Discipline-Specific Perspectives on Caring for Babies with Trisomy 13 or 18 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Abstract

Objective Care offerings vary across medical settings and between families for babies with trisomy 13 or 18. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore nurse, advanced practice practitioner, and neonatologist perspectives on care for babies with trisomy 13 or 18 in the intensive care unit.

Study Design Voice-recorded qualitative interviews occurred with 64 participants (41 bedside nurses, 14 advance practice practitioners, and 9 neonatologists) from two neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in the midwestern United States. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines were followed. Content analyses occurred utilizing MAXQDA (VERBI Software, 2020).

Results Over half of NICU staff perceived care for babies with trisomy 13 or 18 as different from care for other babies with critical chronic illness. Qualitative themes included internal conflict, variable presentation and prognosis, grappling with uncertainty, family experiences, and provision of meaningful care. Neonatologists emphasized the variability of presentation and prognosis, while nurses emphasized provision of meaningful care. Phrases “hard/difficult” were spoken 31 times; primarily describing the comorbidities, complexities, and prognostic uncertainty.

Conclusion Care for babies with these genetic diagnoses reveals need for a shared dialogue not only with families but also across staff disciplines. While perspectives differ, participants depicted striving to offer compassionate, family-centered care while also balancing biomedical uncertainty about interventions for children with trisomy 13 and 18.

Key Points

• Care for babies with trisomy 13 or 18 has been recognized as shifting.

• Controversy exists across the diverse and changing range of care models.

• This study describes perspectives of bedside neonatal nurses, advanced practitioners, and neonatologists.

• Differences in perspectives warrant attentiveness to insights and dialogue across disciplines.

Keywords

trisomy 13 - trisomy 18 - communication - interdisciplinary - palliative care

• References

• 1 Lantos JD. Trisomy 13 and 18–treatment decisions in a stable gray zone. JAMA 2016; 316 (04) 396-398
• 2 Koogler TK, Wilfond BS, Ross LF. Lethal language, lethal decisions. Hastings Cent Rep 2003; 33 (02) 37-41
• 3 Carvajal HG, Callahan CP, Miller JR, Rensink BL, Eghtesady P. Cardiac surgery in trisomy 13 and 18: a guide to clinical decision-making. Pediatr Cardiol 2020; 41 (07) 1319-1333
• 4 Neubauer K, Boss RD. Ethical considerations for cardiac surgical interventions in children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2020; 184 (01) 187-191
• 5 Kett JC. Who is the next “baby doe?” From trisomy 21 to trisomy 13 and 18 and beyond. Pediatrics 2020; 146 (Suppl. 01) S9-S12
• 6 Parker MJ, Budd JL, Draper ES, Young ID. Trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 in a defined population: epidemiological, genetic and prenatal observations. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23 (10) 856-860
• 7 Kosho T, Carey JC. Does medical intervention affect outcome in infants with trisomy 18 or trisomy 13?. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170A [phone]
• 8 Kosho T, Kuniba H, Tanikawa Y, Hashimoto Y, Sakurai H. Natural history and parental experience of children with trisomy 18 based on a questionnaire given to a Japanese trisomy 18 parental support group. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A [phone]
• 9 Carey JC. Emerging evidence that medical and surgical interventions improve the survival and outcome in the trisomy 13 and 18 syndromes. Am J Med Genet A 2020; 182 (01) 13-14
• 10 Goel N, Morris JK, Tucker D. et al. Trisomy 13 and 18-prevalence and mortality: a multi-registry population based analysis. Am J Med Genet A 2019; 179 (12) 2382-2392
• 11 Meyer RE, Liu G, Gilboa SM. et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Survival of children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18: a multi-state population-based study. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170A [phone]
• 12 Kosho T, Nakamura T, Kawame H, Baba A, Tamura M, Fukushima Y. Neonatal management of trisomy 18: clinical details of 24 patients receiving intensive treatment. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 140 (09) 937-944
• 13 Nishi E, Takamizawa S, Iio K. et al. Surgical intervention for esophageal atresia in patients with trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet A 2014; 164A [phone]
• 14 Shapiro MC, Henderson CM, Hutton N, Boss RD. Defining pediatric chronic critical illness for clinical care, research, and policy. Hosp Pediatr 2017; 7 (04) 236-244
• 15 Morse JM. “Data were saturated . . . ”. Qual Health Res 2015; 25 (05) 587-588
• 16 Feeley N, Genest C, Niela-Vilén H, Charbonneau L, Axelin A. Parents and nurses balancing parent-infant closeness and separation: a qualitative study of NICU nurses' perceptions. BMC Pediatr 2016; 16: 134
• 17 Kyc SJ, Bruno CJ, Shabanova V, Montgomery AM. Perceptions of neonatal palliative care: similarities and differences between medical and nursing staff in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. J Palliat Med 2020; 23 (05) 662-669
• 18 Şener Taplak A, Gürol A, Polat S. Nurses' perceptions of the palliative care needs of neonates with multiple congenital anomalies. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2020; 22 (02) 137-144
• 19 Franck LS, Axelin A. Differences in parents', nurses' and physicians' views of NICU parent support. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102 (06) 590-596
• 20 Hamric AB. Moral distress and nurse-physician relationships. Virtual Mentor 2010; 12 (01) 6-11
• 21 Latour JM, Hazelzet JA, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Goudoever JB. Perceptions of parents, nurses, and physicians on neonatal intensive care practices. J Pediatr 2010; 157 (02) 215-220 e213
• 22 Hamric AB, Blackhall LJ. Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate. Crit Care Med 2007; 35 (02) 422-429
• 23 Carey JC, Kosho T. Perspectives on the care and advances in the management of children with trisomy 13 and 18. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2016; 172 (03) 249-250
• 24 Baty BJ, Jorde LB, Blackburn BL, Carey JC. Natural history of trisomy 18 and trisomy 13: II. Psychomotor development. Am J Med Genet 1994; 49 (02) 189-194
• 25 Swanson TM, Patel A, Baxter AJ, Morris SA, Maskatia SA, Lantos JD. Pediatric cardiology specialist's opinions toward the acceptability of comfort care for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2020; 41 (06) 1160-1165
• 26 Pallotto I, Lantos JD. Treatment decisions for babies with trisomy 13 and 18. HEC Forum 2017; 29 (03) 213-222
• 27 Janvier A, Farlow B, Wilfond BS. The experience of families with children with trisomy 13 and 18 in social networks. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (02) 293-298
• 28 Weaver MS, Starr LJ, Austin PN, Stevenson CL, Hammel JM. Eliciting narratives to inform care for infants with trisomy 18. Pediatrics 2018; 142 (04) e20180321
• 29 Weaver MS, Birge N, Hsu H. et al. Mixed method study of quality of life for children with trisomy 18 and 13 after cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young 2020; 30 (02) 231-237
• 30 Kusztrich A, Hüseman D, Garten L, Neitzel H, Bührer C. [Survival, medical care and quality of life in children with trisomy 13 and 18]. Klin Padiatr 2016; 228 (05) 240-244
• 31 Adams SY, Tucker R, Clark MA, Lechner BE. “Quality of life”: parent and neonatologist perspectives. J Perinatol 2020
• 32 Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington KJ, Bourque CJ, Brazg T, Wilfond B. Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med 2020; 34 (03) 262-271
• 33 Arthur JD, Gupta D. “You can carry the torch now:” a qualitative analysis of parents' experiences caring for a child with trisomy 13 or 18. HEC Forum 2017; 29 (03) 223-240
• 34 Fahner JC, Thölking TW, Rietjens JAC, van der Heide A, van Delden JJM, Kars MC. Towards advance care planning in pediatrics: a qualitative study on envisioning the future as parents of a seriously ill child. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179 (09) 1461-1468
• 35 Edwardsen GE. Use of social media as a support network in families with a child diagnosed with trisomy 13, 18, or 21. University of South Carolina; Accessed 2013 at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2255&context=etd
• 36 Zuniga-Villanueva G, Widger K, Medeiros C, Trenholm M, Streuli JC. Specialized pediatric palliative care in neonates with life-limiting illness: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol 2020
• 37 Brown MS, Ohlinger J, Rusk C, Delmore P, Ittmann P. CARE Group. Implementing potentially better practices for multidisciplinary team building: creating a neonatal intensive care unit culture of collaboration. Pediatrics 2003; 111 (4 Pt 2): e482-e488
• 38 Drach LL, Hansen DA, King TM, Sibinga EMS. Communication between neonatologists and parents when prognosis is uncertain. J Perinatol 2020; 40 (09) 1412-1422
• 39 Haward MF, Lantos J, Janvier A. POST Group. Helping parents cope in the NICU. Pediatrics 2020; 145 (06) e20193567
• 40 Peng NH, Liu HF, Wang TM, Chang YC, Lee HY, Liang HF. Evaluation of comfort and confidence of neonatal clinicians in providing palliative care. J Palliat Med 2018; 21 (11) 1558-1565
• 41 Salazar MK. Interviewer bias. How it affects survey research. AAOHN J 1990; 38 (12) 567-572
• 42 Choi BC, Pak AW. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis 2005; 2 (01) A13
• 43 Brelsford GM, Doheny KK. Religious and spiritual journeys: brief reflections from mothers and fathers in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Pastoral Psychol 2016; 65 (01) 79-87
• 44 Brelsford GM, Ramirez J, Veneman K, Doheny KK. Sacred spaces: religious and secular coping and family relationships in the neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care 2016; 16 (04) 315-322
• 45 Thorvilson MJ, Copeland AJ. Incompatible with care: examining trisomy 18 medical discourse and families' counter-discourse for recuperative ethos. J Med Humanit 2018; 39 (03) 349-360
• 46 Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington KJ. Parental hopes, interventions, and survival of neonates with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2016; 172 (03) 279-287
• 47 N GBR. Guidelines for neonatal respiratory failure. ELSO neonatal respiratory failure supplement to the ELSO general guidelines version 14. Accessed 2017 at: https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/ELSOGuidelinesNeonatalRespiratoryFailurev1_4.pdf
• 48 Chapman RL, Peterec SM, Bizzarro MJ, Mercurio MR. Patient selection for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: beyond severity of illness. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (09) 606-611
• 49 Kuo KW, Barbaro RP, Gadepalli SK, Davis MM, Bartlett RH, Odetola FO. Should extracorporeal membrane oxygenation be offered? An international survey. J Pediatr 2017; 182: 107-113
• 50 West KW, Bengston K, Rescorla FJ, Engle WA, Grosfeld JL. Delayed surgical repair and ECMO improves survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ann Surg 1992; 216 (04) 454-460 , discussion 460–462
• 51 Furlong-Dillard JM, Amula V, Bailly DK, Bleyl SB, Wilkes J, Bratton SL. Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mortality in pediatric cardiac surgery patients with genetic conditions: a multicenter analysis. Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies 2017; 18 (09) 850-858
• 52 Alore EA, Fallon SC, Thomas JA, Vogel AM. Outcomes after extracorporeal life support cannulation in pediatric patients with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. J Surg Res 2020; 257: 260-266
• 53 Cummings BM, Mercurio MR, Paris JJ. A review of approaches for resolving disputes between physicians and families on end-of-life care for newborns. J Perinatol 2020; 40 (09) 1441-1445