J Knee Surg 2022; 35(12): 1295-1300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722693
Original Article

Initial Experience with the NAVIO Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Replacement—Coronal Alignment Accuracy and the Learning Curve

Kade Collins
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
,
Paul A. Agius
2   Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
3   Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Andrew Fraval
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
,
Josh Petterwood
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
4   Department of Orthopaedics, Calvary Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

One of the primary aim of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is restoration of the mechanical axis of the lower limb. Maintenance of the mechanical axis within 3 degrees of neutral has been shown to result in improved clinical results and implant longevity. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of this robotic-assisted system in coronal plane component positioning in TKA. We also describe the learning curve associated with adoption of this technology. A total of 72 total knee replacements were completed between November 2017 and September 2018 by a single surgeon using the robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system. Cases were recorded from the time the study surgeon first adopted this technology and represent the “learning curve.” Pre- and postoperative coronal weight-bearing alignments were measured and intraoperative robotic-assisted registration data and duration of use were collected. Of the 72 TKAs in this series, 93.3% were corrected to the desired alignment of within 3 degrees of neutral. The knees that were not corrected to neutral had a mean preoperative alignment of 11.57 degrees of deformity as compared with 4.29 degrees for those that were corrected to neutral. A learning curve effect during adoption of this new technology was not found when analyzing RAS usage time. The RAS system produced accurate coronal alignment in TKA in more than 93% of cases with no learning curve effect. Our study suggests that this system is easily adopted, safe, and accurate.



Publication History

Received: 23 April 2020

Accepted: 29 November 2020

Article published online:
28 January 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (05) 709-714
  • 2 Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 127-133
  • 3 Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (04) 560-569
  • 4 Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB. et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 26-34
  • 5 Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (173) 178-183
  • 6 Hvid I, Nielsen S. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55 (02) 160-165
  • 7 Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299) 153-156
  • 8 Lording T, Lustig S, Neyret P. Coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 1 (01) 12-17
  • 9 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
  • 10 Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (08) 1097-1106
  • 11 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464: 111-116
  • 12 Bargar WL. Robots in orthopaedic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 463: 31-36
  • 13 Song E-K, Seon J-K, Yim J-H, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 118-126
  • 14 van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (11) 3482-3495
  • 15 Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Sultan AA, Chughtai M, Molloy RM, Mont MA. Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (07) 2002-2006
  • 16 Lonner JH, Smith JR, Picard F, Hamlin B, Rowe PJ, Riches PE. High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 206-212
  • 17 Picard F, Gregori A, Bellemans J. et al. Handheld robot-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a clinical review. Orthop Proc 2014; 96-B (16) 25-25
  • 18 Simons M, Riches P. The learning curve of robotically-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Orthop Proc 2014; 96-B (11) 152-152
  • 19 Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Bingham RJ, Ek ET, Stoney JD, Choong PFM. The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee 2013; 20 (04) 242-249
  • 20 Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad FS. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4 (10) 611-617
  • 21 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307-310
  • 22 StataCorp. Stata: Release 15. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2018
  • 23 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A. et al. Coronal correction for severe deformity using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 2-5
  • 24 Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS. et al. The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 17-21
  • 25 Song E-K, Seon J-K, Park S-J, Jung WB, Park H-W, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (07) 1069-1076
  • 26 Bae DK, Song SJ. Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3 (04) 259-267
  • 27 Sires JD, Wilson CJ. CT validation of intraoperative implant position and knee alignment as determined by the MAKO total knee arthroplasty system. J Knee Surg 2021; 34 (10) 1133-1137
  • 28 Liow MHL, Chin PL, Pang HN, Tay DK-J, Yeo S-J. THINK surgical TSolution-One® (Robodoc) total knee arthroplasty. SICOT J 2017; 3 (10) 63-66