Sato M, Inoue H, Ogawa S, et al. Limitations of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of the intramural extension of bile duct carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 281-288
• 31 Ortner M, Graebe D, Weber J, et al. The value of peroral cholangioscopy.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  114 A535
• 32 Layfield LJ, Wax TD, Lee JG, et al. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.  Acta Cytol. 1995;  39 11-18
• 33 Lee JG, Leung JW, Baillie J, et al. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant - making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 722-726