Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38(02): 106-114
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731761
Original Article

No Microscope? No Problem: A Systematic Review of Microscope-Free Microsurgery Training Models

Jonlin Chen 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Helen Xun
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Mya Abousy
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Chao Long
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Justin M. Sacks
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Benchtop microsurgical training models that use digital tools (smartphones, tablets, and virtual reality [VR]) for magnification are allowing trainees to practice without operating microscopes. This systematic review identifies existing microscope-free training models, compares models in their ability to enhance microsurgical skills, and presents a step-by-step protocol for surgeons seeking to assemble their own microsurgery training model.

Methods We queried PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through November 2020 for microsurgery training models and performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We collected data including training model characteristics (cost, magnification, and components) and outcomes (trainee satisfaction, image resolution, and faster suturing speed). We also conducted a complimentary Google search to identify commercially available microscope-free microsurgical training models or kits not reported in peer-reviewed literature.

Results Literature search identified 1,805 publications; 24 of these met inclusion criteria. Magnification tools most commonly included smartphones (n = 10), VR simulators (n = 4), and tablets (n = 3), with magnification ranging up to ×250 magnification on digital microscopy, ×50 on smartphones, and ×5 on tablets. Average cost of training models ranged from $13 (magnification lens) to $15,000 (augmented reality model). Model were formally assessed using workshops with trainees or attendings (n = 10), surveys to end-users (n = 5), and single-user training (n = 4); users-reported satisfaction with training models and demonstrated faster suturing speed and increased suturing quality with model training. Five commercially available microsurgery training models were identified through Google search.

Conclusion Benchtop microsurgery trainers using digital magnification successfully provide trainees with increased ease of microsurgery training. Low-cost yet high magnification setups using digital microscopes and smartphones are optimal for trainees to improve microsurgical skills. Our assembly protocol, “1, 2, 3, Microsurgery,” provides instructions for training model set up to fit the unique needs of any microsurgery trainee.

Keywords

microsurgery - digital - education - resident training - microscope

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 25 January 2021

Accepted: 12 May 2021

Article published online:
23 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kania K, Chang DK, Abu-Ghname A. et al. Microsurgery training in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (07) e2898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mueller MA, Pourtaheri N, Evans GRD. Microsurgery training resource variation among US integrated plastic surgery residency programs. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (03) 176-181
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Moulton CAE, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244 (03) 400-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sayadi LR, Fligor JE, Couchois S. et al. A novel application of digital microscope for microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2020; 5: 32-35
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pichierri A, Frati A, Santoro A. et al. How to set up a microsurgical laboratory on small animal models: organization, techniques, and impact on residency training. Neurosurg Rev 2009; 32 (01) 101-110 , discussion 110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dumestre D, Yeung JK, Temple-Oberle C. Evidence-based microsurgical skill-acquisition series part 1: validated microsurgical models--a systematic review. J Surg Educ 2014; 71 (03) 329-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Higgins GC, Thomson SE, Baker J. et al. COVID-19 lockdown and beyond: Home practice solutions for developing microsurgical skills. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (02) 407-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lee E, Xun H, Pinni S. et al; Association of Women Surgeons. Nineteen perspectives on COVID-19: How the pandemic impacted women in training for plastic and reconstructive surgery. Accessed June 1, 2021 at: https://blog.womensurgeons.org/training/19-perspectives-on-covid-19/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Berlin G, Bueno D, Gibler K, Schulz J. COVID-19 has caused the deferral of millions of elective procedures, resulting in a potential backlog of case volume. Accessed June 1, 2021 at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/cutting-through-the-covid-19-surgical-backlog#:~:text=The%20onset%20of%20COVID%2D19,large%20backlog%20of%20case%20volume
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sarac BA, Schoenbrunner AR, Wilson SC, Chiu ES, Janis JE. The impact of COVID-19-based suspension of surgeries on plastic surgery practices: a survey of ACAPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (08) e3119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pasricha ND, Haq Z, Ahmad TR. et al. Remote corneal suturing wet lab: microsurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46 (12) 1667-1673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chi D, Chen AD, Dorante MI, Lee BT, Sacks JM. Plastic surgery in the time of COVID-19. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 124-131
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Inchauste SM, Deptula PL, Zelones JT, Nazerali RS, Nguyen DH, Lee GK. Global health microsurgery training with cell phones. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (5S): (Suppl. 04) S273-S277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gallardo FC, Martin C, Aylen ATG, Bustamante J, Nuñez M, Feldman SE. Home program for acquisition and maintenance of microsurgical skills during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak Federico. Block Caving A Viable Altern 2020; 143: 557-563e1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ghabi A, Amar S, Harion M, Legagneux J, Vignes JL, Mathieu L. Microvascular anastomosis using loupes and smartphone magnification: experimental study for application to limited-resource environments. Hand Surg Rehabil 2020; 39 (02) 92-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Leśniewski K, Czernikiewicz K, Żyluk A. An assessment of usefulness of smartphone as a magnifying device for microsurgery training. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2019; 21 (06) 457-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bedi MS, Bhavthankar TD, Girijala MR. et al. Lazy glass microsurgical trainer: a frugal solution for microsurgical training. World Neurosurg 2019; 125: 433-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Teixeira RKC, Feijó DH, Valente AL, de Carvalho LTF, Brito MVH, de Barros RSM. Can smartphones be used to perform video-assisted microanastomosis? An experimental study. Surg Innov 2019; 26 (03) 371-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Capkin S, Cavit A, Kaleli T. Microsurgery training with smartphone. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2018; 50 (06) 443-445
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Karakawa R, Yoshimatsu H, Nakatsukasa S, Iida T. A new method for microsurgery training using a smartphone and a laptop computer. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (01) 124-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Huotarinen A, Niemelä M, Jahromi BR. Easy, efficient, and mobile way to train microsurgical skills during busy life of neurosurgical residency in resource-challenged environment. World Neurosurg 2017; 107: 358-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kim DM, Kang JW, Kim JK, Youn I, Park JW. Microsurgery training using a smartphone. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (06) 500-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hüsken N, Schuppe O, Sismanidis E, Beier F. MicroSim - a microsurgical training simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 184: 205-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kazemi H, Rappel JK, Poston T, Hai Lim B, Burdet E, Leong Teo C. Assessing suturing techniques using a virtual reality surgical simulator. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (06) 479-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wang F, Su E, Burdet E, Bleuler H. Development of a microsurgery training system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008: 1935-1938
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Montgomery KN, Stephanides M, Brown J. et al. A virtual environment for training in microsurgery. Stereosc Displays Virtual Real Syst VI 1999; 1999 (3639): 398-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Margulies IG, Xu H, Henderson PW. Microsurgery training in the digital era: a systematic review of accessible digital resources. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (04) 337-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (09) 712-716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hannes K, Lockwood C. Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67 (07) 1632-1642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Malik MM, Hachach-Haram N, Tahir M, Al-Musabi M, Masud D, Mohanna PN. Acquisition of basic microsurgery skills using home-based simulation training: a randomised control study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (04) 478-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Montgomery K, Stephanides M, Brown J. et al. A virtual environment for training in microsurgery. In: Merritt, JO and Bolas, MT and Fisher, SS. ed. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems VI. Vol. 3639. Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE); 1999: 398-403
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Karakawa R, Yoshimatsu H, Yano T, Sawaizumi M. Microsurgery training using Apple iPad Pro. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (08) 926-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Amin K, Teoh V, Jemec B. Microsurgical i-Trainer: a low cost method to replicate a microscope. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95 (01) 79-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chai A, Crank S, Mizen K, Philip J. Low-cost model using a digital microscope for learning, practicing, and maintaining microvascular surgical skills. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59 (02) 247-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Collan J, Kinnunen R, Rezai Jahromi B, Hernesniemi J. Virtual reality glasses and “eye-hands blind technique” for microsurgical training in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2018; 112: 126-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Huang TCT, Sabbagh MD, Adabi K. et al. Compact and economical microsurgical training made possible with virtual reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (06) 993e-995e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Curran T-A, Eves S, Williams GJ, Troisi L, Nicolaou M. A simple, inexpensive and non-microscope based model for microsurgical training. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (09) 1576-1606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Montgomery K, Thonier G, Stephanides M, Schendel S. Virtual reality based surgical assistance and training system for long duration space missions. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 81: 315-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Blidisel A, Jiga L, Nistor A, Dornean V, Hoinoiu B, Ionac M. Video-assisted versus conventional microsurgical training: a comparative study in the rat model. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (05) 446-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 MicroTrainer. Microsurgery training simulation with the MicroTrainer. Accessed September 11, 2020 at: http://www.microsurgerytrainer.com/product.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 eoSurgical. eoMicro. Accessed June 1, 2021 at: https://pdf.medicalexpo.com/pdf/eosurgical/eomicro/112314-234296.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Pocket Suture L. Pocket microsurgery trainer. Accessed September 11, 2020 at: https://www.pocketsuture.com/trainer
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 The Chamberlain Group. Pocket vessel anastomosis trainer (#1389). Accessed September 11, 2020 at: https://www.thecgroup.com/product/pocket-vessel-anastomosis-trainer-1389/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Surgery E. EASYSURGERY Microsurgery & suture training device. Accessed September 11, 2020 at: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/easysurgery-microsurgery-suture-training-device#/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Gallardo FC, Martin C, Targa Garcia AA, Bustamante JL, Nuñez M, Feldman SE. Home program for acquisition and maintenance of microsurgical skills during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. World Neurosurg 2020; 143: 557-563.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Taylor NW, Webb K, Neumeister MW, Bueno Jr RA. Assessment of resident microsurgical skill using an online video system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (01) 78e-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Tang ETH, Goh M, Goh R. et al. International microsurgery club: an effective online collaboration system. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (06) 412-419
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar