Is MRI Overutilized for Evaluation of Knee Pain in Veterans?

Abstract

MRI is an essential diagnostic imaging modality for many knee conditions; however, it is not indicated in the setting of advanced knee arthritis. Inappropriate MRI imaging adds to health care costs and may delay definitive management for many patients. The primary purpose of this study was to ascertain the frequency of inappropriate MRI scans performed at one Veterans' Administration Medical Center (VAMC). We performed a retrospective chart review of all knee MRIs ordered over a 6-month period. Inappropriate MRI was defined as MRI performed prior to radiographs (XRs), or in the presence of XRs demonstrating severe osteoarthritis, without leading to a nonarthroplasty procedure of the knee. Of the 304 cases reviewed, 36.8% (112) of the MRIs were deemed inappropriate, 33 were ordered by orthopedists, and 79 were ordered by other health care providers. Of the 33 ordered by orthopedists, 25 were ordered by retired/nonsurgical orthopedists. Obtaining an MRI delayed care by an average of 29.2 days. Of the 252 cases that had XR prior to MRI, none included all four views in the standard knee XR series and only four had weightbearing images. Over a third of knee MRIs performed at this VAMC were inappropriate and delayed care. Additionally, no XRs in our study contained all the necessary views to properly assess knee arthritis. These concerning findings signify a potential opportunity for education in diagnostic strategies, to better patient care and resource utilization in the VAMC.

Keywords

MRI - osteoarthritis - knee pain - veterans

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 21. Juni 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. September 2021

• References

• 1 Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS. et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (17) 1386-1397
• 2 Dominick KL, Golightly YM, Jackson GL. Arthritis prevalence and symptoms among US non-veterans, veterans, and veterans receiving Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare. J Rheumatol 2006; 33 (02) 348-354
• 3 Losina E, Paltiel AD, Weinstein AM. et al. Lifetime medical costs of knee osteoarthritis management in the United States: impact of extending indications for total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015; 67 (02) 203-215
• 4 Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95 (05) 986-995.e1
• 5 Weinstein AM, Rome BN, Reichmann WM. et al. Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (05) 385-392
• 6 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16 (04) 494-502
• 7 Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D. et al; Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29 (08) 1039-1049
• 8 Vignon E, Conrozier T, Piperno M, Richard S, Carrillon Y, Fantino O. Radiographic assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Recommendations: recommended guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7 (04) 434-436
• 9 Duncan ST, Khazzam MS, Burnham JM, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Wright RW. Sensitivity of standing radiographs to detect knee arthritis: a systematic review of Level I studies. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (02) 321-328
• 10 Babatunde OM, Danoff JR, Patrick Jr DA, Lee JH, Kazam JK, Macaulay W. The Combination of the Tunnel View and Weight-Bearing Anteroposterior Radiographs Improves the Detection of Knee Arthritis. Arthritis (Egypt) 2016; 2016: 9786924
• 11 Jazrawi LM, Alaia MJ, Chang G, Fitzgerald EF, Recht MP. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (07) 420-429
• 12 Iglehart JK. The new era of medical imaging–progress and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (26) 2822-2828
• 13 Solivetti FM, Guerrisi A, Salducca N. et al. Appropriateness of knee MRI prescriptions: clinical, economic and technical issues. Radiol Med (Torino) 2016; 121 (04) 315-322
• 14 Emery DJ, Shojania KG, Forster AJ, Mojaverian N, Feasby TE. Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173 (09) 823-825
• 15 The American College of Radiology. 2010 ACR–SSR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee. Avaialble at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/mr-knee.pdf
• 16 Sherman SL, Gulbrandsen TR, Lewis HA. et al. Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of moderate to severe osteoarthritis. Iowa Orthop J 2018; 38: 33-37
• 17 Englund M, Guermazi A, Gale D. et al. Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (11) 1108-1115
• 18 Liu TC, Leung N, Edwards L, Ring D, Bernacki E, Tonn MD. Patients older than 40 years with unilateral occupational claims for new shoulder and knee symptoms have bilateral MRI changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (10) 2360-2365
• 19 Song YD, Jain NP, Kim SJ. et al. Is knee magnetic resonance imaging overutilized in current practice?. Knee Surg Relat Res 2015; 27 (02) 95-100
• 20 Fox MG, Chang EY, Amini B. et al; Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR appropriateness criteria chronic knee pain. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (11S): S302-S312
• 21 Perera NS, Joel J, Bunola JA. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: delay to diagnosis. Injury 2013; 44 (12) 1862-1865
• 22 Sathiyakumar V, Jahangir AA, Mir HR. et al. Patterns of costs and spending among orthopedic surgeons across the United States: a national survey. Am J Orthop 2014; 43 (01) E7-E13
• 23 Issa K, Jauregui JJ, McElroy M, Banerjee S, Kapadia BH, Mont MA. Unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging of hips: an economic burden to patients and the healthcare system. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (10) 1911-1914
• 24 Wylie JD, Makarewich CA, Working ZM. et al. Findings associated with knee pathology on MRI in patients without osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (11) 780-786
• 25 Amin N, McIntyre L, Carter T, Xerogeanes J, Voigt J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of needle arthroscopy versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal tears of the knee. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (02) 554-562.e13
• 26 Bradley SM, O'Donnell CI, Grunwald GK. et al. Facility-level variation in hospitalization, mortality, and costs in the 30 days after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights on short-term healthcare value from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System (VA CART) Program. Circulation 2015; 132 (02) 101-108
• 27 Taylor BC, Hagel Campbell E, Nugent S. et al. Three year trends in veterans health administration utilization and costs after traumatic brain injury screening among veterans with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2017; 34 (17) 2567-2574
• 28 Schweizer ML, Cullen JJ, Perencevich EN, Vaughan Sarrazin MS. Costs associated with surgical site infections in Veterans Affairs Hospitals. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (06) 575-581
• 29 Lee D, Begley CE. Delays in seeking health care: comparison of veterans and the general population. J Public Health Manag Pract 2017; 23 (02) 160-168
• 30 Valsangkar NP, Eppstein AC, Lawson RA, Taylor AN. Effect of lean processes on surgical wait times and efficiency in a tertiary care Veterans Affairs Medical Center. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (01) 42-47
• 31 Stroupe KT, Martinez R, Hogan TP. et al. Experiences with the Veterans' Choice Program. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (10) 2141-2149
• 32 Bernstein J, Cain EL, Kneeland JB, Dalinka MK. The incidence of pathology detected by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: differences based on the specialty of the requesting physician. Orthopedics 2003; 26 (05) 483-485
• 33 van Oudenaarde K, Swart NM, Bloem JL. et al. General practitioners referring adults to MR imaging for knee pain: a randomized controlled trial to assess cost-effectiveness. Radiology 2018; 288 (01) 170-176
• 34 DAMASK (Direct Access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessment for Suspect Knees) Trial Team. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for patients presenting in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58 (556) e10-e16
• 35 Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Bungay H. et al. The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for investigation of the knee joint. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5 (27) 1-95
• 36 Damen J, Schiphof D, Wolde ST, Cats HA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Oei EH. Inter-observer reliability for radiographic assessment of early osteoarthritis features: the CHECK (cohort hip and cohort knee) study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (07) 969-974