Multiple Grafting with Single Left Internal Mammary Artery as T-Graft with Itself

Abstract

Background Revascularization strategies might be limited in patients with lack of sufficient bypass graft material and increased risk of wound healing disturbances. In this regard, we present first results of patients treated with left internal mammary artery (LIMA) as T-graft with itself due to left-sided double-vessel disease, elevated risk of wound healing infection, and lack of graft material.

Methods Eighteen patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All patients received LIMA grafting, and additional T-graft with itself during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. The investigation was focused on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Results LIMA-LIMA T-graft was performed in a total of 18 patients. Mean Fowler score accounted for 18.2 ± 2.9. Severe vein varicosis was present in 9 patients, and 38.9% of patients had lacking venous graft material due to prior vein stripping. A total of 2.5 ± 0.5 distal anastomoses were performed. Mean flow of LIMA—left anterior descending anastomosis was 41.72 ± 12.11 mL/min with a mean pulsatility index (PI) of 1.01 ± 0.21. Mean flow of subsequent T-graft accounted for 26.31 ± 4.22 mL/min with a mean PI of 1.59 ± 0.47. Median hospital stay was 7(6.75;8) days. No incidence of postoperative wound healing disorders was observed and all patients were discharged off hospital.

Conclusions LIMA as T-graft with itself to treat left-sided double-vessel disease is feasible and safe in patients with missing bypass graft material and increased risk of deep sternal wound infection. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our results.

Keywords

off-pump - coronary artery bypass surgery - LIMA

Note

Authorships:

First authorship was shared due to the equal work of both authors to the manuscript. Dr. Eghbalzadeh shares the senior authorship with Professor Wahlers in regard of their equal supervision of the work presented. Moreover, we listed 9 authors due to the performed significant contributions to the manuscript of all mentioned authors.

^* Authors contributed equally.

^# Authors share the senior authorship.

Publication History

Received: 01 March 2021

Accepted: 31 May 2021

Article published online:
14 September 2021

• References

• 1 Yanagawa B, Verma S, Mazine A. et al. Impact of total arterial revascularization on long term survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 130,305 patients. Int J Cardiol 2017; 233: 29-36
• 2 Sears ED, Wu L, Waljee JF, Momoh AO, Zhong L, Chung KC. The impact of deep sternal wound infection on mortality and resource utilization: a population-based study. World J Surg 2016; 40 (11) 2673-2680
• 3 Blüher M, Brandt D, Lankiewicz J, Mallow PJ, Saunders R. Economic analysis of the European healthcare burden of sternal-wound infections following coronary artery bypass graft. Front Public Health 2020; 8: 557555
• 4 Vos RJ, Van Putte BP, Kloppenburg GTL. Prevention of deep sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery: a literature review. J Hosp Infect 2018; 100 (04) 411-420
• 5 Biancari F, Gatti G, Rosato S. et al. Preoperative risk stratification of deep sternal wound infection after coronary surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020; 41 (04) 444-451
• 6 Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Bugetti M. et al. Deep sternal infections after in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting for left ventricular myocardial revascularization: predictors and influence on 20-year outcomes. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10 (09) 5208-5221
• 7 Ali U, Bibo L, Pierre M. et al. Deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery: a new Australian tertiary centre experience. Heart Lung Circ 2020; 29 (10) 1571-1578
• 8 Borger MA, Rao V, Weisel RD. et al. Deep sternal wound infection: risk factors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65 (04) 1050-1056
• 9 Zenati MA, Bhatt DL, Bakaeen FG. et al; REGROUP Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of endoscopic or open vein-graft harvesting for coronary-artery bypass. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (02) 132-141
• 10 Fouquet O, Tariel F, Desulauze P, Mével G. Does a skeletonized internal thoracic artery give fewer postoperative complications than a pedicled artery for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015; 20 (05) 663-668
• 11 Fowler Jr VG, O'Brien SM, Muhlbaier LH, Corey GR, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Clinical predictors of major infections after cardiac surgery. Circulation 2005; 112 (09) I358-I365
• 12 Ji Q, Xia L, Shi Y. et al. Sequential grafting of in situ skeletonized left internal mammary artery to the left coronary system. Int Heart J 2018; 59 (04) 727-735
• 13 Akyea RKL-BJ, Leonardi-Bee J, Asselbergs FW. et al. Predicting major adverse cardiovascular events for secondary prevention: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk prediction models. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (07) e034564
• 14 Van den Eynde J, Heeren A, Szecel D. et al. Skeletonisation contributing to a reduction of sternal wound complications: a retrospective study in OPCAB patients. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 14 (01) 162
• 15 Hirji S, Shah R, Shah S. et al. Wound complications and 30-day readmissions after single and bilateral internal mammary grafting: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database. J Card Surg 2021; 36 (01) 74-81
• 16 Ji Q, Zhao Y, Liu H. et al. Impacts of skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting on the risk of deep sternal wound infection. Int Heart J 2020; 61 (02) 201-208
• 17 Sareh S, Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y. et al. Predictors and in-hospital outcomes among patients using a single versus bilateral mammary arteries in coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2020; 134: 41-47
• 18 Chan PG, Sultan I, Gleason TG. et al. Contemporary outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in obese patients. J Card Surg 2020; 35 (03) 549-556
• 19 Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S. et al; Arterial Revascularization Trial Investigators. Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts at 10 years. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (05) 437-446
• 20 Samadashvili Z, Sundt III TM, Wechsler A. et al. Multiple versus single arterial coronary bypass graft surgery for multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74 (10) 1275-1285