Rapid Prototyping and Implementation of Electronic Order Sets for Critically Ill Adults with COVID-19 Admitted to a Children's Hospital

Abstract

Objectives An eight-bed adult coronavirus (COVID-19) critical care (CC) unit was established within our pediatric CC unit (PCCU) when SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) variants increased the CC bed demand. Our objective was to rapidly implement electronic order sets (OSs) to facilitate computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for adult patients admitted within a children's hospital.

Methods OS development began from the assessment of OSs from seven adult CC units. Using a pre-existing PCCU admission template, we created two OSs: adult COVID-19 admission and ongoing care. We tested the prototypes in a multidisciplinary onsite–virtual hybrid tabletop simulation to evaluate usability within established workflows. Participants utilized role-specific profiles within the electronic health record (EHR) training environment which paralleled their computer interface, permitting charting and documentation. EHR analysts were present to gather change requests. Following implementation, we performed twice-daily huddles with end users to identify issues.

Results A total of 13 multidisciplinary bedside providers participated in simulation testing of the prototypes. Two safety issues were addressed before implementation. The electronic OSs were developed, tested, and implemented within 8 days. The postimplementation huddles identified one medication addition, and no deletions were necessary.

Conclusion Caring for adult COVID-19 patients within a freestanding children's hospital presents challenges and has the potential to introduce latent safety threats. Rapid development and implementation of electronic OSs within 8 days to facilitate CPOE and reduce health care provider cognitive burden relied on leveraging functionality within the EMR system, performing iterative testing with a tabletop simulation, integration into previously established workflows, and gathering post-implementation feedback for continuous improvement.

Keywords

clinical decision support - process management tools - specific types - clinical information systems, testing and evaluation - general aspects

Clinical Relevance Statement

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to be able to rapidly increase CC bed capacity, including having flexibility to admit adult patients to children's hospitals. Future situations may evolve when similar flexibility is required and this article describes the rapid development, testing, and implementation of electronic OSs to facilitate CPOE and provide clinical decision support for non-standard patients, with a focus on patient safety and decreasing caregiver cognitive burden.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

We reviewed this case report with our quality improvement specialists, and they deemed this case report to not meet criteria of human subject research.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. Februar 2022

Angenommen: 10. Juli 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Dezember 2022

• References

• 1 Jin Y, Yang H, Ji W. et al. Virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control of COVID-19. Viruses 2020; 12 (04) 372
• 2 Hick JL, Biddinger PD. Novel coronavirus and old lessons - preparing the health system for the pandemic. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (20) e55
• 3 DeClerq K. Ontario reports more than 2,100 new COVID-19 cases for second day, ICU patients surpass 400. Accessed January 25, 2022 at: https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/ontario-reports-more-than-2-100-new-covid-19-cases-for-second-day-icu-patients-surpass-400-1.5363451. Internet. CTVNews; March 26, 2021
• 4 LaVoie J. Toronto's SickKids hospital opening new eight-bed ICU unit for adults with COVID-19. Accessed January 25, 2022 at: https://www.toronto.com/news-story/10367618-toronto-s-sickkids-hospital-opening-new-eight-bed-icu-unit-for-adults-with-covid-19/. Internet. Toronto.com; April 6, 2021
• 5 Neuspiel DR, Taylor MM. Reducing the risk of harm from medication errors in children. Health Serv Insights 2013; 6: 47-59
• 6 Stephenson T. How children's responses to drugs differ from adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 59 (06) 670-673
• 7 Kauffman R. Differences between children and adults. In: Yaffe S. ed. Rational Therapeutics for Infants and Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000: 16-21
• 8 Wright A, Sittig DF, Carpenter JD, Krall MA, Pang JE, Middleton B. Order sets in computerized physician order entry systems: an analysis of seven sites. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010; 2010: 892-896
• 9 Baysari MT, Hardie R-A, Lake R. et al. Longitudinal study of user experiences of a CPOE system in a pediatric hospital. Int J Med Inform 2018; 109: 5-14
• 10 Walsh KE, Landrigan CP, Adams WG. et al. Effect of computer order entry on prevention of serious medication errors in hospitalized children. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (03) e421-e427
• 11 King WJ, Paice N, Rangrej J, Forestell GJ, Swartz R. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics 2003; 112 (3, Pt 1): 506-509
• 12 Collins R. Clinician cognitive overload and its implications for nurse leaders. Nurse Lead 2020; 18 (01) 44-47
• 13 Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, Tsipa A, O'Connor DB. Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review. PLoS One 2016; 11 (07) e0159015
• 14 Connelly TP, Korvek SJ. Computer Order Entry. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022
• 15 Mohan V, Woodcock D, McGrath K. et al. Using simulations to improve electronic health record use, clinician training and patient safety: recommendations from a consensus conference. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2017; 2016: 904-913