Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e318-e323
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755548
Original Article

Race/Ethnicity and Perception of Care: Does Patient–Provider Concordance Matter?

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Nicolás Francone
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Liqi Chen
2   Biostatistical Collaboration Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Lynn M. Yee
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Madeleine Horvath
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
3   Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois
4   Department of Anthropology, The Graduate School, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
› Author Affiliations

Funding This study was supported by the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology resident research funds. In addition, research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, grant number: UL1TR001422. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Preview

Abstract

Objective We determine whether racial concordance between postpartum patients and obstetric providers (dyads) impacts the perception of quality of care among people undergoing intrapartum obstetrical procedures.

Study Design This is a prospective cohort study of postpartum people who underwent operative vaginal or cesarean deliveries in the second stage of labor. Participants were asked to identify the race of their primary provider and complete the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC) survey, which assesses communication, patient-centered decision-making, and interpersonal style. The association of participant-identified patient–provider racial concordance with IPC scores was determined. The primary outcome was the IPC subdomain related to discrimination, and secondary outcomes included other IPC subdomains and IPC results by participant racial identity (Black, LatinX vs. White). Sociodemographic and biomedical data were extracted from the medical record. Bivariable analyses were performed.

Results Of 168 patients who were approached, 107 (63.6%) agreed to participate and 87 (81.3%) completed the survey. The majority (n=49) identified a racially discordant provider. Participants in racially concordant dyads were more likely to be older, White, use English as a primary language, complete a higher degree of education, and have a higher household income when compared with racially discordant dyads. Intrapartum outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Median IPC subtest scores were not significantly different between groups or between racial/ethnic identities.

Conclusion There were no significant differences in perceptions of IPC between racially concordant versus discordant dyads. However, there is an ongoing need to further clarify measures of quality of care in high-acuity obstetrical situations to remediate ongoing racial and ethnic disparities in adverse health outcomes.

Key Points

  • Racial concordance between patient and clinician has been associated with improved quality of care.

  • There are limited data on racial concordance and perceptions of operative obstetrical care (e.g., operative vaginal delivery).

  • Racial concordance was not associated with differences in patient-perceived quality of care associated with operative obstetrics.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 26 November 2021

Accepted: 03 June 2022

Article published online:
02 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA