CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2021; 30(01): 126-133
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726484
Section 3: Clinical Information Systems
Working Group Contribution

Telehealth and the COVID-19 Pandemic: International Perspectives and a Health Systems Framework for Telehealth Implementation to Support Critical Response

Arindam Basu
1   University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
,
Craig Kuziemsky
2   MacEwan University, Edmonton, Canada
,
Magdala de Araújo Novaes
3   Medical Sciences Center, Telehealth Center, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
,
Araujo Kleber
4   Telehealth Center (NUTES), Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
,
Fernando Sales
5   Technology and Geosciences Center, Telehealth Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
,
Najeeb Al-Shorbaji
6   eHealth Development Association of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
,
José F. Flórez-Arango
7   Texas A & M University, College Station, United States of America
,
Shashi B. Gogia
8   Society for Administration of Telemedicine and Healthcare Informatics, New Delhi, India
,
Kendall Ho
9   University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
,
Inga Hunter
10   Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
,
Sriram Iyengar
11   University of Arizona, Phoenix, United States of America
,
Oommen John
12   George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
,
Sheila John
13   Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India
,
Gumindu Kulatunga
14   Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
15   University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
,
Vije Kumar Rajput
16   Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
,
Prasad Ranatunga
14   Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
15   University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
,
Jai Ganesh Udayasankaran
17   Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust, Puttaparthi, India
› Author Affiliations

Summary

Objectives: Telehealth implementation is a complex systems-based endeavour. This paper compares telehealth responses to (COrona VIrus Disease 2019) COVID-19 across ten countries to identify lessons learned about the complexity of telehealth during critical response such as in response to a global pandemic. Our overall objective is to develop a health systems-based framework for telehealth implementation to support critical response.

Methods: We sought responses from the members of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Telehealth Working Group (WG) on their practices and perception of telehealth practices during the times of COVID-19 pandemic in their respective countries. We then analysed their responses to identify six emerging themes that we mapped to the World Health Organization (WHO) model of health systems.

Results: Our analysis identified six emergent themes. (1) Government, legal or regulatory aspects of telehealth; (2) Increase in telehealth capacity and delivery; (3) Regulated and unregulated telehealth; (4) Changes in the uptake and perception of telemedicine; (5) Public engagement in telehealth responses to COVID-19; and (6) Implications for training and education. We discuss these themes and then use them to develop a systems framework for telehealth support in critical response.

Conclusion: COVID-19 has introduced new challenges for telehealth support in times of critical response. Our themes and systems framework extend the WHO systems model and highlight that telemedicine usage in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is complex and multidimensional. Our systems-based framework provides guidance for telehealth implementation as part of health systems response to a global pandemic such as COVID-19.



Publication History

Article published online:
21 April 2021

© 2021. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A. The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health 2020; 20: 1193
  • 2 Fagherazzi G, Goetzinger C, Rashid MA, Aguayo GA, Huiart L. Digital health strategies to fight COVID-19 worldwide: challenges, recommendations, and a call for papers. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (06) e19284
  • 3 Whitelaw S, Mamas MA, Topol E, VanSpall HGC. Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. Lancet Digi Health 2020; 2 (08) e435-e440
  • 4 Mort M, Finch T. Principles for telemedicine and telecare: The perspective of a citizens’ panel. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11: 66-8
  • 5 Reeves JJ, Hollandsworth HM, Torriani FJ, Taplitz R, Abeles S, Tai-Seale M. et al. Rapid response to COVID-19: health informatics support for outbreak management in an academic health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (06) 853-9
  • 6 Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (Suppl 1): S21-7
  • 7 Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad ZF, Cho A, Phinney D. et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (06) 957-62
  • 8 Thomas EE, Haydon HM, Mehrotra A, Caffery LJ, Snoswell CL, Banbury A. et al. Building on the momentum: Sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 1357633X20960638
  • 9 Kuziemsky CE, Gogia SB, Househ M, Petersen C, Basu A. Balancing Health Information Exchange and Privacy Governance from a Patient-Centred Connected Health and Telehealth Perspective: A Contribution from the IMIA Organizational and Social Issues and Telehealth Working Groups. Yearb Med. Inform 2018; 27: 48-54
  • 10 Kaplan B. Revisting Health Information Technology Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues and Evaluation: Telehealth/Telemedicine and COVID-19. Int J Med Inform 2020; 143: 104239
  • 11 Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW, Bellwood P, Brender J. Technology-induced errors. Methods Inf Med 2012; 51 (02) 95-103
  • 12 Gogia SB, Maeder A, Mars M, Hartvigsen G, Basu A, Abbott P. Unintended consequences of tele health and their possible solutions: contribution of the IMIA working group on telehealth. Yearb Med Inform 2016; (01) 41-6
  • 13 Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care’an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 542-9
  • 14 Kuziemsky CE, Randell R, Borycki EM. Understanding Unintended Consequences and Health Information Technology: Contribution from the IMIA Organizational and Social Issues Working Group. Yearb Med Inform 2016; (01) 53-60
  • 15 Mosnaim GS, Stempel H, VanSickle D, Stempel DA. The Adoption and Implementation of Digital Health Care in the Post–COVID-19 Era. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020; 8 (08) 2484-6
  • 16 Legido-Quigley H, Asgari N, Teo YY, Leung GM, Oshitani H, Fukuda K, Cook AR. et al. Are high-performing health systems resilient against the COVID-19 epidemic?. Lancet 2020; 395 (10227): 848-50
  • 17 DeSavigny D, Adam T. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. World Health Organization 2009
  • 18 WHO. Health Systems Governance. Health systems governance [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/health-systems-governance
  • 19 Adam T, deSavigny D. Systems thinking for strengthening health systems in LMICs: need for a paradigm shift. Health policy and planning 2012; 27 (Suppl 4): iv1-3
  • 20 Chang AY, Ogbuoji O, Atun R, Verguet S. Dynamic modeling approaches to characterize the functioning of health systems: A systematic review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 2017; 194: 160-7
  • 21 Champion C, Kuziemsky C, Affleck E, Alvarez GG. A systems approach for modeling health information complexity. Int J Inf Manage 2019; 49: 343-54
  • 22 Smith AC, Thomas E, Snoswell CL, Haydon H, Mehrotra A, Clemensen J. et al. Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare 2020; 26: 309-13
  • 23 Basu A. Data for Managing COVID-19 [Internet] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Available from: https://github.com/arinbasu/2020-12-07-imia_paper
  • 24 Sacks E, Morrow M, Story WT, Shelley KD, Shanklink D, Rahimtoola M. et al. Beyond the building blocks: integrating community roles into health systems frameworks to achieve health for all. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 3 (Suppl3): e001384
  • 25 Kuziemsky CE, Hunter I, Gogia SB. Ethics in Telehealth: Comparison between Guidelines and Practice-based Experience-the Case for Learning Health Systems. Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29 (01) 44-50
  • 26 Kulatunga GG, Hewapathirana R, Marasinghe R, Dissanayake VHW. A review of Telehealth practices in Sri Lanka in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sri Lanka Journal of Bio-Medical Informatics 2020; 11 (01) 8-19
  • 27 Today C. App introduced to consult doctors. CeylonToday [Internet] 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 17]. Available from: https://ceylontoday.lk/news/app-introduced-to-consult-doctors
  • 28 SinghBhandari S, Joseph SJ, Udayasankaran JG, Konthoujam B, Shoib S, Dutta S. Telepsychiatry: a feasible means to bridge the demand–supply gaps in mental health services during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: preliminary experiences from Sikkim state of India. Indian J Psychol Med 2020; 42: 500-2
  • 29 Haranath SP, Udayasankaran JG. Tele-intensive care unit networks: A viable means for augmenting critical care capacity in India for the COVID pandemic and beyond. Apollo Medicine 2020; 17: 209