Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(07): 566-579
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723816
Original Article

The Impact of Prior Abdominal Surgery on Complications of Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evalina S. Bond
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
,
Carol E. Soteropulos 
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
,
Qiuyu Yang
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
,
Samuel O. Poore    ∗
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Approximately half of all patients presenting for autologous breast reconstruction have abdominal scars from prior surgery, the presence of which is considered by some a relative contraindication for abdominally based reconstruction. This meta-analysis examines the impact of prior abdominal surgery on the complication profile of breast reconstruction with abdominally based free tissue transfer.

Methods Literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Included studies examined patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery who then underwent abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Prior liposuction patients and those with atypical flap designs were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Flap complications included total and partial flap loss, fat necrosis, infection, and reoperation. Donor-site complications included delayed wound healing, infection, seroma, hematoma, and abdominal wall morbidity (hernia, bulge, laxity). Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between groups were calculated. Forest plots, I 2 statistic heterogeneity assessments, and publication bias funnel plots were produced. Publication bias was corrected with a trim-and-fill protocol. Overall effects were assessed by fixed-effects and random-effects models.

Results After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 16 articles were included for final review. These included 14 cohort and 2 case–control studies, with 1,656 (46.3%) patients and 2,236 (48.5%) flaps having undergone prior surgery. Meta-analysis showed patients with prior abdominal surgery were significantly more likely to experience donor-site delayed wound healing with a risk ratio of 1.27 (random 95% CI [1.00; 1.61]; I 2= 4) after adjustment for publication bias. No other complications were statistically different between groups.

Conclusion In patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, abdominally based free tissue transfer is a safe and reliable option. Abdominal scars may slightly increase the risk of delayed donor-site wound healing, which can aid the surgeon in preoperative counseling.

Keywords

autologous breast reconstruction - DIEP flap - abdominal scar - prior abdominal surgery - cesarean section

Authors' Contributions

E.S.B. and C.E.S. conceptualized, designed, and drafted the manuscript. E.S.B. collected and analyzed the data. C.E.S. and S.O.P. revised the manuscript and analyzed the data. Q.Y. analyzed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript.


∗ Twitter handle: @drsamuelpoore


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 July 2020

Accepted: 15 December 2020

Article published online:
01 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Nelson JA, Lee IT, Disa JJ. The functional impact of breast reconstruction: an overview and update. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (03) e1640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Tabatabaeifar S, Damsgaard T, Sørensen JA. Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (02) 278-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Eltahir Y, Krabbe-Timmerman IS, Sadok N, Werker PMN, de Bock GH. Outcome of quality of life for women undergoing autologous versus alloplastic breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (05) 1109-1123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Di Candia M, Asfoor AA, Jessop ZM, Kumiponjera D, Hsieh F, Malata CM. Previous multiple abdominal surgeries: a valid contraindication to abdominal free flap breast reconstruction?. Eplasty 2012; 12: e31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berrino P, Casabona F, Adami M, Muggianu M. The “parasite” TRAM flap for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction in patients with vertical midabdominal scars. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 43 (02) 119-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Heller L, Feledy JA, Chang DW. Strategies and options for free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients with midline abdominal scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (03) 753-759 , discussion 760–761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Arnez ZM, Bajec J, Bardsley AF, Scamp T, Webster MH. Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (03) 470-478 , discussion 479–482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dragu A, Unglaub F, Wolf MB. et al. Scars and perforator-based flaps in the abdominal region: a contraindication?. Can J Surg 2010; 53 (02) 137-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Losken A, Carlson GW, Jones GE, Culbertson JH, Schoemann M, Bostwick III J. Importance of right subcostal incisions in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49 (02) 115-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ribuffo D, Marcellino M, Barnett GR, Houseman ND, Scuderi N. Breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps after abdominoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (06) 1604-1608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Avashia YJ, Desrosiers III AE, Flores JI. A second superior gluteal artery perforator flap with previous liposuction to the same breast after resection of initial SGAP breast reconstruction due to cancer recurrence. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (06) 482-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 De Frene B, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M. et al. Free DIEAP and SGAP flap breast reconstruction after abdominal/gluteal liposuction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (10) 1031-1036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Farid M, Nicholson S, Kotwal A, Akali A. DIEP breast reconstruction following multiple abdominal liposuction procedures. Eplasty 2014; 14: e47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jandali S, Nelson JA, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction in patients with prior abdominal contouring procedures. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (09) 607-614
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wes AM, Cleveland E, Nelson JA. et al. Do prior abdominal surgeries increase complications in abdominally based breast reconstructions?. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (05) 526-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hsieh F, Kumiponjera D, Malata CM. An algorithmic approach to abdominal flap breast reconstruction in patients with pre-existing scars--results from a single surgeon's experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (12) 1650-1660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hsieh F, Somia N, Lam TC. A new approach to preexisting vertical midline abdominal scars with crossover DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (02) 151-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chang CC, Huang JJ, Wu CW. et al. A strategic approach for DIEP flap breast reconstruction in patients with a vertical midline abdominal scar. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (Suppl. 01) S6-S11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Takeishi M, Shaw WW, Ahn CY, Borud LJ. TRAM flaps in patients with abdominal scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (03) 713-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Roger J, Hussl H, Huemer GM. Management of infraumbilical vertical scars in DIEP-flaps by crossover anastomosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (05) 524-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dayhim F, Wilkins EG. The impact of Pfannenstiel scars on TRAM flap complications. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (05) 432-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Parrett BM, Caterson SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. DIEP flaps in women with abdominal scars: are complication rates affected?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1527-1531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hamdi M, Khuthaila DK, Van Landuyt K, Roche N, Monstrey S. Double-pedicle abdominal perforator free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction: new horizons in microsurgical tissue transfer to the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (08) 904-912 , discussion 913–914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pennington DG, Nettle WJ, Lam P. Microvascular augmentation of the blood supply of the contralateral side of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31 (02) 123-126 , discussion 126–127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ali RS, Garrido A, Ramakrishnan V. Stacked free hemi-DIEP flaps: a method of autologous breast reconstruction in a patient with midline abdominal scarring. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55 (04) 351-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hernandez Rosa J, Sherif RD, Torina PJ, Harmaty MA. Use of both antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels in the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (01) 47-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 LoTempio MM, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (02) 393-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Laporta R, Longo B, Sorotos M, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Tips and tricks for DIEP flap breast reconstruction in patients with previous abdominal scar. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (04) 282-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB. et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (04) 1153-1160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nykiel M, Hunter C, Lee GK. Algorithmic approach to the design and harvest of abdominal flaps for microvascular breast reconstruction in patients with abdominal scars. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74 (Suppl. 01) S33-S40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Nahabedian MY, Momen B. Lower abdominal bulge after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (02) 124-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Malata CM, Rabey NG. Decision making in double-pedicled DIEP and SIEA abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: an algorithmic approach and comprehensive classification. Front Surg 2015; 2: 49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (05) 1100-1109 , discussion 1110–1111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Daly LT, Doval AF, Lin SJ, Tobias A, Lee BT, Dowlatshahi AS. Role of CTA in women with abdominal scars undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction: review of 1,187 flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 294-300
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Roostaeian J, Yoon AP, Sanchez IS. et al. The effect of prior abdominal surgery on abdominally based free flaps in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 247e-255e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Cleveland EC, Fischer JP, Nelson JA. et al. Optimizing the fascial closure: an analysis of 1261 abdominally based free flap reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (03) 255-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Unukovych D, Gallego CH, Aineskog H, Rodriguez-Lorenzo A, Mani M. Predictors of reoperations in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (08) e1016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25 (09) 603-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56 (02) 455-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Doval AF, Lamelas AM, Daly LT. et al. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction in women with previous abdominal incisions: a comparison of complication rates. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 81 (05) 560-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Henry SL, Chang CC, Misra A, Huang JJ, Cheng MH. Inclusion of tissue beyond a midline scar in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67 (03) 251-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Mahajan AL, Zeltzer A, Claes KEY, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M. Are Pfannenstiel scars a boon or a curse for DIEP flap breast reconstructions?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (04) 797-805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kim SY, Lee KT, Mun GH. The influence of a Pfannenstiel scar on venous anatomy of the lower abdominal wall and implications for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 540-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Elliott LF, Seify H, Bergey P. The 3-hour muscle-sparing free TRAM flap: safe and effective treatment review of 111 consecutive free TRAM flaps in a private practice setting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 27-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ricci JA, Kamali P, Becherer BE. et al. Umbilical necrosis rates after abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Res 2017; 215: 257-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Santanelli F, Longo B, Cagli B, Pugliese P, Sorotos M, Paolini G. Predictive and protective factors for partial necrosis in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: does nulliparity bias flap viability?. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74 (01) 47-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Semple JL. Retrograde microvascular augmentation (turbocharging) of a single-pedicle TRAM flap through a deep inferior epigastric arterial and venous loop. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (01) 109-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Blondeel PN, Boeckx WD. Refinements in free flap breast reconstruction: the free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47 (07) 495-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Beahm EK, Walton RL. The efficacy of bilateral lower abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 41-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Lee JC, Whipple LA, Binetti B, Singh TP, Agag R. Technique and outcomes of laparoscopic bulge repair after abdominal free flap reconstruction. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (05) 367-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar