CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2021; 09(05): 193-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732399
Case Report

Giant Distal Anastomotic Pseudoaneurysm 35 Years after Bentall Operation Mimicking an “Elephant Trunk”

Raffaele Scaffa
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
,
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
,
Antonio Longobardi
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
,
David Ferrara
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
,
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
,
Francesco Itri
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
,
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

We present the case of a giant distal aortic pseudoaneurysm 35 years after a classic mechanical Bentall operation. Computed tomography and coronary angiography showed that this originated from the distal suture line. The proximal suture and coronary ostia appeared to be intact. At reoperation, we found a complete dehiscence of distal suture line: the graft was floating in the pseudoaneurysm, mimicking an “elephant trunk” procedure. This complication suggested a systematic and accurate follow-up of patients who underwent an original Bentall procedure.



Publication History

Received: 28 September 2020

Accepted: 21 March 2021

Article published online:
08 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax 1968; 23 (04) 338-339
  • 2 Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Perrillo JB. Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement. Results of 172 operations. Ann Surg 1991; 214 (03) 308-318 , discussion 318–320
  • 3 Mookhoek A, Korteland NM, Arabkhani B. et al. Bentall procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101 (05) 1684-1689
  • 4 Milano AD, Pratali S, Mecozzi G. et al. Fate of coronary ostial anastomoses after the modified Bentall procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75 (06) 1797-1801 , discussion 1802
  • 5 Sperandio M, Nicolò F, Fusco A, Bovio E, Raguso M, Simonetti G. Upward displacement of prosthetic aortic valved conduit after modified Bentall procedure for type A acute aortic dissection. J Adv Med Med Res 2014; 5 (01) 129-133
  • 6 Zivlas CA. A lethal complication 19 years after Bentall reoperation: was there any other alternative option using cutting-edge technology?. J Cardiol Curr Res 2015; 4 (03) 00144
  • 7 Kouchoukos NT, Marshall Jr. WG, Wedige-Stecher TA. Eleven-year experience with composite graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92 (04) 691-705
  • 8 Weltert L, De Paulis R, Scaffa R, Maselli D, Bellisario A, D'Alessandro S. Re-creation of a sinuslike graft expansion in Bentall procedure reduces stress at the coronary button anastomoses: a finite element study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137 (05) 1082-1087