Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809034
Original Article

Outcome of Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap for Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects in Indian Population and Their Correlation with Flap Dimensions

Sachin Verma
1   Department of General Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Sonia Moses
1   Department of General Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Saurabh Gupta 
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Ankit Baghel
1   Department of General Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Fareed Khan
1   Department of General Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Avinash Gautam
1   Department of General Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Ramendra Singh Gurjar
1   Department of General Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction

This is a study to assess versatility of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for reconstruction of head and neck defects. This study has also evaluated complications of SCAIF and their correlation with flap dimensions.

Materials and Methods

This is a prospective study done at a single institute for 1-year duration. A total of 30 patients with head and neck cancer were included in the study. SCAIF was used in all patients for reconstruction of defect after carcinoma resection. Postoperative follow-up was done for 3 weeks. The study variables were location of defect, length and width of flap, time taken for flap harvest, and complications.

Results

Flap-related early complications were observed in 6 (20%) patients. These early complications were distal margin necrosis in four patients, partial flap loss in one patient, and wound infection and development of orocutaneous fistula in one patient. Stiffness in neck and shoulder movements (late complication) was noted in two patients. Among patients who developed complications, the mean flap length was 16.38 cm when compared with 15.68 cm among those who did not develop complications. Difference in mean flap length was found to be statistically significant (p-value = 0.019).

Conclusion

SCAIF provides a skin paddle which is hairless, thin, pliable, and color-matched with the recipient site in the head and neck region. However, its limited reach and smaller volume should be kept in mind while planning reconstruction. The safe length of SCAIF is 16 to 17 cm (up to lower third of deltoid muscle), which makes it a suitable choice for defect of lower third of the head and neck region.

Keywords

supraclavicular artery island flap - head and neck defects - flap dimensions - complications

Authors' Contributions

S.V. and S.M. contributed to the concept and design of the study and were involved in the clinical work. A.B. was responsible for data collection, data analysis, clinical work, literature search, and contributed to manuscript writing and editing. S.G. participated in the concept and design of the study, clinical work, data analysis, literature search, and was involved in both writing and editing the manuscript. F.K., A.G., and R.S.G. were involved in the clinical work and manuscript review.


Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by Institutional Review Board of our institute; written informed consent was taken from all the patients; confidentiality was maintained throughout the study.




Publication History

Article published online:
08 May 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Lamberty BG, Cormack GC. Misconceptions regarding the cervico-humeral flap. Br J Plast Surg 1983; 36 (01) 60-63
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 1878-1884 , discussion 1885–1886
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Pallua N, Magnus Noah E. The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (03) 842-851 , discussion 852–854
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Vinh VQ, Van Anh T, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H. Anatomical and clinical studies of the supraclavicular flap: analysis of 103 flaps used to reconstruct neck scar contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (05) 1471-1480
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (01) 115-123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK. The supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: applications and limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (11) 1247-1255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Atallah S, Guth A, Chabolle F, Bach CA. Supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2015; 132 (05) 291-294
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wong S, Brennan M, Nishikawa S, Lim JH. Supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: a case series and literature review. Perm J 2019; 23: 23
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Nasr HY, Friedlander P, Chiu ES. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: 15-year experience, past, present, future. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (06) e5052
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Nthumba PM. The supraclavicular artery flap: a versatile flap for neck and orofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (08) 1997-2004
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Giordano L, Di Santo D, Bondi S. et al. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction: an Italian multi-institutional experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2018; 38 (06) 497-503
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Chan JWH, Wong C, Ward K, Saint-Cyr M, Chiu ES. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography studies of the supraclavicular artery island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (02) 525-531
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Telang P, Jagannathan M, Devale M. A study of the use of the supraclavicular artery flap for resurfacing of head, neck, and upper torso defects. Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42 (01) 4-12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 More A, Sivakumar A, Gaurav GK. Supraclavicular flap for large anterior chest wall defects-a road less travelled. Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53 (03) 427-430
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Thaduri A. et al. Supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: our experience. J Head Neck Phys Surg 2023; 11: 102-106
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Padiyar BV, Azeem Mohiyuddin SM, Sagayaraj A, Merchant S. Usefulness of supraclavicular flap in reconstruction following resection of oral cancer. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 4 (02) 148-152
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Shenoy A, Patil VS, Prithvi BS, Chavan P, Halkud R. Supraclavicular artery flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: an emerging alternative. Int J Surg Oncol 2013; 2013: 658989
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mahipathy SR. et al. Supraclavicular artery flaps for head and neck reconstruction: a prospective study. Int Surg J 2020; 7 (09) 3060-3064
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) vs free fasciocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (06) 941-948
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Welz C, Canis M, Schwenk-Zieger S, Spiegel JL, Weiss BG, Pilavakis Y. Oral cancer reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap: comparison to free radial forearm flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75 (10) 2261-2269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Yu P. The transverse cervical vessels as recipient vessels for previously treated head and neck cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (05) 1253-1258
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Razdan SN, Albornoz CR, Ro T. et al. Safety of the supraclavicular artery island flap in the setting of neck dissection and radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (05) 378-383
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kokot N, Kim JH, West JD, Zhang P. Supraclavicular artery island flap: critical appraisal and comparison to alternate reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (Suppl. 03) 1-14
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar