First reports of esophageal adenocarcinoma with white globe appearance in Japanese and Caucasian patients

Background and study aims: Better endoscopic diagnosis in case of Barrett’s esophagus is still needed. White globe appearance (WGA) is a novel endoscopic marker for gastric adenocarcinoma, with high sensitivity for differentiating between gastric cancer/high-grade dysplasia and other lesions. We report 2 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma with WGA. In Case 1, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed a 10-mm esophageal adenocarcinoma in a 48-year-old Japanese woman with short-segment Barrett’s esophagus. A small (< 1 mm) white globular lesion, typical of WGA, was observed under the epithelium by magnifying narrow-band imaging. A dilated neoplastic gland with eosinophilic material and necrotic epithelial fragments was identified at the site of the WGA by histologic examination. In Case 2, EGD revealed a 5-mm esophageal adenocarcinoma in a 60-year-old Caucasian man with long-segment Barrett’s esophagus. A typical WGA was observed by magnifying narrow-band imaging and similar histologic findings were identified at the site of the WGA. WGA could be a reliable endoscopic finding for target biopsy in esophageal adenocarcinoma, if its specificity is as high as in gastric cancer. The clinical implications of WGA in patients with Barrett’s esophagus should be investigated further.

• References

• 1 Rubenstein JH, Shaheen NJ. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 302-317
• 2 Doyama H, Yoshida N, Tsuyama S et al. The “white globe appearance” (WGA): a novel marker for a correct diagnosis of early gastric cancer by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI). Endosc Int Open 2015; 03: E120-E124
• 3 Yoshida N, Doyama H, Nakanishi H et al. White globe appearance is a novel specific endoscopic marker for gastric cancer: A prospective study. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 59-66
• 4 Watanabe Y, Shimizu M, Itoh T et al. Intraglandular necrotic debris in gastric biopsy and surgical specimens. Ann Diagn Pathol 2001; 5: 141-147
• 5 Jass JR. Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology 2007; 50: 113-130
• 6 Caruso RA, Napoli P, Nania A et al. Mitochondrion-rich differentiated adenocarcinomas of the stomach: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and electron microscopy study of nine cases. Virchows Arch 2010; 456: 499-505
• 7 Dutta S, Going JJ, Crumley AB et al. The relationship between tumour necrosis, tumour proliferation, local and systemic inflammation, microvessel density and survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 2012; 106: 702-710
• 8 Bronner MP. Barrett’s esophagus. The Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2014; 14: 131-162
• 9 Kannuna H, Rubio CA, Silverio PC et al. DOME/GALT type adenocarcinoma of the colon: a case report, literature review and a unified phenotypic categorization. Diagn Pathol 2015; 10: 92-99