An Attempt to Estimate the Noises in Homeopathic Pathogenetic Trials by Employing the Jaccard Similarity Index and Noise Index

Abstract

Background The critical task of researchers conducting double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled homeopathic pathogenetic trials is to segregate the signals from the noises. The noises are signs and symptoms due to factors other than the trial drug; signals are signs and symptoms due to the trial drug. Unfortunately, the existing tools (criteria for a causal association of symptoms only with the tested medicine, qualitative pathogenetic index, quantitative pathogenetic index, pathogenic index) have limitations in analyzing the symptoms of the placebo group as a comparator, resulting in inadequate segregation of the noises. Hence, the Jaccard similarity index and the Noise index are proposed for analyzing the symptoms of the placebo group as a comparator.

Methods The Jaccard similarity index is the ratio of the number of common elements among the placebo and intervention groups to the aggregated number of elements in these groups. The Noise index is the ratio of common elements among the placebo and intervention group to the total elements of the intervention group. Homeopathic pathogenetic trials of Plumbum metallicum, Piper methysticum and Hepatitis C nosode were selected for experimenting with the computation of the Jaccard similarity index and the Noise index.

Results Jaccard similarity index calculations show that 8% of Plumbum metallicum's elements, 10.7% of Piper methysticum's elements, and 19.3% of Hepatitis C nosode's elements were similar to the placebo group when elements of both the groups (intervention and placebo) were aggregated. Noise index calculations show that 10.7% of Plumbum metallicum's elements, 13.9% of Piper methysticum's elements and 25.7% of Hepatitis C nosode's elements were similar to those of the placebo group.

Conclusion The Jaccard similarity index and the Noise index might be considered an additional approach for analyzing the symptoms of the placebo group as a comparator, resulting in better noise segregation in homeopathic pathogenetic trials.

Keywords

Jaccard similarity index - Homeopathic pathogenetic trials - Noise index

Publication History

Received: 30 March 2021

Accepted: 15 August 2021

Article published online:
27 December 2021

• References

• 1 Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine—A New Translation. 1st ed.. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher Inc; 1982
• 2 Dantas F. How can we get more reliable information from homoeopathic pathogenetic trials? A critique of provings. Br Homeopath J 1996; 85: 230-236
• 3 Dantas F, Fisher P, Rastogi DPP. et al. Authors' response: we must distinguish symptoms caused by the medicine from other symptoms. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 275-276
• 4 Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis 1979; 32: 51-63
• 5 Signorini A, Lubrano A, Manuele G. et al. Classical and new proving methodology: provings of Plumbum metallicum and Piper methysticum and comparison with a classical proving of Plumbum metallicum . Homeopathy 2005; 94: 164-174
• 6 Shah R. Quantitative and qualitative pathogenetic indices for review of data derived from homeopathic pathogenetic trials. Homeopathy 2018; 107: 274-279
• 7 Fisher P, Dantas F. Homeopathic pathogenetic trials of Acidum malicum and Acidum ascorbicum . Br Homeopath J 2001; 90: 118-125
• 8 Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM. et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30: 239-245
• 9 Hwang C-M, Yang M-S, Hung W-L. New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the Jaccard index with its application to clustering. Int J Intell Syst 2018; 33: 1672-1688
• 10 Jaccard P. The distribution of the flora in the Alpine zone. New Phytol 1912; 11: 37-50
• 11 Shi R, Ngan KN, Li S. Jaccard index compensation for object segmentation evaluation. Paper presented at: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).; 2014: 4457-4461
• 12 Von Boenninghausen C. Therapeutic Pocket Book. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers Private Limited; 2003
• 13 Verma V, Aggarwal RK. A comparative analysis of similarity measures akin to the Jaccard index in collaborative recommendations: empirical and theoretical perspective. Soc Netw Analysis Min 2020; 10: 43
• 14 Berndt BC, Brualdi RA. Introductory combinatorics. Am Math Mon 1980; 87: 498 . Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21990
• 15 Inclusion-Exclusion Principle. Examples with Solutions. Comp Sci Station. Accessed February 24, 2021 at: https://compscistation.com/inclusion-exclusion-principle-examples/
• 16 Shah R. Hepatitis C nosode: the preparation and homeopathic pathogenetic trial. Homeopathy 2013; 102: 207-214
• 17 A Simple Explanation of the Jaccard Similarity Index. Accessed July 13, 2021 at: https://www.statology.org/jaccard-similarity/
• 18 Glen S. Jaccard Index/Similarity Coefficient. StatisticsHowTo.com: Elementary Statistics for the rest of us! Accessed February 17, 2021 at: https://www.statisticshowto.com/jaccard-index/
• 19 Signorini A. We need repetition of HPTs. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 277
• 20 Hering C. The Guiding Symptoms of Our Materia Medica. Philadelphia: American Homoeopathic Publishing Society, J.M. Stoddart & Co.; 1879: 1800-1880
• 21 Kaptchuk TJ, Miller FG. Placebo effects in medicine. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 8-9