PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(05): 445-452
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718551
Original Article

A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator versus Radial Forearm Flap for Tongue Reconstruction

Marcus J.M. Ng
1   Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Cindy S.L. Goh 
2   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
,
Ngian Chye Tan
3   SingHealth Duke-NUS Head and Neck Center, SingHealth, Singapore
,
David H. Song
4   Department of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
,
Adrian S.H. Ooi 
2   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
3   SingHealth Duke-NUS Head and Neck Center, SingHealth, Singapore
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background For tongue reconstruction, the radial forearm flap (RFF) is commonly used. In the last decade, the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has been successfully used with reportedly superior donor-site outcomes. Our study is the first to compare the RFF and MSAP for reconstruction of partial glossectomy defects (<50% of tongue).

Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 20 patients with partial glossectomy defects reconstructed at a tertiary referral center. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Objective measures of speech, swallowing, and subjective patient satisfaction with their donor site were recorded.

Results Ten RFF and MSAP were each used, with a mean partial glossectomy defect size of 40.5 and 43.5%, respectively. The MSAP was significantly thicker (7.8 vs. 4.3 mm, p < 0.05) with a longer harvest time (122.5 vs. 75.0 minutes, p < 0.05). There were no cases of free flap failure. Donor-site healing times were comparable, but the MSAP group experienced significantly less donor-site complications (n = 1 vs. n = 7, p < 0.05). Functional outcomes were comparable with 13 patients achieving normal speech and diet after 3 months (MSAP = 6 vs. RFF = 7, p = 1.00). All patients were satisfied with their donor-site outcome with the MSAP group having a marginally higher score.

Conclusion Both flaps are good options for partial glossectomy reconstruction. Though more challenging to harvest, the MSAP gives comparable functional results and has become our first reconstructive option given its superior donor-site outcomes.

Keywords

medial sural artery perforator flap - radial forearm flap - tongue reconstruction - free tissue transfer - head and neck reconstruction

Note

This study was presented at the Plastic Aesthetic Surgery Meeting 2018 in Singapore.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 02. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Oktober 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Bokhari WA, Wang SJ. Tongue reconstruction: recent advances. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 15 (04) 202-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chen SL, Chen TM, Dai NT, Hsia YJ, Lin YS. Medial sural artery perforator flap for tongue and floor of mouth reconstruction. Head Neck 2008; 30 (03) 351-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 He Y, Jin SF, Zhang ZY, Feng SQ, Zhang CP, Zhang YX. A prospective study of medial sural artery perforator flap with computed tomographic angiography-aided design in tongue reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72 (11) 2351-2365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hung SY, Loh CY, Kwon SH, Tsai CH, Chang KP, Kao HK. Assessing the suitability of medial sural artery perforator flaps in tongue reconstruction - an outcome study. PLoS One 2017; 12 (02) e0171570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Schneider DS, Wu V, Wax MK. Indications for pedicled pectoralis major flap in a free tissue transfer practice. Head Neck 2012; 34 (08) 1106-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Harii K, Ebihara S, Ono I. Radial forearm flap in reconstruction following surgery for head and neck cancers. Auris Nasus Larynx 1985; 12 (Suppl. 02) S44-S47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jacobson MC, Franssen E, Fliss DM, Birt BD, Gilbert RW. Free forearm flap in oral reconstruction. Functional outcome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121 (09) 959-964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Santamaria E, Granados M, Barrera-Franco JL. Radial forearm free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction: versatility and reliability of a single donor site. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (04) 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Santamaria E, Wei FC, Chen IH, Chuang DC. Sensation recovery on innervated radial forearm flap for hemiglossectomy reconstruction by using different recipient nerves. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (02) 450-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Özkan HS, İrkören S, Aydın OE, Eryılmaz A, Karaca H. Medial sural artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (12) 4431-4436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Toyserkani NM, Sørensen JA. Medial sural artery perforator flap: a challenging free flap. Eur J Plast Surg 2015; 38 (05) 391-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal DK. Likert scale: explored and explained. Cur J Appl Sci Technol 2015; 7 (04) 396-403
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Preedy VR, Watson RR. Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. New York, NY: Springer; 2010
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wong CH, Lin JY, Wei FC. The bottom-up approach to the suprafascial harvest of the radial forearm flap. Am J Surg 2008; 196 (05) e60-e64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kimata Y, Sakuraba M, Hishinuma S. et al. Analysis of the relations between the shape of the reconstructed tongue and postoperative functions after subtotal or total glossectomy. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (05) 905-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nakayama Y, Soeda S, Iino T. A radial forearm flap based on an extended dissection of the cephalic vein. The longest venous pedicle? Case report. Br J Plast Surg 1986; 39 (04) 454-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zheng L, Dong Z, Zheng J. Cephalic vein-pedicled radial forearm semi-free flap: an alternative when no suitable vein in recipient site for free forearm flap. J Hand Microsurg 2015; 7 (01) 87-90
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Akashi M, Hashikawa K, Sakakibara A, Komori T, Terashi H. Long-term follow-up study of radial forearm free flap reconstruction after hemiglossectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (01) 44-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chalmers RL, Rahman KM, Young S. et al. The medial sural artery perforator flap in intra-oral reconstruction: a northeast experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (05) 687-693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 de Vicente JC, de Villalaín L, Torre A, Peña I. Microvascular free tissue transfer for tongue reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: a functional assessment of radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66 (11) 2270-2275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Li X, Sun Q, Guo S. Functional assessments in patients undergoing radial forearm flap following hemiglossectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (02) e172-e175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fang QG, Shi S, Zhang X, Li ZN, Liu FY, Sun CF. Upper extremity morbidity after radial forearm flap harvest: a prospective study. J Int Med Res 2014; 42 (01) 231-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Richardson D, Fisher SE, Vaughan ED, Brown JS. Radial forearm flap donor-site complications and morbidity: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (01) 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Choi JW, Nam SY, Choi SH, Roh JL, Kim SY, Hong JP. Applications of medial sural perforator free flap for head and neck reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (07) 437-442
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Song X, Wu H, Zhang W. et al. Medial sural artery perforator flap for postsurgical reconstruction of head and neck cancer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (04) 319-326
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Huang CH, Chen HC, Huang YL, Mardini S, Feng GM. Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (07) 1704-1710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Soutar DS, McGregor IA. The radial forearm flap in intraoral reconstruction: the experience of 60 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Baas M, Duraku LS, Corten EM, Mureau MA. A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: does improved sensibility imply functional benefits?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (08) 1025-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Daar DA, Abdou SA, Cohen JM, Wilson SC, Levine JP. Is the medial sural artery perforator flap a new workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (02) 393e-403e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cavadas PC, Sanz-Giménez-Rico JR, Gutierrez-de la Cámara A, Navarro-Monzonís A, Soler-Nomdedeu S, Martínez-Soriano F. The medial sural artery perforator free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (06) 1609-1615 , discussion 1616–1617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Chen SL, Yu CC, Chang MC, Deng SC, Wu YS, Chen TM. Medial sural artery perforator flap for intraoral reconstruction following cancer ablation. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (03) 274-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 He Y, Jin SF, Zhang CP, Zhang ZY. Medial sural artery perforator flap aided by preoperative computed tomography angiography mapping for tongue reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43 (09) 1064-1068
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kao HK, Chang KP, Chen YA, Wei FC, Cheng MH. Anatomical basis and versatile application of the free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (04) 1135-1145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Grinsell D, Yue BY. The functional free innervated medial gastrocnemius flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (07) 451-456
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kao H-K, Chang K-P, Wei F-C, Cheng M-H. Comparison of the medial sural artery perforator flap with the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (04) 1125-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zhao W, Li Z, Wu L, Zhu H, Liu J, Wang H. Medial sural artery perforator flap aided by ultrasonic perforator localization for reconstruction after oral carcinoma resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (05) 1063-1071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mao C, Zhang L, Cui QJ, Peng X, Wang Y, Yu GY. [A preliminary study on free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction following tumor ablation]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2011; 46 (12) 742-746
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wang X, Mei J, Pan J, Chen H, Zhang W, Tang M. Reconstruction of distal limb defects with the free medial sural artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 95-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Liang MD, Swartz WM, Jones NF. Local full-thickness skin-graft coverage for the radial forearm flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (03) 621-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Murray RC, Gordin EA, Saigal K, Leventhal D, Krein H, Heffelfinger RN. Reconstruction of the radial forearm free flap donor site using integra artificial dermis. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (02) 104-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Riecke B, Assaf AT, Heiland M. et al. Local full-thickness skin graft of the donor arm--a novel technique for the reduction of donor site morbidity in radial forearm free flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44 (08) 937-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Van Kouwenberg EA, Yan A, Patel A. et al. Endoscopic-assisted radial forearm free flap harvest: a novel technique to reduce donor site morbidity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 22-30
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Dusseldorp JR, Pham QJ, Ngo Q, Gianoutsos M, Moradi P. Vascular anatomy of the medial sural artery perforator flap: a new classification system of intra-muscular branching patterns. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (09) 1267-1275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Higueras Suñé MC, López Ojeda A, Narváez García JA. et al. Use of angioscanning in the surgical planning of perforator flaps in the lower extremities. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (09) 1207-1213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Saba L, Atzeni M, Rozen WM. et al. Non-invasive vascular imaging in perforator flap surgery. Acta Radiol 2013; 54 (01) 89-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar