Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38(03): 311-314
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742221
Original Research

Operating Room Noise and Team Communication during Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Multicenter Study

Marc Levin
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Matthew Brace
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Doron D. Sommer
2   Division of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Michael Roskies
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Operating room (OR) noise contributes to team miscommunication. In facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS), many cases are completed under sedation. This creates a unique environment wherein patients are aware of OR noise. The objectives of this study were to quantify noise and evaluate team members' perspectives on communication inside of FPRS ORs. This study was completed across three surgical institutions. Objective noise measurements were recorded with SoundMeter X. A communication questionnaire was delivered to OR team members following each case. Four hundred and twenty-three noise measurements were recorded during facelift/neck, eye/brow, rhinoplasty, and fat transfer/lip surgeries. The mean and maximum noise levels were 66.1 dB (dB) and 87.6 dB, respectively. Measurements during cases with general anesthetic (221/423, 52.2%) had higher noise measurements (70.3 dB) compared with those with sedation (202/423, 47.8%) (69.7 dB) (p = 0.04). The OR was louder with suction on (72.3 dB) versus off (69.3 dB) (p <0.00). Suction (34.5%) and music (22.4%) were the largest noise contributors according to questionnaire replies. Intraoperative noise, awake patients, and suctions/music may negatively impact FPRS OR communication. Innovation to improve FPRS intraoperative communication should be considered for effective patient care.

Keywords

OR noise - HVAC - OR communication - personal protective equipment - facial plastic and reconstructive surgery


Publication History

Article published online:
27 January 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Keller S, Tschan F, Beldi G, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Semmer NK. Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room. An observational study. Ergonomics 2016; 59 (12) 1541-1552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Padmakumar AD, Cohen O, Churton A, Groves JB, Mitchell DA, Brennan PA. Effect of noise on tasks in operating theatres: a survey of the perceptions of healthcare staff. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 55 (02) 164-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cheriyan S, Mowery H, Ruckle D. et al. The impact of operating room noise upon communication during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Endourol 2016; 30 (10) 1062-1066
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hasfeldt D, Laerkner E, Birkelund R. Noise in the operating room—what do we know? A review of the literature. J Perianesth Nurs 2010; 25 (06) 380-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tsiou C, Efthymiatos G, Katostaras T. Noise in the operating rooms of Greek hospitals. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123 (02) 757-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fritsch MH, Chacko CE, Patterson EB. Operating room sound level hazards for patients and physicians. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (05) 715-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chen B, Wang Y, Wang D, Wang Z. Evaluation of safety on the noise of drills in the tympanoplasty. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 2004; 18 (01) 4-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kurmann A, Peter M, Tschan F, Mühlemann K, Candinas D, Beldi G. Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2011; 98 (07) 1021-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Love H. Noise exposure in the orthopaedic operating theatre: a significant health hazard. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (10) 836-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Levin M, Zhou K, Sommer EC, McHugh T, Sommer DD. Ambient noise levels and wireless headsets for communication in aerosolizing otolaryngology surgery during COVID-19. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 165 (04) 528-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kardous CA, Shaw PB. Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135 (04) EL186-EL192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Drzymalski DM, Ceruzzi J, Camann WR. Noise in the obstetric operating room. Int J Obstet Anesth 2017; 29: 87-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Levin M, Zhou K, Sommer EC. et al. Noise in endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery operating rooms. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2021; 35 (04) 541-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sampieri G, Namavarian A, Levin M. et al. Noise in otolaryngology—head and neck surgery operating rooms: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 50 (01) 8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Levin M, Lee Y. A novel wireless in-ear device for surgical care: an innovative idea to improve operating room miscommunication. Surg Innov 2019; 26 (01) 134-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Engelmann CR, Neis JP, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Ure BM. A noise-reduction program in a pediatric operation theatre is associated with surgeon's benefits and a reduced rate of complications: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259 (05) 1025-1033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Friedrich MG, Tirilomis T, Kollmeier JM, Wang Y, Hanekop GG. Modifications of surgical suction tip geometry for flow optimisation: influence on suction-induced noise pollution. Surg Res Pract 2018; 2018: 3074819
    PubMedGoogle Scholar