The Double Stitch Everting Technique in the End-to-Side Microvascular Anastomosis: Validation of the Technique Using a Randomized N-of-1 Trial

Abstract

Background The double stitch everting (DSE) technique, in which time is won by leaving the needle inside the vessel wall in-between stitching, is a modification of the end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis in the interest of reducing anastomosis time. This ensures proper wall eversion, intima-to-intima contact, and improved suture symmetry.

Methods We designed an N-of-1 randomized trial with each microsurgeon as their own control. We included 10 microsurgeons of different levels of experience who were then asked to perform classic and DSE ETS anastomoses on the chicken leg and rat femoral models. Every anastomosis was cut and evaluated using blinded assessment. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze the results and for confounder adjustment.

Results A total of 210 anastomoses were performed, of which 177 on the chicken leg and 43 on the rat femoral artery and vein. From the 210 anastomoses, 111 were performed using the classic technique and 99 using the DSE technique. The mean anastomosis time was 28.8 ± 11.3 minutes in the classic group and 24.6 ± 12 minutes in the DSE group (p < 0.001, t-test). There was a significant reduction (p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA) in the number of mistakes when using the DSE technique (mean 5.5 ± 2.6) compared with those using the classic technique (mean 7.7 ± 3.4).

Conclusion The DSE technique for ETS anastomoses improves anastomoses times in experienced and moderately experienced microsurgeons while also improving or maintaining suture symmetry and lowering the number of mistakes.

Keywords

anastomosis technique - validation study - cerebrovascular

Publication History

Received: 16 June 2020

Accepted: 02 September 2020

Article published online:
14 October 2020

• References

• 1 Alghoul MS, Gordon CR, Yetman R. et al. From simple interrupted to complex spiral: a systematic review of various suture techniques for microvascular anastomoses. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (01) 72-80
• 2 Cobbett J. Small vessel anastomosis. A comparison of suture techniques. Br J Plast Surg 1967; 20 (01) 16-20
• 3 Cho EH, Garcia RM, Blau J. et al. Microvascular anastomoses using end-to-end versus end-to-side technique in lower extremity free tissue transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (02) 114-120
• 4 Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Heine-Geldern A, Herter F, Broer PN. End-to-end versus end-to-side anastomoses in free flap reconstruction: single centre experiences. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017; 51 (05) 362-365
• 5 Broer PN, Moellhoff N, Mayer JM, Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Ehrl D. Comparison of outcomes of end-to-end versus end-to-side anastomoses in lower extremity free flap reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (06) 432-437
• 6 Ahmadi I, Herle P, Miller G, Hunter-Smith DJ, Leong J, Rozen WM. End-to-end versus end-to-side microvascular anastomosis: a meta-analysis of free flap outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (06) 402-411
• 7 Ooi ASH, Butz DR, Fisher SM, Collier ZJ, Gottlieb LJ. Geometric three-dimensional end-to-side microvascular anastomosis: a simple and reproducible technique. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 258-263
• 8 Samson D, Batjer HH, Bowman G. et al. A clinical study of the parameters and effects of temporary arterial occlusion in the management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1994; 34 (01) 22-28 , discussion 28–29
• 9 Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb Jr RL, Videen TO, Adams Jr HP, Derdeyn CP. COSS Investigators. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the carotid occlusion surgery study randomized trial. JAMA 2011; 306 (18) 1983-1992
• 10 Grubb Jr RL, Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Videen TO, Adams Jr HP, Derdeyn CP. Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study Investigators. Surgical results of the carotid occlusion surgery study. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (01) 25-33
• 11 Volovici V, Dammers R, Zamfirescu DG. The double stitch everting technique in end-to-side vascular anastomoses. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (01) 88-89
• 12 Foucher G, Schuind F. A new trick for end-to-end anastomosis in microvascular surgery. Modified Harashina procedure. J Reconstr Microsurg 1984; 1 (01) 49-51
• 13 Harashina T. End-to-side anastomosis of the vein: a technical innovation. Microsurgery 1983; 4 (02) 113-114
• 14 Volovici V, Dammers R, Lawton MT. et al. The flower petal training system in microsurgery: validation of a training model using a randomized controlled trial. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 83 (06) 697-701
• 15 Kravitz RL, Duan N. ed, and the DEcIDE Methods Center N-of-1 Guidance Panel (Duan N, Eslick I, Gabler NB, Kaplan HC, Kravitz RL, Larson EB, Pace WD, Schmid CH, Sim I, Vohra S). Design and Implementation of N-of-1 Trials: A User's Guide. AHRQ Publication No. 13(14)-EHC122-EF. 2014
• 16 Pafitanis G, Veljanoski D, Ghanem AM, Myers S. Intimal surface suture line (end-product) assessment of end-to-side microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (07) e1409
• 17 Javid P, Aydın A, Mohanna PN, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Current status of simulation and training models in microsurgery: a systematic review. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (07) 655-668
• 18 Yin X, Ye G, Lu J. et al. A novel rat model for comprehensive microvascular training of end-to-end, end-to-side, and side-to-side anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (07) 499-504
• 19 Levi MA, Harb AA, Nicolas CF. et al. Torsion is tolerated in arterial end to venous side anastomoses in the rat model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 501-506