CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de la Mano 2022; 50(01): e12-e18
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743512
Original Article | Artículo Original

Arthroscopic Hemitrapezectomy and Suspension with Mini TightRope for the Treatment of Rhizarthrosis: Outcome in patients in stages Eaton-Littler 2 to 3

Article in several languages: English | español
1   IWAS Faculty, IWC, Chile
2   Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago de Chile, Chile
3   Hand – Microsurgery and Arthroscopy Team, Departament of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Clínica Indisa, Santiago de Chile, Chile
,
3   Hand – Microsurgery and Arthroscopy Team, Departament of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Clínica Indisa, Santiago de Chile, Chile
,
3   Hand – Microsurgery and Arthroscopy Team, Departament of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Clínica Indisa, Santiago de Chile, Chile
,
Eduardo Paz
4   Clínica Indisa, IWAS, IWC INDISA, Chile
,
5   Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
,
3   Hand – Microsurgery and Arthroscopy Team, Departament of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Clínica Indisa, Santiago de Chile, Chile
6   Department of Traumatology, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Chile
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction Rhizarthrosis is a common cause of pain and impaired function of the hand. Most patients present an excellent response to the conservative treatment, although a small percentage requires a surgical procedure due to the persistence of symptoms. Different surgical procedures have been described; however, there is still no consensus in the literature regarding the superiority of one technique over the others.

Objective To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of patients with a diagnosis of rhizarthrosis in stages 2 to 3 of the Eaton-Littler classification, submitted to arthroscopic hemitrapezectomy and suspension with Mini TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, US).

Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the clinical and radiological results of patients operated on through the technique proposed in Clínica INDISA, in Santiago, Chile, between 2017 and 2019. The pre- and postsurgical assessments were performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the Kapandji score. The state of the articular cartilage was also evaluated intraoperatively according to the Badia classification.

Results A total of 12 patients (3 men and 9 women) met the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 56 years, the mean duration of the follow-up was of 21 months. There were 7 patients in stage 2 and 5 in stage 3 according to the Eaton-Littler classification. Intraoperatively, there were 6 patients in stage II and 6 in stage III of the Badia classification. The mean preoperative score on the Kapandji index was of 3.6, and the mean postoperative score was of 9. The mean preoperative score on the VAS was of 8.8, and the mean postoperative score was of 1.2. The mean preoperative score on the DASH was of 33.3, and the mean postoperative score was of 4.7.

Conclusion Arthroscopic and suspension hemitrapezectomy with Mini TightRope for the treatment of stage 2-3 rhizarthrosis is a minimally-invasive, reproducible technique, effective in reducing pain and improving function, with sustained effects on the short and middle terms (6 to 36 months).

Informed Consent

The person in Figure 1 is one of the authors of this article. Informed consent was obtained.


Nivel de evidencia: IV




Publication History

Received: 17 May 2021

Accepted: 18 November 2021

Article published online:
23 June 2022

© 2022. SECMA Foundation. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Ginai AZ, Pols HAP, Hazes JMW, Koes BW. Prevalence and pattern of radiographic hand osteoarthritis and association with pain and disability (the Rotterdam study). Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (05) 682-687 [Internet]
  • 2 Sonne-Holm S, Jacobsen S. Osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: a study of radiology and clinical epidemiology. Results from the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14 (05) 496-500
  • 3 Giddins G. The Nonoperative Management of Hand Fractures in United Kingdom. Hand Clin 2017; 33 (03) 473-487 [Internet]
  • 4 Armstrong AL, Hunter JB, Davis TRC. The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994; 19 (03) 340-341 [Internet]
  • 5 Gottschalk MB, Patel NN, Boden AL, Kakar S. Treatment of Basilar Thumb Arthritis: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2018; 6 (07) e4
  • 6 Pickrell BB, Eberlin KR. Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis. Clin Plast Surg 2019; 46 (03) 407-413 [Internet]
  • 7 Baker RHJ, Al-Shukri J, Davis TRC. Evidence-Based Medicine: Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 256e-266e
  • 8 Pegoli L, Parolo C, Ogawa T, Toh S, Pajardi G. Arthroscopic evaluation and treatment by tendon interpositional arthroplasty of first carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Hand Surg 2007; 12 (01) 35-39
  • 9 Spaans AJ, van Laarhoven CMCM, Schuurman AH, van Minnen LP. Interobserver agreement of the Eaton-Littler classification system and treatment strategy of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (09) 1467-1470 [Internet]
  • 10 Gay AM, Cerlier A, Iniesta A, Legré R. Surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35 (04) 238-249 [Internet]
  • 11 Hamasaki T, Laprise S, Harris PG. et al. Efficacy of Nonsurgical Interventions for Trapeziometacarpal (Thumb Base) Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 (12) 1719-1735
  • 12 Thorkildsen RD, Røkkum M. Trapeziectomy with LRTI or joint replacement for CMC1 arthritis, a randomised controlled trial. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2019; 53 (06) 361-369 [Internet]
  • 13 Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis [Internet]. Vol. 2017 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2015 [cited 2021 May 1].
  • 14 Wilkens SC, Bargon CA, Mohamadi A, Chen NC, Coert JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of arthroscopic assisted techniques for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43 (10) 1098-1105
  • 15 Wong CW, Ho PC. Arthroscopic Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis. Hand Clin 2017; 33 (04) 795-812 [Internet]
  • 16 Eaton RG, Littler JW. Ligament reconstruction for the painful thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55 (08) 1655-1666
  • 17 Corella F, Ocampos M, Laredo R, Tabuenca J, Carnicer M, Larrainzar-Garijo R. Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy and Suture Button Suspensionplasty: A Review of the Literature and Description of the “Three-Step Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy Technique”. J Wrist Surg 2020; 9 (05) 366-381
  • 18 Yao J. Suture-button suspensionplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (04) 579-585
  • 19 Kapandji A. Cotation clinique de l'opposition et de la contre-opposition du pouce. Ann Chir Main 1986; 5 (01) 67-73 [Internet]
  • 20 Badia A. Trapeziometacarpal arthroscopy: a classification and treatment algorithm. Hand Clin 2006; 22 (02) 153-163
  • 21 Culp RW, Rekant MS. The role of arthroscopy in evaluating and treating trapeziometacarpal disease. Vol. 17, Hand Clinics. Elsevier; 2001: 315-319
  • 22 Culp RW, Rekant MS. The role of arthroscopy in evaluating and treating trapeziometacarpal disease. Hand Clin 2001; 17 (02) 315-319, x–xi
  • 23 Yao J, Cheah AEJ. Mean 5-Year Follow-up for Suture Button Suspensionplasty in the Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (07) 569.e1-569.e11 [Internet]
  • 24 Özçelik İB, Uğurlar M, Sarı A. Arthroscopic Hemitrapeziectomy and Suture Button Suspensionplasty in the Treatment of First Carpometacarpal Joint Eaton-Littler Stage 2-3 Arthrosis. J Wrist Surg 2019; 8 (02) 132-138 [Internet]
  • 25 DeGeorge Jr BR, Chawla SS, Elhassan BT, Kakar S. Basilar Thumb Arthritis: The Utility of Suture-Button Suspensionplasty. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14 (01) 66-72 [Internet]