J Knee Surg 2023; 36(04): 439-444
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735313
Original Article

The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain

1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York
,
David Yeroushalmi
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York
,
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York
,
Morteza Meftah
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York
,
Erik Schnaser
2   Desert Orthopedic Center, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, California
,
Ran Schwarzkopf
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

The use of intraoperative technology (IT), such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and robot-assisted surgery (RA), in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly popular due to its ability to enhance surgical precision and reduce radiographic outliers. There is disputing evidence as to whether IT leads to better clinical outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if use of CAN or RA in TKA improves pain outcomes. This is a retrospective review of a multicenter randomized control trial of 327 primary TKAs. Demographics, surgical time, IT use (CAN/RA), length of stay (LOS), and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) were collected. Analysis was done by comparing IT (n = 110) to a conventional TKA cohort (n = 217). When accounting for demographic differences and the use of a tourniquet, the IT cohort had shorter surgical time (88.77 ± 18.57 vs. 98.12 ± 22.53 minutes; p = 0.005). While postoperative day 1 pain scores were similar (p = 0.316), the IT cohort has less opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.006) and 1 month (p = 0.005) postoperatively, but not at 3 months (p = 0.058). When comparing different types of IT, CAN, and RA, we found that they had similar surgical times (p = 0.610) and pain scores (p = 0.813). Both cohorts had similar opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.092), 1 month (p = 0.058), and 3 months (p = 0.064) postoperatively. The use of IT in TKA does not yield a clinically significant reduction in pain outcomes. There was also no difference in pain or perioperative outcomes between CAN and RA technology used in TKA.



Publication History

Received: 22 December 2020

Accepted: 22 July 2021

Article published online:
16 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (03) 262-267
  • 2 Hofmann AA, Heithoff SM, Camargo M. Cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002: 102-107
  • 3 Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2353-2363
  • 4 Dalury DF, Barrett WP, Mason JB, Goldstein WM, Murphy JA, Roche MW. Midterm survival of a contemporary modular total knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1970 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (12) 1594-1596
  • 5 Crowder AR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (07, Suppl 3): 12-16
  • 6 Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckardt A. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (05) 573-579
  • 7 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., vol. 464. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007: 111-126
  • 8 Tolk JJ, Koot HWJ, Janssen RPA. Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (04) 347-352
  • 9 Bae DK, Song SJ. Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3 (04) 259-267
  • 10 Parisi TJ, Jennings JM, Dennis DA. Coronal alignment in TKA: traditional principles versus new concepts. Reconstr Rev 2018;8;
  • 11 Clark TC, Schmidt FH. Robot-assisted navigation versus computer-assisted navigation in primary total knee arthroplasty: efficiency and accuracy. ISRN Orthop 2013; 2013: 794827
  • 12 Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs. conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (06) 1177-1182
  • 13 Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (04) 560-569
  • 14 Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A. et al. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (04) 765-771
  • 15 Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (07, Suppl 3): 132-138
  • 16 Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ, Goddard MS, Smith BP, Mofidi A. et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Jt Surg 2011; 93 B: 1296-1299
  • 17 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; ;PAP 111-116
  • 18 van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (11) 3482-3495
  • 19 Kim YH, Yoon SH, Park JW. Does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478 (02) 266-275
  • 20 Jeon SW, Kim KI, Song SJ. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty does not improve long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 1656-1661
  • 21 McCarthy Deering E, Hu S, Abdulkarim A. Pain and tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Proc 2018
  • 22 Tai TW, Chang CW, Lai KA, Lin CJ, Yang CY. Effects of tourniquet use on blood loss and soft-tissue damage in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (24) 2209-2215
  • 23 Clarke MT, Longstaff L, Edwards D, Rushton N. Tourniquet-induced wound hypoxia after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (01) 40-44
  • 24 Huang PS, Copp SN. Oral opioids are overprescribed in the opiate-naive patient undergoing total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27 (15) e702-e708
  • 25 Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (05) 682-687
  • 26 Burnett RSJ, Barrack RL. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 264-276
  • 27 Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad FS. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4 (10) 611-617
  • 28 Sires JD, Wilson CJ. CT validation of intraoperative implant position and knee alignment as determined by the MAKO total knee arthroplasty system. J Knee Surg 2020;
  • 29 Meding JB, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Galley MR, Malinzak RA. Intramedullary vs. extramedullary femoral alignment guides: a 15-year follow-up of survivorship. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (04) 591-595
  • 30 Alfred J, Tria J, Giles RScuderi, Fred DCushner. Complex Cases in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018
  • 31 Ren Y, Cao S, Wu J, Weng X, Feng B. Efficacy and reliability of active robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J 2019; 95 (1121): 125-133
  • 32 Song E-K, Seon J-K, Yim J-H, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 118-126
  • 33 Denawa Y, Kurtz W, Conermann T. The social and functional implications of high- versus low-dose opioids on chronic non-cancer pain. Pain Physician 2019; 22 (04) 401-411
  • 34 Kobus AM, Smith DH, Morasco BJ. et al. Correlates of higher-dose opioid medication use for low back pain in primary care. J Pain 2012; 13 (11) 1131-1138
  • 35 Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (04) 477-480
  • 36 Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B (07) 930-937