CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778645
Original Article

Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Open Carpal Tunnel Release and Thread Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mohammad-Reza Akhoondinasab
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Hossein Akbari
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Siamak-Farokh Forghani
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Babak Naderi
3   School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and Objectives Surgical techniques for carpal tunnel release (CTR) have gradually become less invasive. No substantial evidence supports replacing the open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) with novel minimally invasive approaches. Thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) is a new minimally invasive CTR method associated with promising results. This study aimed to compare the aesthetic and functional outcomes of OCTR with TCTR.

Materials and Methods This study was a randomized clinical trial conducted in a hospital in Tehran, Iran, in 2022. Patients were randomized to OCTR and TCTR groups through simple randomization. Data such as demographics, nerve conduction study, electromyography, pain, and sensory evaluation by monofilament test were recorded in patients at baseline and after 3 months. Aesthetic evaluation was conducted by assessing the scar length and patients' satisfaction 3 months after the surgery.

Results Twenty patients (10 in each group) entered the final analysis. Nerve conduction study, electromyography, and sensory evaluation were similar between groups 3 months after the operation. The TCTR group had lower postsurgical pain (p < 0.001) and lower scar length (p < 0.001) compared to the OCTR group. Overall satisfaction was not statistically different between TCTR and OCTR.

Conclusion The TCTR method is safe in patients with CTS, and its efficacy is similar to OCTR. It can be a good alternative for OCTR, with a better aesthetic outcome.

Ethical Approval

All the procedures were performed in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Appropriate institutional review board approval has been obtained.




Publication History

Article published online:
15 January 2024

© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (12) 1273-1284
  • 2 Mathew AE, John T. A clinical and neurophysiological analysis of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome with respect to gender and occupation. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2021; 24 (06) 865-872
  • 3 Feng B, Chen K, Zhu X. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of self-reported wrist and hand symptoms and clinically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome among office workers in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2021; 21 (01) 57
  • 4 Fathy M, ElSadek A, Hamid E, AbdElMoneim A. Assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome via ultrasonography among hospital workers: a screening study. Egypt J Neurol Psychiat Neurosurg 2021; 57 (01) 129
  • 5 Carlson H, Colbert A, Frydl J, Arnall E, Elliot M, Carlson N. Current options for nonsurgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Clin Rheumatol 2010; 5 (01) 129-142
  • 6 Scholten RJPM, Mink van der Molen A, Uitdehaag BMJ, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 2007 (04) CD003905-CD003905
  • 7 de la Fuente J, Aramendi JF, Ibañez JM. et al. Minimally invasive ultrasound-guided vs open release for carpal tunnel syndrome in working population: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Ultrasound 2021; 49 (07) 693-703
  • 8 Wongsiri S, Liawrungrueang W. Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release (CTR) using the Wongsiri technique with MiniSURE. Adv Orthop 2020; 2020: 6273723-6273723
  • 9 Guo D, Tang Y, Ji Y, Sun T, Guo J, Guo D. A non-scalpel technique for minimally invasive surgery: percutaneously looped thread transection of the transverse carpal ligament. Hand (N Y) 2015; 10 (01) 40-48
  • 10 George J, Kumar KK, Vijayakumar G, Ravishankar M. Functional outcome of surgically managed perilunate injuries. Indian J Orthop 2020; 54 (Suppl. 02) 270-276
  • 11 Mujadzic T, Friedman HI, Mujadzic MM. et al. Modified carpal tunnel release: a new approach to minimizing pillar pain. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (6S, Suppl 5): S503-S509
  • 12 Morán-Morán J, Mérida-Velasco JR, Del Valle EB, Murillo-González J. A mini-incision carpal tunnel release technique to prevent pillar pain: a technical note. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2021; 55 (01) 73-75
  • 13 Haghighat S, Zarezadeh A, Khosrawi S, Oreizi A. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in pillar pain after carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Adv Biomed Res 2019; 8 (01) 31-31
  • 14 Ludlow KS, Merla JL, Cox JA, Hurst LN. Pillar pain as a postoperative complication of carpal tunnel release: a review of the literature. J Hand Ther 1997; 10 (04) 277-282
  • 15 Seitz WHJ, Lall A. Open carpal tunnel release with median neurolysis and Z-plasty reconstruction of the transverse carpal ligament. Curr Orthop Pract 2013; 24 (01) 53-57
  • 16 Khoshnevis J, Layegh H, Yavari N. et al. Comparing open conventional carpal tunnel release with mini-incision technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a non-randomized clinical trial. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 55: 119-123
  • 17 Guo D, Guo D, Guo J, Schmidt SC, Lytie RM. A clinical study of the modified thread carpal tunnel release. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (05) 453-460
  • 18 Benson LS, Bare AA, Nagle DJ, Harder VS, Williams CS, Visotsky JL. Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (09) 919-924 , 924.e1–924.e2
  • 19 Kretschmer T, Antoniadis G, Richter HP, König RW. Avoiding iatrogenic nerve injury in endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2009; 20 (01) 65-71 , vi–vii
  • 20 Guo D, Guo D, Guo J, Malone DG, Wei N, McCool LC. A cadaveric study for the improvement of thread carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (10) e351-e357
  • 21 Davies J, Fallon V, Kyaw Tun J. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous compartment release: a novel technique, proof of concept, and clinical relevance. Skeletal Radiol 2019; 48 (06) 959-963
  • 22 Smith JL, Ebraheim NA. Anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve: a review. J Orthop 2019; 16 (06) 576-579
  • 23 Asserson DB, North TJ, Rhee PC, Bishop AT, Brault JS, Shin AY. Return to work following ultrasound guided thread carpal tunnel release versus open carpal tunnel release: a comparative study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2022; 47 (04) 359-363
  • 24 Burnham RS, Loh EY, Rambaransingh B, Roberts SL, Agur AM, Playfair LD. A controlled trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided looped thread carpal tunnel release. Hand (N Y) 2021; 16 (01) 73-80
  • 25 Schrier VJMM, Shin AY, Brault JS. An incision-less ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release technique. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2020; 25 (01) 14-19