Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 72(02): 089-095
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757631
Original Cardiovascular

Proximalization of Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure: Zone 0 or 1 versus Zone 2 or 3 Arch Repair

1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
,
Inderjeet Bhatia
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
,
Tai Leung Daniel Chan
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
,
Wing Kuk Timmy Au
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
,
Ka Lai Cally Ho
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure has changed the landscape of therapy for aortic arch diseases. The optimal landing zone for a FET is controversial. We sought to share our early and midterm results of the FET procedure as well as compare the clinical outcomes of proximal and distal FET anastomosis.

Methods A total of 100 patients who underwent total arch replacement using the FET technique were identified between November 2014 and August 2021. According to the FET anastomosis over the aortic arch, patients were classified into two groups (zone 0/1 vs. zone 2/3). In-hospital mortality, complications, and midterm outcomes were assessed based on patient characteristics.

Results The overall in-hospital mortality was 8%. Major complications occurred in 32% of patients, including spinal cord injury (5%), stroke (7%), and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (7%). Zone 2/3 FET (odds ratio: 6.491, 95% confidence interval: 1.930–21.835, p = 0.003) was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint of major complications. The rate of complete false lumen thrombosis was comparable (64.3% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.567). All patients, patients with zone 0/1 FET, and patients with zone 2/3 FET had 3-year freedom from aorta-related events of 73.0, 70.2, and 75.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences (log-rank test, p = 0.500).

Conclusion Compared with zone 2/3, proximalization of FET using zone 0/1 for anastomosis was associated with better early outcomes and comparable rates of midterm aorta-related events. To substantiate its use, more research on this approach is required.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 May 2022

Accepted: 31 August 2022

Article published online:
10 October 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Shrestha M, Bachet J, Bavaria J. et al. Current status and recommendations for use of the frozen elephant trunk technique: a position paper by the Vascular Domain of EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47 (05) 759-769
  • 2 Mitchell RS, Ishimaru S, Ehrlich MP. et al. First International Summit on Thoracic Aortic Endografting: roundtable on thoracic aortic dissection as an indication for endografting. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9 (2, Suppl 2): II98-II105
  • 3 Detter C, Demal TJ, Bax L. et al. Simplified frozen elephant trunk technique for combined open and endovascular treatment of extensive aortic diseases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56 (04) 738-745
  • 4 Leone A, Di Marco L, Coppola G. et al. Open distal anastomosis in the frozen elephant trunk technique: initial experiences and preliminary results of arch zone 2 versus arch zone 3. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56 (03) 564-571
  • 5 Panfilov DS, Kozlov BN, Pryakhin AS, Kopeva KV. Frozen elephant trunk technique with different proximal landing zone for aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 33 (02) 286-292
  • 6 Yamamoto H, Kadohama T, Yamaura G. et al. Total arch repair with frozen elephant trunk using the ‘zone 0 arch repair’ strategy for type A acute aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; S0022-5223 (19) 30360-5
  • 7 Beckmann E, Martens A, Korte W. et al. Open total arch replacement with trifurcated graft and frozen elephant trunk. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9 (03) 170-177
  • 8 Tsagakis K, Pacini D, Grabenwöger M. et al. Results of frozen elephant trunk from the international E-vita Open registry. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9 (03) 178-188
  • 9 Ouzounian M, Hage A, Chung J. et al; Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative. Hybrid arch frozen elephant trunk repair: evidence from the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9 (03) 189-196
  • 10 Zhang L, Yu C, Yang X. et al. Hybrid and frozen elephant trunk for total arch replacement in DeBakey type I dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 158 (05) 1285-1292
  • 11 Okita Y. Frozen elephant trunk with Frozenix prosthesis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9 (03) 152-163
  • 12 Ho JYK, Chow SCY, Kwok MWT, Fujikawa T, Wong RHL. Total aortic arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 33 (03) 656-662
  • 13 Tian DH, Ha H, Joshi Y, Yan TD. Long-term outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk procedure: a systematic review. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9 (03) 144-151
  • 14 Jakob H, Dohle D, Benedik J. et al. Long-term experience with the E-vita Open hybrid graft in complex thoracic aortic disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 51 (02) 329-338
  • 15 Preventza O, Liao JL, Olive JK. et al. Neurologic complications after the frozen elephant trunk procedure: a meta-analysis of more than 3000 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 160 (01) 20-33.e4
  • 16 Shrestha M, Kaufeld T, Beckmann E. et al. Total aortic arch replacement with a novel 4-branched frozen elephant trunk prosthesis: single-center results of the first 100 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (01) 148-159.e1
  • 17 Katayama A, Uchida N, Katayama K, Arakawa M, Sueda T. The frozen elephant trunk technique for acute type A aortic dissection: results from 15 years of experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47 (02) 355-360 , discussion 360
  • 18 Tsagakis K, Dohle DS, Wendt D. et al. Left subclavian artery rerouting and selective perfusion management in frozen elephant trunk surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2015; 24 (05) 311-316
  • 19 Damberg A, Schälte G, Autschbach R, Hoffman A. Safety and pitfalls in frozen elephant trunk implantation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2 (05) 669-676
  • 20 Tsagakis K, Dohle D, Benedik J, Lieder H, Jakob H. Overall Essen's experience with the E-vita open hybrid stent graft system and evolution of the surgical technique. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2 (05) 612-620
  • 21 Li D, Ye L, He Y. et al. False lumen status in patients with acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5 (05) e003172
  • 22 Shrestha M, Martens A, Kaufeld T. et al. Single-centre experience with the frozen elephant trunk technique in 251 patients over 15 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52 (05) 858-866
  • 23 Berger T, Kreibich M, Morlock J. et al. True-lumen and false-lumen diameter changes in the downstream aorta after frozen elephant trunk implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 54 (02) 375-381
  • 24 Beckmann E, Martens A, Kaufeld T. et al. Is total aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk procedure reasonable in elderly patients?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60 (01) 131-137