Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741501
Three-Dimensional Technology in Rhinoplasty
Abstract
Rhinoplasty is uniquely suited to capitalize on different aspects of three-dimensional (3D) modeling technology. Currently, 3D surface imaging of preoperative and postoperative nasal structure provides a platform for better surgical planning and patient counselling as well as objective postoperative measurements. Physical nasal models using 3D printing technology can improve rhinoplasty performance intraoperatively, postoperative outcomes, together with nasal prosthetic manufacture, by tailoring to specific patient anatomy. Advances in tissue engineering using 3D-printed biocompatible scaffolds have shown excellent nasal cartilage mimicry and hold promise for increasingly versatile directed tissue regeneration in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstructive surgery. As health care innovations are expected to become increasingly common in standard rhinoplasty practices in the future, we give an account of how 3D technologies can create new opportunities to optimize surgical planning and improve overall the patient experience.
Publication History
Article published online:
03 February 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Rankin M, Borah GL, Perry AW, Wey PD. Quality-of-life outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (06) 2139-2145 , discussion 2146–2147
- 2 Ward B, Ward M, Fried O, Paskhover B. Nasal distortion in short-distance photographs: the selfie effect. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (04) 333-335
- 3 Eggerstedt M, Schumacher J, Urban MJ, Smith RM, Revenaugh PC. The selfie view: perioperative photography in the digital age. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (03) 1066-1070
- 4 Hilger PA, Webster RC, Hilger JA, Smith RC. A computerized nasal analysis system. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109 (10) 653-661
- 5 Larrabee Jr WF, Maupin G, Sutton D. Profile analysis in facial plastic surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1985; 111 (10) 682-687
- 6 Sharp HR, Tingay RS, Coman S, Mills V, Roberts DN. Computer imaging and patient satisfaction in rhinoplasty surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116 (12) 1009-1013
- 7 Vuyk HD, Stroomer J, Vinayak B. The role of computer imaging in facial plastic surgery consultation: a clinical study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998; 23 (03) 235-243
- 8 Thomas JR, Freeman MS, Remmler DJ, Ehlert TK. Analysis of patient response to preoperative computerized video imaging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115 (07) 793-796
- 9 Lekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton III GS, Hellings PW. Three-dimensional surface imaging and the continuous evolution of preoperative and postoperative assessment in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (01) 88-94
- 10 Weissler JM, Stern CS, Schreiber JE, Amirlak B, Tepper OM. The evolution of photography and three-dimensional imaging in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 761-769
- 11 Lekakis G, Hens G, Claes P, Hellings PW. Three-dimensional morphing and its added value in the rhinoplasty consult. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (01) e2063
- 12 Chávez AE, Dagum P, Koch RJ, Newman JP. Legal issues of computer imaging in plastic surgery: a primer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (06) 1601-1608
- 13 Honrado CP, Larrabee Jr WF. Update in three-dimensional imaging in facial plastic surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12 (04) 327-331
- 14 Robotti E, Daniel RK, Leone F. Cone-beam computed tomography: a user-friendly, practical roadmap to the planning and execution of every rhinoplasty—a 5-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (05) 749e-762e
- 15 VanKoevering KK, Zopf DA, Hollister SJ. Tissue engineering and 3-dimensional modeling for facial reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (01) 151-161
- 16 Goiato MC, Santos MR, Pesqueira AA, Moreno A, dos Santos DM, Haddad MF. Prototyping for surgical and prosthetic treatment. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (03) 914-917
- 17 Palousek D, Rosicky J, Koutny D. Use of digital technologies for nasal prosthesis manufacturing. Prosthet Orthot Int 2014; 38 (02) 171-175
- 18 Suszynski TM, Serra JM, Weissler JM, Amirlak B. Three-dimensional printing in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (06) 1383-1385
- 19 Onerci Altunay Z, Bly JA, Edwards PK. et al. Three-dimensional printing of large nasal septal perforations for optimal prosthetic closure. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016; 30 (04) 287-29
- 20 Ziegler JP, Oyer SL. Prelaminated paramedian forehead flap for subtotal nasal reconstruction using three-dimensional printing. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14 (01) 20210126
- 21 Jung JW, Ha DH, Kim BY. et al. Nasal reconstruction using a customized three-dimensional-printed stent for congenital arhinia: three-year follow-up. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (03) 582-585
- 22 Choi JW, Kim MJ, Kang MK. et al. Clinical application of a patient-specific, three-dimensional printing guide based on computer simulation for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 365-374
- 23 Guevara C, Matouk M. In-office 3D printed guide for rhinoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 50 (12) 1563–1565
- 24 Sharma A, Janus J, Diggelmann HR, Hamilton III GS. Healing septal perforations by secondary intention using acellular dermis as a bioscaffold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2015; 124 (06) 425-429
- 25 Nam JH, Lee SY, Khan G, Park ES. Validation of the optimal scaffold pore size of nasal implants using the 3-dimensional culture technique. Arch Plast Surg 2020; 47 (04) 310-316
- 26 Ruiz-Cantu L, Gleadall A, Faris C, Segal J, Shakesheff K, Yang J. Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 2020; 109: 110578
- 27 Cao Y, Sang S, An Y, Xiang C, Li Y, Zhen Y. Progress of 3D printing techniques for nasal cartilage regeneration. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; Jul 26;
- 28 Yi HG, Choi YJ, Jung JW. et al. Three-dimensional printing of a patient-specific engineered nasal cartilage for augmentative rhinoplasty. J Tissue Eng 2019; 10: 2041731418824797
- 29 Fulco I, Miot S, Haug MD. et al. Engineered autologous cartilage tissue for nasal reconstruction after tumour resection: an observational first-in-human trial. Lancet 2014; 384 (9940): 337-346
- 30 Schoonraad SA, Fischenich KM, Eckstein KN. et al. Biomimetic and mechanically supportive 3D printed scaffolds for cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering using photopolymers and digital light processing. Biofabrication 2021;13(04):
- 31 Asnaghi MA, Power L, Barbero A. et al. Biomarker signatures of quality for engineering nasal chondrocyte-derived cartilage. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8: 283
- 32 VanKoevering KK, Hollister SJ, Green GE. Advances in 3-dimensional printing in otolaryngology: a review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (02) 178-183
- 33 Zammit D, Safran T, Ponnudurai N. et al. Step-specific simulation: the utility of 3D printing for the fabrication of a low-cost, learning needs-based rhinoplasty simulator. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (06) NP340-NP345
- 34 Chen G, Jiang M, Coles-Black J, Mansour K, Chuen J, Amott D. Three-dimensional printing as a tool in otolaryngology training: a systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 2020; 134 (01) 14-19
- 35 Pallanch J. Introduction to 3D imaging technologies for the facial plastic surgeon. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (04) xv-xvi , vii
- 36 Hong EM, Hakimi AA, Ho D, Torkian BA, Wong BJF. Evaluating open source software for 3D imaging and morphing in cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. Laryngoscope 2021; 131 (02) 299-303