Download PDF
Sprache · Stimme · Gehör 2018; 42(02): 68-72
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-123984
Schwerpunktthema
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der bimodal-bilinguale Erwerbskontext von Codas – soziolinguistische Besonderheiten und Sprachwahlstrategien gehörloser Eltern

The Bimodal Bilingual Acquisition Context of Codas – Sociolinguistic Features and Language Choice Strategies of Deaf Parents
Kristin Hennies
Herbert Feuchte Stiftungsverbund gemeinnützige GmbH
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 June 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Hörende Kinder gehörloser Eltern (Codas – children of deaf adults) wachsen bimodal-bilingual in einem Mehrsprachigkeitskontext auf. Dieser geht für den Spracherwerb der Kinder mit besonderen Bedingungen einher. Die Minderheit-Mehrheitkonstellation von monomodal-bilingualen Familien und Familien mit gehörlosen Eltern zeigt dabei ähnliche Eigenschaften. Neben Gebärdensprache verwenden gehörlose Mütter auch Codeblending in der kindgerichteten Kommunikation. Diese Erwerbsbedingungen stellen eher für den Gebärdenspracherwerb eine Herausforderung dar.

Abstract

Codas (children of deaf adults) grow up in a multilingual acquisition context with specific conditions for these children. The majority-minority situation of monomodal bilingual families and families with deaf parents share similar characteristics. Deaf mothers use sign language and code-blending in the child-directed communication. These conditions offer additional challenges for the sign language acquisition.

Schlüsselwörter

bimodale Bilingualität - Codas - Sprachwahlstrategien

Keywords

bimodal bilingualism - codas - language choice
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Grüner B. Die Sprachentwicklung hörender (Vorschul-)Kinder hochgradig hörgeschädigter bzw. gehörloser Eltern. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hofmann K, Chilla S. Bimodal bilingual language development of hearing children of deaf parents. European Journal of Special Needs Education 2015; 1: 30-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Capirci O, Iverson JM, Montanari S. et al. Gestural, Signed and Spoken Modalities in early Language Development: The Role of Linguistic Input. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2002; 5: 25-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Griffith PL. Mode-Switching and Mode-Finding in a Hearing Child of Deaf Parents. Sign Language Studies 1985; 48: 195-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kanto L, Huttunen K, Laakso M-L. Relationship between the Linguistic Environments and Early Bilingual Language Development of Hearing Children in Deaf-parented Families. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2013; 1-19 doi:10.1093/deafd/ens071
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schiff NB, Ventry IM. Communication Problems in Hearing Children of Deaf Parents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1976; 41: 348-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Johnson JM, Watkins RV, Rice ML. Bimodal bilingual language development in a hearing child of deaf parents. Applied Psycholinguistics 1992; 13: 31-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Prinz PM, Prinz EA. Simultaneous Acquisition of ASL and Spoken English: Phase I. Early Lexical Development. Sign Language Studies 1979; 25: 283-296
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Petitto LA, Katerelos M, Levy BG. et al. Bilingual signed and spoken language acquisition from birth: Implications for the mechanisms underlying early bilingual language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 2001; 28: 453-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hadjikakou K, Christodoulou D, Hadjidemetri E. et al. The Experiences of Cypriot Hearing Adults With Deaf Parents in Family, School, and Society. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2009; 14: 486-502
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Preston P. Mother father deaf: the heritage of difference. Social Science & Medicine 1995; 40: 1461-1467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Reich HH, Roth H-J. Hamburger Verfahren zur Analyse des Sprachstands Fünfjähriger - HAVAS 5. Hamburg: Landesinstitut für Lehrerbildung und Schulentwicklung Hamburg; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Uhlig AC. Ethnographie der Gehörlosen. Kultur – Kommunikation – Gemeinschaft. Bielefeld: transcript; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Mitchell R, Karchmer M. Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 2004; 4: 138-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Singleton JL, Tittle MD. Deaf Parents and Their Hearing Children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2000; 5: 221-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wilson M, Emmorey K. No difference in short-term memory span between sign and speech. Psychological Science 2006; 17: 1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lyness CR, Woll B, Campbell R. et al. How does visual language affect crossmodal plasticity and cochlear implant success?. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2013; 37: 2621-2630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 van den Bogaerde B, Baker AE. Bimodal language acquisition in Kodas. In: Bishop M, Hicks SL. , Hrsg. Hearing, mother father deaf: hearing people in deaf families. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press; 2008: 99-13
    Google Scholar