Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2022; 39(06): 666-670
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718738
Original Article

Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation: A Retrospective Chart Review

Yaser A.H. Ali 
1   Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Section of Neonatology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
,
Mary M. Seshia
1   Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Section of Neonatology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
,
Ebtihal Ali
1   Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Section of Neonatology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
,
Ruben Alvaro
1   Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Section of Neonatology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to review the feasibility of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) in preventing reintubation in preterm infants.

Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of all premature newborn infants placed on NHFOV in a single-center neonatal intensive care unit.

Results Twenty-seven patients (birth weight: 765 ± 186 g, gestational age: 28 ± 2 weeks) were commenced on NHFOV on 32 occasions. NHFOV was used immediately postextubation as the primary mode of noninvasive ventilation (NIV; prophylaxis) in 10 of 32 occasions and as “rescue” (failure of NCPAP or biphasic CPAP) in 22 of 32 occasions. Treatment with NHFOV was successful in 22 occasions (69%) while on 10 occasions (31%) reintubation was required within 72 hours. In the rescue group, there was significant reduction in the mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of apneas (0.9 ± 1.07 vs. 0.3 ± 0.29, p < 0.005), but there were no significant changes in the PCO2 level (52 [ ±  9.8] vs. 52 [ ±  8.6] mm Hg, p = 0.8), or the FiO2 requirement (0.39 ± 0.19 vs. 0.33 ± 0.10, p = 0.055) before and after commencing NHFOV, respectively.

Conclusion The use of NHFOV is feasible as a prophylactic or rescue mode of NIV following extubation and was associated with decrease in the number of apneas without significant changes in PCO2 or oxygen requirements. A well-designed randomized control trial is needed to determine the indications, clinical outcomes, and safety of this treatment modality.

Key Points

  • NHFOV is a new and evolving mode of noninvasive ventilation.

  • The use of NHFOV is feasible as a prophylactic or rescue mode of noninvasive ventilation.

  • A well-designed randomized control is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NHFOV safe.

Keywords

neonatal - noninvasive - high-frequency oscillatory - ventilation


Publication History

Received: 13 May 2020

Accepted: 11 September 2020

Article published online:
19 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, Yoder BA, Chiu A, Roberts RS. NIPPV Study Group. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (07) 611-620
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, Herrmann D. Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (02) 300-307
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Verder H. Nasal CPAP has become an indispensable part of the primary treatment of newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96 (04) 482-484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 van der Hoeven M, Brouwer E, Blanco CE. Nasal high frequency ventilation in neonates with moderate respiratory insufficiency. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 79 (01) F61-F63
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Dumas De La Roque E, Bertrand C, Tandonnet O. et al. Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn: a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT00556738). Pediatr Pulmonol 2011; 46 (03) 218-223
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Colaizy TT, Younis UMM, Bell EF, Klein JM. Nasal high-frequency ventilation for premature infants. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97 (11) 1518-1522
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Mukerji A, Sarmiento K, Lee B, Hassall K, Shah V. Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation versus bi-phasic continuous positive airway pressure (BP-CPAP) following CPAP failure in infants <1250 g: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (01) 49-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Zhu X-W, Zhao J-N, Tang S-F, Yan J, Shi Y. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome: A preliminary report. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017; 52 (08) 1038-1042
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Mukerji A, Singh B, Helou SE. et al. Use of noninvasive high-frequency ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective review. Am J Perinatol 2015; 30 (02) 171-176
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Klotz D, Schneider H, Schumann S, Mayer B, Fuchs H. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants: a randomised controlled cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018; 103 (04) F1-F5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Li J, Li X, Huang X, Zhang Z. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Respir Res 2019; 20 (01) 58
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Fischer HS, Bohlin K, Bührer C. et al. Nasal high-frequency oscillation ventilation in neonates: a survey in five European countries. Eur J Pediatr 2015; 174 (04) 465-471
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Mukerji A, Shah PS, Shivananda S. et al; Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators. Survey of noninvasive respiratory support practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr 2017; 106 (03) 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 De Luca D, Dell'Orto V. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates: review of physiology, biology and clinical data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; 101 (06) F565-F570
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 De Luca D, Piastra M, Pietrini D, Conti G. Effect of amplitude and inspiratory time in a bench model of non-invasive HFOV through nasal prongs. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012; 47 (10) 1012-1018
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hoehn T, Krause MF. Effective elimination of carbon dioxide by nasopharyngeal high-frequency ventilation. Respir Med 2000; 94 (11) 1132-1134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Yoder BA, Albertine KH, Null Jr DM. High-frequency ventilation for non-invasive respiratory support of neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 21 (03) 162-173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 De Luca D. Noninvasive high-frequency ventilation and the errors from the past: designing simple trials neglecting complex respiratory physiology. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (09) 1065-1066
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Smith VC, Kelty-Stephen D, Qureshi Ahmad M. et al. Stochastic resonance effects on apnea, bradycardia, and oxygenation: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (06) e1561-e1568
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Almagrbi A, Ruppert T. RAM cannula and flexi trunk interfaces: a bench analysis. Respir Care 2019; 64 (Suppl. 10) 3238782
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Matlock DN, Bai S, Weisner MD. et al. Tidal volume transmission during non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation via RAM cannula. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (05) 723-729
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar