Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2021; 09(02): 083-085
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730008
Case Report

Perceval Implantation and Ascending Replacement: Which Should Be Performed First?

Authors

  • Giuseppe Santarpino

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, Gruppo Villa Maria Care & Research, Bari, Italy
    2   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
    3   Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
  • Luigi Specchia

    4   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Città di Lecce Hospital, Gruppo Villa Maria Care & Research, Lecce, Italy
  • Pasquale Mastroroberto

    3   Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
  • Renato Gregorini

    4   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Città di Lecce Hospital, Gruppo Villa Maria Care & Research, Lecce, Italy

Funding None.

Abstract

The use of sutureless prostheses has expanded due to their ability to reduce surgical times, thus favoring their implantation in high-risk patients. It is not uncommon that these patients have an ascending aortic aneurysm requiring treatment with a vascular prosthesis; therefore, using a sutureless aortic valve may be associated. To date, however, little is known about the time sequence of this intervention, that is, if sutureless implantation should precede or follow that of the vascular prosthesis.



Publication History

Received: 31 March 2020

Accepted: 25 February 2021

Article published online:
07 October 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA