Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750044
3D-QSAR and Docking Studies on Pyrimidine Derivatives of Second-Generation ALK Inhibitors
Abstract
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a promising target for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Under crizotinib treatment, drug resistance and progressive disease appeared after the point mutations arising in the kinase domain of ALK. Second-generation ALK inhibitors can solve the deficiencies of the first generation, especially the drug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Ceritinib (LDK378), a pyrimidine derivative, for example, can inhibit the activity of ALK with an IC50 value of 40.7 nmol/L, and can experience disease progression after initial treatment with crizotinib. Unfortunately, clear structure–activity relationships have not been identified to date, impeding the rational design of future compounds possessing ALK inhibition activity. To explore interesting insights into the structures of pyrimidine derivatives that influence the activities of the second-generation ALK inhibitors, three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship (3D-QSAR) and molecular docking were performed on a total of 45 derivatives of pyrimidine. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) techniques were used to generate 3D-QSAR models. CoMFA and CoMSIA were performed using the Sybyl X 2.0 package. Molecular docking analysis was performed using the Surflex-Dock module in SYBYL-X 2.0 package. We found in the CoMFA model that the non-cross-validated r2 value was 0.998, the cross-validated q 2 value was 0.663, and the F statistic value was 2,401.970, while the r2 value was 0.988; q 2 value was 0.730, and F value was 542.933 in CoMSIA models, suggesting the good predictability of the CoMFA and CoMSIA models. 3D contour maps and docking results suggested that different groups on the core parts of the compounds could enhance the biological activities. Based on these results, the established 3D-QSAR models and the binding structures of ALK inhibitors obtained favor the prediction of the activity of new inhibitors and will be helpful in the reasonable design of ALK inhibitors in the future.
Publication History
Received: 14 January 2022
Accepted: 29 April 2022
Article published online:
16 August 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Shaw AT, Engelman JA. ALK in lung cancer: past, present, and future. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31 (08) 1105-1111
- 2 Roskoski Jr R. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK): structure, oncogenic activation, and pharmacological inhibition. Pharmacol Res 2013; 68 (01) 68-94
- 3 Katayama R, Lovly CM, Shaw AT. Therapeutic targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in lung cancer: a paradigm for precision cancer medicine. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21 (10) 2227-2235
- 4 Vernersson E, Khoo NK, Henriksson ML, Roos G, Palmer RH, Hallberg B. Characterization of the expression of the ALK receptor tyrosine kinase in mice. Gene Expr Patterns 2006; 6 (05) 448-461
- 5 Tuma RS. ALK gene amplified in most inflammatory breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104 (02) 87-88
- 6 Webb TR, Slavish J, George RE. et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase: role in cancer pathogenesis and small-molecule inhibitor development for therapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2009; 9 (03) 331-356
- 7 Ren H, Tan ZP, Zhu X. et al. Identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase as a potential therapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2012; 72 (13) 3312-3323
- 8 Wang P, Cai J, Chen J. et al. 3D-QSAR and docking studies of piperidine carboxamide derivatives as ALK inhibitors. Med Chem Res 2013; 23 (05) 2576-2583
- 9 Aubry A, Galiacy S, Allouche M. Targeting ALK in cancer: therapeutic potential of proapoptotic peptides. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11 (03) 275
- 10 Wu W, Haderk F, Bivona TG. Non-canonical thinking for targeting ALK-fusion onco-proteins in lung cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9 (12) 164
- 11 Hallberg B, Palmer RH. Mechanistic insight into ALK receptor tyrosine kinase in human cancer biology. Nat Rev Cancer 2013; 13 (10) 685-700
- 12 Ou SI, Zhu VW, Nagasaka M. Catalog of 5′ fusion partners in ALK-positive NSCLC Circa 2020. JTO Clin Res Rep 2020; 1 (01) 100015
- 13 Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Solomon BJ. et al. Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12 (11) 1004-1012
- 14 Doebele RC, Pilling AB, Aisner DL. et al. Mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib in patients with ALK gene rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18 (05) 1472-1482
- 15 Katayama R, Shaw AT, Khan TM. et al. Mechanisms of acquired crizotinib resistance in ALK-rearranged lung cancers. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4 (120) 120ra17
- 16 Zhang S, Wang F, Keats J. et al. Crizotinib-resistant mutants of EML4-ALK identified through an accelerated mutagenesis screen. Chem Biol Drug Des 2011; 78 (06) 999-1005
- 17 Kinoshita K, Oikawa N, Tsukuda T. Chapter nineteen - anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors for the treatment of ALK-positive cancers. Annu Rep Med Chem 2012; 47: 281-293
- 18 Choi YL, Soda M, Yamashita Y. et al. ALK Lung Cancer Study Group. EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (18) 1734-1739
- 19 Sasaki T, Koivunen J, Ogino A. et al. A novel ALK secondary mutation and EGFR signaling cause resistance to ALK kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res 2011; 71 (18) 6051-6060
- 20 Haratake N, Toyokawa G, Seto T. et al. The mechanisms of resistance to second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors and strategies to overcome such resistance. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21 (09) 975-988
- 21 Smolle E, Taucher V, Lindenmann J, Jost PJ, Pichler M. Current knowledge about mechanisms of drug resistance against ALK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13 (04) 699
- 22 Huang WS, Liu S, Zou D. et al. Discovery of Brigatinib (AP26113), a phosphine oxide-containing, potent, orally active inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase. J Med Chem 2016; 59 (10) 4948-4964
- 23 Achary R, Yun JI, Park CM. et al. Discovery of novel tetrahydroisoquinoline-containing pyrimidines as ALK inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 2016; 24 (02) 207-219
- 24 Kang GA, Lee M, Song D. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of novel 2,4-diaminopyrimidines bearing bicyclic aminobenzazepines for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2015; 25 (18) 3992-3998
- 25 Clark M, Cramer III RD, Van Opdenbosch N. Validation of the general purpose Tripos 5.2 force field. J Comput Chem 1989; 10 (08) 982-1012
- 26 Gasteiger J, Marsili M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity—a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 1980; 36 (22) 3219-3228
- 27 Selvaraj C, Tripathi S, Reddy K, Singh SK. Tool development for prediction of pIC50 values from the IC50 values - a pIC50 value calculator. Curr Trends Biotechnol Pharm 2011; 5 (02) 1104-1109
- 28 Marsilje TH, Pei W, Chen B. et al. Synthesis, structure-activity relationships, and in vivo efficacy of the novel potent and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor 5-chloro-N2-(2-isopropoxy-5-methyl-4-(piperidin-4-yl)phenyl)-N4-(2-(isopropylsulfonyl)phenyl)pyrimidine-2,4-diamine (LDK378) currently in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials. J Med Chem 2013; 56 (14) 5675-5690
- 29 Bryan MC, Whittington DA, Doherty EM. et al. Rapid development of piperidine carboxamides as potent and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 2012; 55 (04) 1698-1705
- 30 Robinson DD, Winn PJ, Lyne PD, Richards WG. Self-organizing molecular field analysis: a tool for structure-activity studies. J Med Chem 1999; 42 (04) 573-583
- 31 Cramer RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1988; 110 (18) 5959-5967
- 32 Shen M, LeTiran A, Xiao Y, Golbraikh A, Kohn H, Tropsha A. Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of functionalized amino acid anticonvulsant agents using k nearest neighbor and simulated annealing PLS methods. J Med Chem 2002; 45 (13) 2811-2823
- 33 Verma J, Khedkar VM, Coutinho EC. 3D-QSAR in drug design–a review. Curr Top Med Chem 2010; 10 (01) 95-115
- 34 Kubinyi H. QSAR and 3D QSAR in drug design Part 2: applications and problems. Drug Discov Today 1997; 2 (12) 538-546
- 35 Liu X, Chen X, Zhang L, Zhan P, Liu X. 3D-QSAR and docking studies on piperidine-substituted diarylpyrimidine analogues as HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Med Chem Res 2015; 24 (08) 3314-3326
- 36 Roe SM, Prodromou C, O'Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin. J Med Chem 1999; 42 (02) 260-266