Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776326
Use of the Direct Standard for Patient Event Notifications: A Qualitative Study Among Industry Leaders
Abstract
Background Health care organizations seek to maximize efficiency and effectiveness when sending patient event notifications required by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule.
Objectives To identify the barriers for senders (i.e., hospitals) and receivers (Department of Veterans Affairs [VA] and non-VA) of patient event notifications using the Direct Standard, the transport method standard that addresses Direct Messaging (DM).
Methods Questions were asked to better understand perceived barriers to sending and receiving event notifications as well as involvement with event notifications with VA. Open coding was used to identify themes in the transcribed interviews.
Results Analysis of the interviews (n = 17) showed workflow barriers, including identifying a patient's provider, the provider's Direct address, and whether a patient is an enrolled Veteran, were the most common barriers. Next were technical barriers, such as payload and electronic health record ingestion of event notifications. Less common barriers included content, policy/governance, cost, and organizational issues. The interviews also highlighted a promising pilot between VA and an aggregator.
Conclusion Overall, interviewees felt that event notifications are a benefit from a coordination of care perspective for patients and clinical care teams. Also, interviewees felt that DirectTrust's Implementation Guide for Event Notifications via the Direct Standard has helped guide (and perhaps the DirectTrust Directory could help guide) the industry in sending and more effectively receiving event notifications.
Keywords
health information exchange - workflow - veterans - U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services - direct messaging - qualitativeProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was reviewed by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board.
Publication History
Received: 28 March 2023
Accepted: 08 September 2023
Article published online:
15 November 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. Interoperability in Healthcare. February 18, 2022. Accessed February 18, 2022 at: https://www.himss.org/resources/interoperability-healthcare
- 2 Dixon BE. Introduction to Health Information Exchange. In: Dixon BE. ed. Health Information Exchange: Navigating and Managing a Network of Health Information Systems. 2nd ed.. Academic Press; 2023. : chap 1
- 3 Dixon BE, Feldman SS. Engaging and sustaining stakeholders: towards governance. In: Dixon BE. ed. Health Information Exchange: Navigating and Managing a Network of Health Information Systems. 2nd ed.. Academic Press; 2023. :chap 4
- 4 French DD, Dixon BE, Perkins SM. et al. Short-term medical costs of a VHA health information exchange: a CHEERS-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (02) e2481-e2481
- 5 Rahurkar S, Vest JR, Menachemi N. Despite the spread of health information exchange, there is little evidence of its impact on cost, use, and quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015; 34 (03) 477-483
- 6 Hincapie A, Warholak T. The impact of health information exchange on health outcomes. Appl Clin Inform 2011; 2 (04) 499-507
- 7 Yeager VA, Vest JR, Walker D, Diana ML, Menachemi N. Challenges to conducting health information exchange research and evaluation: reflections and recommendations for examining the value of HIE. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2017; 5 (01) 15
- 8 Feldman SS, Horan TA, Drew D. Understanding the value proposition of health information exchange: the case of uncompensated care cost recovery. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2013; 2 (02) 134-146
- 9 Menachemi N, Rahurkar S, Harle CA, Vest JR. The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (09) 1259-1265
- 10 United States Department of Health and Human Services. HITECH Act Enforcement Interim Final Rule. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. February 20, 2017, Updated June 16, 2017. Accessed February 20, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/hitech-act-enforcement-interim-final-rule/index.html
- 11 DirectTrust. ANSI/DS 2019–01–100–2021-Applicability Statement for Secure Health TransportVersion1.3 (Commonly known as “The Direct Standard™”). Updated August 3, 2015 at: https://directtrust.app.box.com/s/p1dpmt9tkoa9ay7h3bmcwwo5jj0yrhw7
- 12 DirectTrust. DirectTrust Consensus Body DS2021_01 Information Exchange for Human Services (IX4HS) Charter. 2019 (February 14, 2022) at: https://directtrust.app.box.com/s/ibry6zq0sl4cp6nm0v80ry0fu5hxij7x
- 13 Lane SR, Miller H, Ames E. et al; DirectTrust Clinicians' Steering Group. Consensus Statement: feature and function recommendations to optimize clinician usability of direct interoperability to enhance patient care. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (01) 205-220
- 14 DirectTrust. Direct Secure Messaging General Overview Blue: Direct Secure Messaging—At a Glance. Updated 2020 October 16. https://directtrust.org/resources
- 15 DirectTrust. Q4 2022 Metrics. May 1, 2023, 2023. Accessed May 1, 2023. https://directtrust.app.box.com/s/0iomf8gnt5qvvd8v5k3ap0zy1sxlk4pf
- 16 Dixon BE, Judon KM, Schwartzkopf AL. et al. Impact of event notification services on timely follow-up and rehospitalization among primary care patients at two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (12) 2593-2600
- 17 Unruh MA, Jung H-Y, Kaushal R, Vest JR. Hospitalization event notifications and reductions in readmissions of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the Bronx, New York. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (e1): e150-e156
- 18 Franzosa E, Traylor M, Judon KM. et al. Perceptions of event notification following discharge to improve geriatric care: qualitative interviews of care team members from a 2-site cluster randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (08) 1728-1735
- 19 Kartje R, Dixon BE, Schwartzkopf AL. et al. Characteristics of Veterans with non-va encounters enrolled in a trial of standards-based, interoperable event notification and care coordination. J Am Board Fam Med 2021; 34 (02) 301-308
- 20 Moore T, Shapiro JS, Doles L. et al. Event detection: a clinical notification service on a health information exchange platform. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2012; 2012: 635-642
- 21 Trudnak T, Mansour M, Mandel K. et al. A case study of pediatric asthma alerts from the Beacon Community Program in Cincinnati: technology is just the first step. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2014; 2 (01) 1047
- 22 Vest JR, Ancker JS. Health information exchange in the wild: the association between organizational capability and perceived utility of clinical event notifications in ambulatory and community care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (01) 39-46
- 23 DirectTrust. Event Notifications via the Direct Standard™ February 17, 2022, Updated October 27, 2021. Accessed February 17, 2022 at: https://directtrust.org/standards/event-notifications-via-direct
- 24 DirectTrust Wins Approval of Direct Standard™ as ANSI National Standard. GlobeNewswire; Jul 21, 2021, 2022. Accessed July 31, 2022 at: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/07/21/2266571/0/en/DirectTrust-Wins-Approval-of-Direct-Standard-as-ANSI-National-Standard.html
- 25 Kibbe DC. Implementation guide for event notifications via the Direct Standard™: An introduction and overview. PowerPoint presentation; 2021
- 26 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Interoperability and Patient Access for Medicare Advantage Organization and Medicaid Managed Care Plans, State Medicaid Agencies, CHIP Agencies and CHIP Managed Care Entities, Issuers of Qualified Health Plans on the Federally-Facilitated Exchanges, and Health Care Providers. Fed Regist 2020; 25510-25640 . Accessed December 15, 2021 at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/01/2020-05050/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-interoperability-and
- 27 Hein EM, Haines CA. CMS Interoperability Final Rule: Impact on Health Care Providers. Post Schell; 2020. . July 2, 2020. Accessed November 5, 2021 at: https://www.postschell.com/insights/cms-interoperability-final-rule-impact-on-health-care-providers
- 28 Rasmussen P, Farmer CM. The Promise and Challenges of VA Community Care: Veterans' Issues in Focus. RAND Corporation; 2022
- 29 Department of Veterans Affairs. Office of Data Governance and Analytics, Veteran Population Projection Model, (VetPop) 2018 VBA, Veterans Health Administration, Office of the Assistant Deputy UnderSecretary for Health for Policy and Planning. Department of Veterans Affairs Statistics at a Glance; . July 31, 2022. Updated December 31, 2021. Accessed July 31, 2022 at: https://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/Quickfacts/Stats_at_a_glance_12_31_21.PDF
- 30 Department of Veterans Affairs. Health Benefits. July 31, 2022. Updated April 23, 2019. Accessed July 31, 2022 at: https://www.va.gov/healthbenefits/resources/publications/hbco/hbco_enrollment_eligibility.asp
- 31 Department of Veterans Affairs. VA Direct Biweekly Report (October 10, 2021)
- 32 Department of Veterans Affairs. VA Direct Messaging: progress and challenges within the VA. In: Crandall G. editor: Department of Veterans Affairs; 2020
- 33 Rahurkar S, Vest JR, Finnell JT, Dixon BE. Trends in user-initiated health information exchange in the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (03) 622-627
- 34 Richter B, Dixon B. Drivers and barriers to the use of health information exchange amongst clinicians in the emergency department. Accessed October 8, 2021 at: https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/IMPRS/article/view/24739/23415
- 35 Botts N, Bouhaddou O, Bennett J. et al. Data quality and interoperability challenges for ehealth exchange participants: observations from the Department of Veterans Affairs' virtual lifetime electronic record health pilot phase. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2014; 2014: 307-314
- 36 Wing K, Bouhaddou O, Hsing N. et al. Motivation and barriers to using the Veterans Health Information Exchange: a survey of Veterans Affairs 'superusers'. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020; 2019: 913-922
- 37 Wiley KK, Hilts KE, Ancker JS, Unruh MA, Jung HY, Vest JR. Organizational characteristics and perceptions of clinical event notification services in healthcare settings: a study of health information exchange. JAMIA Open 2020; 3 (04) 611-618
- 38 Altman R, Shapiro JS, Moore T, Kuperman GJ. Notifications of hospital events to outpatient clinicians using health information exchange: a post-implementation survey. Inform Prim Care 2012; 20 (04) 249-255
- 39 Nelson H. Healthcare System Meets CMS Final Rule with API EHR Integration. EHR Intelligence; 2021. . June 9, 2021. December 10, 2021. Accessed December 10, 2021 at: https://ehrintelligence.com/news/healthcare-system-meets-cms-final-rule-with-api-ehr-integration