Subscribe to RSS
Bilaminate Synthetic Dermal Matrix versus Free Fascial Flaps: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Full-Thickness Hand ReconstructionFunding None.
Background Full-thickness injuries to the hand require durable soft tissue coverage to preserve tendon gliding and hand motion. We aim to investigate the cost effectiveness of hand resurfacing comparing free fascial flap reconstruction versus bilaminate synthetic dermal matrices.
Methods Cost effectiveness was modeled using decision tree analysis with the rollback method. Total active range of motion was modeled as the common outcome variable based on systematic literature review. Costing was performed from a payer perspective using national Medicare reimbursements. The willingness to pay threshold was determined by average worker's compensation for hand disability. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted for range of motion outcomes and the costs using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.
Results The average cost of free fascial flap reconstruction was $14,201.24 compared with $13,674.20 for Integra, yielding an incremental cost difference of $527.04. Incremental range of motion improvement was 18.0 degrees with free fascial flaps, yielding an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $29.30/degree of motion. Assuming willingness to pay thresholds of $557.00/degree of motion, free-fascial flaps were highly cost effective. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, free fascial flaps were dominant in 25.5% of simulations and cost effective in 32.1% of simulations. Thus, microsurgical reconstruction was the economically sound technique in 57.5% of scenarios.
Conclusion Free fascial flap reconstruction of complex hand wounds was marginally more expensive than synthetic dermal matrix and yielded incrementally better outcomes. Both dermal matrix and microsurgical techniques were cost effective in the base case and in sensitivity analysis. In choosing between dermal matrix and microsurgical reconstruction of complex hand wounds, neither technique has a clear economic advantage.
Received: 11 August 2020
Accepted: 19 November 2020
24 January 2021 (online)
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
- 1 Krishnamoorthy R, Karthikeyan G. Degloving injuries of the hand. Indian J Plast Surg 2011; 44 (02) 227-236
- 2 Ueda K, Harashina T, Harada T, Oba S, Nagasaka S. Omentum as gliding material after extensive forearm tenolysis. Br J Plast Surg 1993; 46 (07) 590-593
- 3 Weigert R, Choughri H, Casoli V. Management of severe hand wounds with Integra dermal regeneration template. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (03) 185-193
- 4 Reynolds M, Kelly DA, Walker NJ, Crantford C, Defranzo AJ. Use of Integra in the management of complex hand wounds from cancer resection and nonburn trauma. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (01) 74-79
- 5 Herrera FA, Rbs B, Horton KM. Management of hand and digit soft tissue injuries using free fascia and fasciocutaneous flaps with neo-syndactylization. Arch Med 2016; 8: 6
- 6 Flügel A, Kehrer A, Heitmann C, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Coverage of soft-tissue defects of the hand with free fascial flaps. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (01) 47-53
- 7 Burke JF, Yannas IV, Quinby Jr. WC, Bondoc CC, Jung WK. Successful use of a physiologically acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive burn injury. Ann Surg 1981; 194 (04) 413-428
- 8 Rizzo M. The use of Integra in hand and upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (03) 583-586
- 9 Shores JT, Hiersche M, Gabriel A, Gupta S. Tendon coverage using an artificial skin substitute. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (11) 1544-1550
- 10 del Piñal F, Moraleda E, de Piero GH, Ruas JS. Outcomes of free adipofascial flaps combined with tenolysis in scarred beds. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (02) 269-279
- 11 Robinson R. Cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ 1993; 307 (6907): 793-795
- 12 Schiavon M, Francescon M, Drigo D. et al. The use of Integra dermal regeneration template versus flaps for reconstruction of full-thickness scalp defects involving the calvaria: a cost-benefit analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016; 40 (06) 901-907
- 13 Kleinert HE, Verdan C. Report of the committee on tendon injuries (International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand). J Hand Surg Am 1983; 8 (5 pt 2): 794-798
- 14 Tang JB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin 2005; 21 (02) 199-210
- 15 Stranix JT, Lee Z-H, Jacoby A. et al. Forty years of lower extremity take-backs: flap type influences salvage outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 1282-1287
- 16 Blank MM, Chen L, Papageorge M, Driscoll D, Graham R, Chatterjee A. The underreporting of cost perspective in cost-analysis research: a systematic review of the plastic surgery literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (03) 366-376
- 17 Blank MM, Papageorge M, Chen L, Driscoll D, Graham R, Chatterjee A. Hidden bias in cost-analysis research: what is the prevalence of under-reporting cost perspective in the general surgical literature?. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225 (06) 823-828.e12
- 18 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. License for use of current procedural terminology, fourth edition. Accessed November 7, 2019 at: https://www.cms.gov/apps/physician-fee-schedule/search/search-criteria.aspx
- 19 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Inpatient charge data FY 2016. Accessed November 7, 2019 at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data/Inpatient2016.html
- 20 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. DMEPOS fee schedule. Accessed November 7, 2019 at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/DMEPOSFeeSched/DMEPOS-Fee-Schedule.html
- 21 Groeger L, Grabell M. Workers' comp benefits: how much is a limb worth?. Accessed November 7, 2019 at: https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/workers-compensation-benefits-by-limb
- 22 Malehi AS, Pourmotahari F, Angali KA. Statistical models for the analysis of skewed healthcare cost data: a simulation study. Health Econ Rev 2015; 5: 11
- 23 Katsaros J, Tan E, Robinson DN. Cost-effectiveness of free tissue transfer. Aust N Z J Surg 1988; 58 (05) 373-376
- 24 de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Slavin SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (05) 516-520
- 25 Johnson AR, Asban A, Granoff MD. et al. Is immediate lymphatic reconstruction cost-effective?. Ann Surg 2019; DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003746.
- 26 Tran BNN, Fadayomi A, Lin SJ, Singhal D, Lee BT. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps. J Surg Oncol 2017; 116 (04) 439-447
- 27 Wong JYP. Time off work in hand injury patients. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (05) 718-725
- 28 Lies S, Horowitz A, Lee G, Zhang A. Review of the optimal timing and technique for extensor tendon reconstruction in composite dorsal hand wounds. Plast Aesthet Res 2019; 6: 18
- 29 Barillo DJMD, Harvey KDOTR, Hobbs CLRPT, Mozingo DWMD, Cioffi WGMD, Pruitt Jr BAJMD. Prospective outcome analysis of a protocol for the surgical and rehabilitative management of burns to the hands. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (06) 1442-1451
- 30 Hunter JM, Mackin E, Callahan AD. Rehabilitation of the Hand: Surgery and Therapy. Maryland, MO: Mosby; 1995
- 31 Lee MG, Kim JS, Lee DC, Roh SY, Lee KJ, Choi BK. Fascial free flap for reconstruction of the dorsolateral hand and digits: the advantage of a thin contour. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43 (06) 551-558
- 32 Carty MJ, Taghinia A, Upton J. Fascial flap reconstruction of the hand: a single surgeon’s 30-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 953-962