Outcomes of a Standardized Protocol on the Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background

Acute Type A aortic dissection (AAAD) is a life-threatening condition, with surgery being the recommended treatment. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal surgical procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing a standardized protocol, introduced in our institution in 2016, on AAAD management.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients treated surgically for AAAD between 2010 and 2021 in our department. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent surgery before 2016 using operator-dependent techniques, and those who underwent surgery starting in 2016 using a standardized protocol.

Results

A total of 104 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 66.5 ± 11.4 years and 55.8% were male. Demographics and preoperative data were similar in both groups. Arterial and venous cannulation site of both groups were different (p < 0.001): femoral artery and vein cannulation for group 1 versus subclavian artery and central venous canulation for group 2. Alone ascending aorta replacement versus ascending aorta plus hemiarch replacement were the preferred techniques in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). Hypothermic circulatory arrest and cerebral perfusion were largely performed in group 2 compared with group 1 (p < 0.001). The total time of surgery, the cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamping times were longer in group 2 (p < 0.05). Both groups had similar rates of postoperative complications, except for late reoperation and aortic dilatation rates, which were less frequent in group 2 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The implementation of a standardized institutional protocol can transform AAAD surgery from a “surgeon-tailored” to a “ patient-tailored” approach. The use of a standardized protocol in our institution resulted in a significant reduction of aortic reoperation and aortic dilation rates, suggesting that the introduction of standardized protocols in low-volume centers may improve AAAD management.

Keywords

acute Type A aortic dissection - aortic surgery - acute aortic syndrome

Publication History

Received: 31 December 2023

Accepted: 06 November 2024

Article published online:
13 May 2025

• References

• 1 Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C. et al; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines, The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. Eur Heart J 2014; 35 (41) 2873-2926
• 2 Gawinecka J, Schönrath F, von Eckardstein A. Acute aortic dissection: pathogenesis, risk factors and diagnosis. Swiss Med Wkly 2017; 147 (3334): w14489
• 3 Elefteriades JA, Ziganshin BA. Composite graft aortic root replacement: Bentall procedure. In: Elefteriades JA, Ziganshin BA. éds. Practical Tips in Aortic Surgery: Clinical and Technical Insights [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021: 145-58
• 4 Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM. et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 2000; 283 (07) 897-903
• 5 Rylski B, Georgieva N, Beyersdorf F. et al; German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A Working Group of the German Society of Thoracic, Cardiac, and Vascular Surgery. Gender-related differences in patients with acute aortic dissection type A. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162 (02) 528-535.e1
• 6 Zaschke L, Habazettl H, Thurau J. et al. Acute type A aortic dissection: Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in emergency care - surgical delay because of initial misdiagnosis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2020; 9 (3_suppl, suppl): S40-S47
• 7 Harris KM, Strauss CE, Eagle KA. et al; International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators. Correlates of delayed recognition and treatment of acute type A aortic dissection: the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 2011; 124 (18) 1911-1918
• 8 Clinical features and diagnosis of acute aortic dissection - UpToDate [Internet]. Accessed May 19, 2022 at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-features-and-diagnosis-of-acute-aortic-dissection#H2472481978
• 9 Toeg H, Rubens FD. Chapter 2 - Cannulation techniques for cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Sellke FW, Ruel M. éds. Atlas of Cardiac Surgical Techniques (2nd ed.) [Internet]. Elsevier; 2019: 14-30 . Accessed April 25, 2022 at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323462945000029
• 10 Gudbjartsson T, Ahlsson A, Geirsson A. et al. Acute type A aortic dissection - a review. Scand Cardiovasc J 2020; 54 (01) 1-13
• 11 Frankel WC, Green SY, Orozco-Sevilla V, Preventza O, Coselli JS. contemporary surgical strategies for acute Type A aortic dissection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 32 (04) 617-629
• 12 Elsayed RS, Cohen RG, Fleischman F, Bowdish ME. Acute Type A aortic dissection. Cardiol Clin 2017; 35 (03) 331-345
• 13 Ren Z, Wang Z, Hu R. et al. Which cannulation (axillary cannulation or femoral cannulation) is better for acute type A aortic dissection repair? A meta-analysis of nine clinical studies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47 (03) 408-415
• 14 Bachet J. What is the best method for brain protection in surgery of the aortic arch? Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. Cardiol Clin 2010; 28 (02) 389-401
• 15 Lee TY, Safi HJ, Estrera AL. Cerebral perfusion in aortic arch surgery: antegrade, retrograde, or both?. Tex Heart Inst J 2011; 38 (06) 674-677
• 16 Tang GHL, Spielvogel D, Lansman SL. Hypothermia alone might not be enough for cerebral protection in aortic arch surgery. Tex Heart Inst J 2013; 40 (05) 566-567
• 17 Tarkas TN, Stoicescu C, Munir W, Bashir M, Adams B. Short- and long-term outcomes of aortic root-sparing repair and replacement in acute type A aortic dissection repair. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2021; 29 (07) 627-634
• 18 Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E. et al; IRAD Investigators. Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation 2018; 137 (17) 1846-1860
• 19 Yang B, Norton EL, Hobbs R. et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of aortic root repair and replacement in patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair: twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157 (06) 2125-2136
• 20 Malaisrie SC, Szeto WY, Halas M. et al; AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee: Adult Cardiac Surgery. 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert consensus document: Surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162 (03) 735-758.e2
• 21 Hsieh WC, Kan CD, Yu HC. et al. Ascending aorta replacement vs. total aortic arch replacement in the treatment of acute type A dissection: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2019; 23 (21) 9590-9611
• 22 Poon SS, Theologou T, Harrington D, Kuduvalli M, Oo A, Field M. Hemiarch versus total aortic arch replacement in acute type A dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 5 (03) 156-173
• 23 Malvindi PG, Modi A, Miskolczi S. et al. Open and closed distal anastomosis for acute type A aortic dissection repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22 (06) 776-783
• 24 Geirsson A, Shioda K, Olsson C. et al. Differential outcomes of open and clamp-on distal anastomosis techniques in acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157 (05) 1750-1758
• 25 Bonser RS, Ranasinghe AM, Loubani M. et al. Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58 (24) 2455-2474