CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2021; 09(03): 100-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726279
Original Research Article

Modified Technique for Retrograde Cerebral Perfusion during Hemiarch Aortic Replacement

1   Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Marc Haynes
1   Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Sarah Hester
1   Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Catherine F. Castner
1   Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported in part by a grant from the Missouri Baptist Healthcare Foundation.

Abstract

Background Uncertainty remains regarding the optimal method of brain protection for procedures that require repair or replacement of the aortic arch. We examined the early outcomes of a technique for brain protection in patients undergoing partial aortic arch (hemiarch) replacement that involves deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) of cold blood from the superior vena cava toward the end of the arrest interval.

Methods During a recent 15-year interval, 520 patients underwent elective or urgent/emergent ascending aortic and hemiarch replacement as an isolated (47 patients) or combined (473 patients) procedure employing DHCA (mean nasopharyngeal temperature at circulatory arrest, 17.1°C and mean duration, 19.3 minutes) supplemented with RCP of cold blood from the superior vena cava toward the end of the arrest interval (mean, 6.7 minutes). The mean age of the patients was 59.5 years, and 65% were male.

Results The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 1.2% (six patients). Seven patients (1.4%) sustained a stroke and 19 patients (3.7%) had transient neurologic dysfunction that completely resolved by the time of hospital discharge. Four patients (0.77%) developed postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis. Twenty-one patients (4%) required ventilator support for >48 hours and five patients (0.96%) required a tracheostomy. The median hospital length of stay was 6 days.

Conclusion DHCA with a brief interval of RCP is a safe and effective technique for brain protection during hemiarch aortic replacement. RCP reduces the duration of brain ischemia and permits removal of particulate matter and air from the arterial circulation.



Publication History

Received: 17 July 2020

Accepted: 15 November 2020

Article published online:
12 October 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Ziganshin BA. Which method of cerebral protection do you prefer to use for aortic arch surgery?. Aorta (Stamford) 2013; 1 (01) 69-70
  • 2 De Paulis R, Czerny M, Weltert L. et al; EACTS Vascular Domain Group. Current trends in cannulation and neuroprotection during surgery of the aortic arch in Europe. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47 (05) 917-923
  • 3 Kouchoukos NT. Adjuncts to reduce the incidence of embolic brain injury during operations on the aortic arch. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57 (01) 243-245
  • 4 Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Cozzens K. et al. Out-of-hospital 30-day deaths following cardiac surgery are often under-reported. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110 (01) 183-188
  • 5 Kaneko T, Aranki SF, Neely RC. et al. Is there a need for adjunct cerebral protection in conjunction with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during noncomplex hemiarch surgery?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (06) 2911-2917
  • 6 Svensson LG, Nadolny EM, Penney DL. et al. Prospective randomized neurocognitive and S-100 study of hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde brain perfusion, and antegrade brain perfusion for aortic arch operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71 (06) 1905-1912
  • 7 Matalanis G, Hata M, Buxton BF. A retrospective comparative study of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde, and antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic arch surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 9 (03) 174-179
  • 8 Apaydin AZ, Islamoglu F, Askar FZ. et al. Immediate clinical outcome after prolonged periods of brain protection: retrospective comparison of hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde, and antegrade perfusion. J Card Surg 2009; 24 (05) 486-489
  • 9 Misfeld M, Leontyev S, Borger MA. et al. What is the best strategy for brain protection in patients undergoing aortic arch surgery? A single center experience of 636 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93 (05) 1502-1508
  • 10 Ziganshin BA, Rajbanshi BG, Tranquilli M, Fang H, Rizzo JA, Elefteriades JA. Straight deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for cerebral protection during aortic arch surgery: safe and effective. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (03) 888-898 , discussion 898–900
  • 11 Elefteriades JA, Ziganshin BA. Brain protection in aortic arch surgery: antegrade cerebral perfusion and retrograde cerebral perfusion need a tougher row to hoe. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (06) 2902-2904
  • 12 Schmoker J. Belt and suspenders: can we keep them in the drawer?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (06) 2917-2919
  • 13 Milewski RK, Pacini D, Moser GW. et al. Retrograde and antegrade cerebral perfusion: results in short elective arch reconstructive times. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (05) 1448-1457
  • 14 Ganapathi AM, Hanna JM, Schechter MA. et al. Antegrade versus retrograde cerebral perfusion for hemiarch replacement with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: does it matter? A propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (06) 2896-2902
  • 15 Girardi LN, Shavladze N, Sedrakyan A, Neragi-Miandoab S. Safety and efficacy of retrograde cerebral perfusion as an adjunct for cerebral protection during surgery on the aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (06) 2927-2933
  • 16 Vallabhajosyula P, Jassar AS, Menon RS. et al. Moderate versus deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for elective aortic transverse hemiarch reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99 (05) 1511-1517
  • 17 Leshnower BG, Rangaraju S, Allen JW, Stringer AY, Gleason TG, Chen EP. Deep hypothermia with retrograde cerebral perfusion versus moderate hypothermia with antegrade cerebral perfusion for arch surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107 (04) 1104-1110
  • 18 Kamiya H, Hagl C, Kropivnitskaya I. et al. The safety of moderate hypothermic lower body circulatory arrest with selective cerebral perfusion: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133 (02) 501-509
  • 19 Tsai JY, Pan W, Lemaire SA. et al. Moderate hypothermia during aortic arch surgery is associated with reduced risk of early mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146 (03) 662-667
  • 20 Keenan JE, Wang H, Gulack BC. et al. Does moderate hypothermia really carry less bleeding risk than deep hypothermia for circulatory arrest? A propensity-matched comparison in hemiarch replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (06) 1559-1569.e2
  • 21 Williams JB, Phillips-Bute B, Bhattacharya SD. et al. Predictors of massive transfusion with thoracic aortic procedures involving deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141 (05) 1283-1288
  • 22 Stein LH, Rubinfeld G, Balsam LB, Ursomanno P, DeAnda Jr A. Too cold to clot? Does intraoperative hypothermia contribute to bleeding after aortic surgery?. Aorta (Stamford) 2017; 5 (04) 106-116