Methods Inf Med 2021; 60(05/06): 171-179
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736664
Original Article

Evaluation Metrics for Health Chatbots: A Delphi Study

Kerstin Denecke
1  School of Engineering and Computer Science, Institute for Medical Informatics, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Biel, Switzerland
,
Alaa Abd-Alrazaq
2  Division of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar
,
Mowafa Househ
2  Division of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar
,
Jim Warren
3  Faculty of Science, School of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background In recent years, an increasing number of health chatbots has been published in app stores and described in research literature. Given the sensitive data they are processing and the care settings for which they are developed, evaluation is essential to avoid harm to users. However, evaluations of those systems are reported inconsistently and without using a standardized set of evaluation metrics. Missing standards in health chatbot evaluation prevent comparisons of systems, and this may hamper acceptability since their reliability is unclear.

Objectives The objective of this paper is to make an important step toward developing a health-specific chatbot evaluation framework by finding consensus on relevant metrics.

Methods We used an adapted Delphi study design to verify and select potential metrics that we retrieved initially from a scoping review. We invited researchers, health professionals, and health informaticians to score each metric for inclusion in the final evaluation framework, over three survey rounds. We distinguished metrics scored relevant with high, moderate, and low consensus. The initial set of metrics comprised 26 metrics (categorized as global metrics, metrics related to response generation, response understanding and aesthetics).

Results Twenty-eight experts joined the first round and 22 (75%) persisted to the third round. Twenty-four metrics achieved high consensus and three metrics achieved moderate consensus. The core set for our framework comprises mainly global metrics (e.g., ease of use, security content accuracy), metrics related to response generation (e.g., appropriateness of responses), and related to response understanding. Metrics on aesthetics (font type and size, color) are less well agreed upon—only moderate or low consensus was achieved for those metrics.

Conclusion The results indicate that experts largely agree on metrics and that the consensus set is broad. This implies that health chatbot evaluation must be multifaceted to ensure acceptability.

Author's Contributions

J.W. and K.D. developed the study concept and protocol. A.A.-A. and K.D. conducted the study with the guidance of M.H. and J.W. A.A.-A. and K.D. drafted the manuscript; A.A.-A. summarized the study results; J.W. and K.D. interpreted the results and drew conclusions. The manuscript was revised critically for important intellectual content by all the authors. All authors approved the manuscript for publication and agreed to be accountable for all the aspects of the work.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 27 June 2021

Accepted: 10 September 2021

Publication Date:
31 October 2021 (online)

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany