RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772583
Directly Integrating Health Information Exchange (HIE) Data with the Electronic Health Record Increases HIE Use by Emergency Department Clinicians
Funding This research was made possible by the Lilly Endowment Inc. Physician Scientist Initiative; Indiana University Health and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, funded in part by grant ULI TR002529 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Award; and the Advances in Medicine (AIM) grant from Cook Medical. Drs. Rivera, Schleyer, Schaffer, Vest, and Jang received funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality under grant R01HS027185. Dr. Rivera and Ms. Hosler were part of the Indiana Public and Population Health Informatics training program at Fairbanks School of Public Health and Regenstrief Institute, supported by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under award T15LM012502. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, Cook Medical, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Indiana University, or Regenstrief Institute.

Abstract
Objectives This article (1) develops a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources app, Health Dart, that integrates information from Indiana's community health information exchange (HIE), the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), directly with Cerner, an electronic health record (EHR), and (2) evaluates the effect of Health Dart's implementation on HIE use.
Methods Health Dart was implemented in 14 Indiana University Health emergency departments (EDs) using a stepped-wedge study design. We analyzed rates of INPC use in 286,175 ED encounters between October 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of INPC use given the implementation context, such as user interface (UI) enhancements and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Results INPC use increased by 131% across all encounters (from 3.6 to 8.3%; p < 0.001) after Health Dart implementation. INPC use increased by 144% (from 3.6 to 8.8%; p < 0.001) more than 2 months postimplementation. After UI enhancements, postimplementation INPC use increased by 123% (from 3.5 to 7.8%) compared to 181% (from 3.6 to 10.1%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before UI enhancements. During the pandemic, postimplementation INPC use increased by 135% (from 3.4 to 8.0%; p < 0.001) compared to 178% (from 3.6 to 10%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before the pandemic. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05).
Conclusion Direct integration of HIE information into an EHR substantially increased frequency of HIE use, but the effect was weakened by the UI enhancements and pandemic. HIE information integrated into EHRs in the form of problem-oriented dashboards can potentially make information retrieval more efficient and effective for clinicians.
Keywords
emergency departments - health information exchange - Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources - FHIR - electronic health record - COVID-19 pandemicAuthor Contributions
R.L.R.: conceptualization; formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review and editing; H.H.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, visualization, writing—original draft; J.H.J.: formal analysis, methodology, validation; J.T.S.: funding acquisition, resources, writing—review and editing; J.P.: data curation, resources; J.R.V.: methodology, funding acquisition, formal analysis oversight, writing—review and editing; T.K.S.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review and editing.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed and approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board protocol #1905749709.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 22. Juli 2022
Angenommen: 26. Januar 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. September 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Adler-Milstein J, Embi PJ, Middleton B, Sarkar IN, Smith J. Crossing the health IT chasm: considerations and policy recommendations to overcome current challenges and enable value-based care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (05) 1036-1043
- 2 Lichtner V, Baysari M. Electronic display of a patient treatment over time: a perspective on clinicians' burn-out. BMJ Health Care Inform 2021; 28 (01) e100281
- 3 Friedberg MW, Chen PG, Van Busum KR. et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. Rand Health Q 2014; 3 (04) 1
- 4 Payne TH, Corley S, Cullen TA. et al. Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (05) 1102-1110
- 5 Bourgeois FC, Olson KL, Mandl KD. Patients treated at multiple acute health care facilities: quantifying information fragmentation. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170 (22) 1989-1995
- 6 Windle JR, Katz AS, Dow Jr JP. et al. 2016 ACC/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI health policy statement on integrating the healthcare enterprise. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68 (12) 1348-1364
- 7 Menachemi N, Rahurkar S, Harle CA, Vest JR. The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (09) 1259-1265
- 8 Rudin RS, Motala A, Goldzweig CL, Shekelle PG. Usage and effect of health information exchange: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161 (11) 803-811
- 9 The Office for the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Connecting health and care for the nation: a shared nationwide interoperability roadmap. Final version 1.0. Washington, DC; 2018. Accessed July 22, 2022 at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/hie-interoperability/nationwide-interoperability-roadmap-final-version-1.0.pdf
- 10 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Final interoperability roadmap statements of support. HealthIT.gov. Accessed March 15, 2022 at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/interoperability_roadmap_statements_of_support_2015-11-16_1.pdf
- 11 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. MACRA: MIPS & APMs. CMS.gov. Accessed March 15, 2022 at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/value-based-programs/macra-mips-and-apms/macra-mips-and-apms
- 12 Holmgren AJ, Adler-Milstein J. Health information exchange in U.S. hospitals: the current landscape and a path to improved information sharing. J Hosp Med 2017; 12 (03) 193-198
- 13 Upton F. 21st Century Cures Act, H.R. 6. 114th Cong (2015–2016). Accessed March 15, 2022 at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/6/text
- 14 Pronovost P, Palmer S, Johns MME. et al. Procuring interoperability: achieving high-quality, connected, and person-centered care. National Academy of Medicine. Accessed March 15, 2022 at: https://nam.edu/procuring-interoperability-achieving-high-quality-connected-and-person-centered-care/
- 15 Ruley M, Walker V, Studeny J, Coustasse A. The nationwide health information network: the case of the expansion of health information exchanges in the United States. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2018; 37 (04) 333-338
- 16 Lin SC, Everson J, Adler-Milstein J. Technology, incentives, or both? Factors related to level of hospital health information exchange. Health Serv Res 2018; 53 (05) 3285-3308
- 17 Kibbe DC, Phillips Jr RL, Green LA. The continuity of care record. Am Fam Physician 2004; 70 (07) 1220-1223 , 1222–1223
- 18 Stack SJ, Botstein G, Mattison J. et al. Improving care: priorities to improve electronic health record usability. American Medical Association. Accessed March 15, 2022 at: https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/member/about-aherehr-priorities.pdf
- 19 Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C. et al. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA 2005; 293 (05) 565-571
- 20 Everson J. The implications and impact of 3 approaches to health information exchange: community, enterprise, and vendor-mediated health information exchange. Learn Health Syst 2017; 1 (02) e10021
- 21 American Hospital Association. Sharing health information for treatment. TrendWatch. Accessed March 15, 2022 at: https://www.aha.org/system/files/2018-03/sharing-health-information.pdf
- 22 Furukawa MF, King J, Patel V, Hsiao CJ, Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. Despite substantial progress In EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33 (09) 1672-1679
- 23 Holmgren AJ, Patel V, Adler-Milstein J. Progress in interoperability: measuring US hospitals' engagement in sharing patient data. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017; 36 (10) 1820-1827
- 24 Jensen LG, Bossen C. Factors affecting physicians' use of a dedicated overview interface in an electronic health record: The importance of standard information and standard documentation. Int J Med Inform 2016; 87: 44-53
- 25 Schleyer TKL, Rahurkar S, Baublet AM. et al; FHIR Development Team. Preliminary evaluation of the Chest Pain Dashboard, a FHIR-based approach for integrating health information exchange information directly into the clinical workflow. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc 2019; 2019: 656-664
- 26 Adler-Milstein J, Wang MD. The impact of transitioning from availability of outside records within electronic health records to integration of local and outside records within electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (04) 606-612
- 27 Buchanan J. Accelerating the benefits of the problem oriented medical record. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (01) 180-190
- 28 Yan Q, Jiang Z, Harbin Z, Tolbert PH, Davies MG. Exploring the relationship between electronic health records and provider burnout: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 1009-1021
- 29 Cantwell E, McDermott K. Making technology talk: how interoperability can improve care, drive effidcincy, and reduce waste. Healthc Financ Manage 2016; 70 (05) 70-76
- 30 Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME. Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (02) 217-224
- 31 Semanik MG, Kleinschmidt PC, Wright A. et al. Impact of a problem-oriented view on clinical data retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 899-906
- 32
Koopman RJ,
Kochendorfer KM,
Moore JL.
et al.
A diabetes dashboard and physician efficiency and accuracy in accessing data needed
for high-quality diabetes care. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9 (05) 398-405
MissingFormLabel
- 33 Kummer BR, Willey JZ, Zelenetz MJ. et al. Neurological dashboards and consultation turnaround time at an academic medical center. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 849-858
- 34 Khairat SS, Dukkipati A, Lauria HA, Bice T, Travers D, Carson SS. The impact of visualization dashboards on quality of care and clinician satisfaction: integrative literature review. JMIR Human Factors 2018; 5 (02) e22
- 35 Hartnett KP, Kite-Powell A, DeVies J. et al; National Syndromic Surveillance Program Community of Practice. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits—United States, January 1, 2019–May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69 (23) 699-704
- 36 Venkatesh AK, Janke AT, Shu-Xia L. et al. Emergency department utilization for emergency conditions during COVID-19. Ann Emerg Med 2021; 78 (01) 84-91
- 37 Barker D, McElduff P, D'Este C, Campbell MJ. Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016; 16 (01) 69
- 38 Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28 (02) 182-191
- 39 Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 2015; 350 (01) h391
- 40 Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G. et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q 2003; 27 (03) 425
- 41
Damschroder LJ,
Aron DC,
Keith RE,
Kirsh SR,
Alexander JA,
Lowery JC.
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated
framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4 (01) 50
MissingFormLabel
- 42 Lin SC, Jha AK, Adler-Milstein J. Electronic health records associated with lower hospital mortality after systems have time to mature. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37 (07) 1128-1135
- 43 Indiana Health Information Exchange. OneCare. Published 2020. Accessed September 28, 2021 at: https://www.ihie.org/onecare/#careweb
- 44 Rahurkar S, Vest JR, Finnell JT, Dixon BE. Trends in user-initiated health information exchange in the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (03) 622-627
- 45 Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed.. New York, NY: Free Press; 1983
- 46 Ratwani RM, Savage E, Will A. et al. A usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: a multi-center study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (09) 1197-1201
- 47 Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1994
- 48 Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 1954; 47 (06) 381-391