Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Penile Cancer

Abstract

Penile cancer is more common in developing countries and presents unique challenges in treatment, given the psychological impact of surgical treatment options on patients. While clinical assessment of the lesions and nodal disease is critical, imaging does play a role in initial staging, response assessment, and surveillance. This article aims to delineate the guidelines for clinical and radiological evaluation of penile cancers and the approach to disease management.

Keywords

guidelines - imaging - penile cancer - recommendations

Publication History

Article published online:
04 May 2023

• References

• 1 Pow-Sang MR, Ferreira U, Pow-Sang JM, Nardi AC, Destefano V. Epidemiology and natural history of penile cancer. Urology 2010; 76 (2, Suppl 1): S2-S6
• 2 Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC. Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol 2004; 5 (04) 240-247
• 3 Hakenberg OW, Dräger DL, Erbersdobler A, Naumann CM, Jünemann KP, Protzel C. The diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115 (39) 646-652
• 4 Douglawi A, Masterson TA. Updates on the epidemiology and risk factors for penile cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (05) 785-790
• 5 Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 2016; 70 (01) 93-105
• 6 Erbersdobler A. [Pathology and histopathological evaluation of penile cancer]. Urologe A 2018; 57 (04) 391-397
• 7 Clark PE, Spiess PE, Agarwal N. et al; National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Penile cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013; 11 (05) 594-615
• 8 Brierley JE. et al. The TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 8th edition. 2016. Accessed December 8, 2022, at: https://www.uicc.org/resources/tnm-classification-malignant-tumours-8th-edition
• 9 Hakenberg OW. et al. EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer 2022. Accessed December 8, 2022, at:: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/penile-cancer
• 10 Bozzini G, Provenzano M, Romero Otero J. et al. Role of penile Doppler US in the preoperative assessment of penile squamous cell carcinoma patients: results from a large prospective multicenter European study. Urology 2016; 90: 131-135
• 11 Suh CH, Baheti AD, Tirumani SH. et al. Multimodality imaging of penile cancer: what radiologists need to know. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40 (02) 424-435
• 12 Scardino E, Villa G, Bonomo G. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging combined with artificial erection for local staging of penile cancer. Urology 2004; 63 (06) 1158-1162
• 13 Krishna RP, Sistla SC, Smile R, Krishnan R. Sonography: an underutilized diagnostic tool in the assessment of metastatic groin nodes. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36 (04) 212-217
• 14 Solivetti FM, Elia F, Graceffa D, Di Carlo A. Ultrasound morphology of inguinal lymph nodes may not herald an associated pathology. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2012; 31 (01) 88
• 15 Tabatabaei S, Harisinghani M, McDougal WS. Regional lymph node staging using lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxtran-10 in patients with penile cancer. J Urol 2005; 174 (03) 923-927 , discussion 927
• 16 Mueller-Lisse UG, Scher B, Scherr MK, Seitz M. Functional imaging in penile cancer: PET/computed tomography, MRI, and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18 (01) 105-110
• 17 Schlenker B, Scher B, Tiling R. et al. Detection of inguinal lymph node involvement in penile squamous cell carcinoma by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: a prospective single-center study. Urol Oncol 2012; 30 (01) 55-59
• 18 Leijte JAP, Graafland NM, Valdés Olmos RA, van Boven HH, Hoefnagel CA, Horenblas S. Prospective evaluation of hybrid 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in staging clinically node-negative patients with penile carcinoma. BJU Int 2009; 104 (05) 640-644
• 19 Alkatout I, Naumann CM, Hedderich J. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: predicting nodal metastases by histologic grade, pattern of invasion and clinical examination. Urol Oncol 2011; 29 (06) 774-781
• 20 Ottenhof SR, Vegt E. The role of PET/CT imaging in penile cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (05) 833-838
• 21 Zhang W, Gao P, Gao J, Wu X, Liu G, Zhang X. A clinical nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in penile cancer: a SEER-based study. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 640036
• 22 Leijte JAP, Horenblas S. Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?. World J Urol 2009; 27 (02) 151-154
• 23 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Penile Cancer. (Version 1.2022) Accessed December 8, 2022, at:: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/penile.pdf
• 24 Leijte JAP, Kirrander P, Antonini N, Windahl T, Horenblas S. Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients. Eur Urol 2008; 54 (01) 161-168
• 25 Salami SS, Montgomery JS. Surveillance strategies in the management of penile cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (05) 868-873
• 26 Galgano S. et al. Imaging for the initial staging and post-treatment surveillance of penile squamous cell carcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12 (01) 170
• 27 Djajadiningrat RS, Teertstra HJ, van Werkhoven E, van Boven HH, Horenblas S. Ultrasound examination and fine needle aspiration cytology-useful for followup of the regional nodes in penile cancer?. J Urol 2014; 191 (03) 652-655
• 28 Manjunath A, Brenton T, Wylie S, Corbishley CM, Watkin NA. Topical Therapy for non-invasive penile cancer (Tis)-updated results and toxicity. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (05) 803-808
• 29 Imamura M, MacLennan S, Lam TBL. et al. Surgical management for localised penile cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 3: CD011533