J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(04): 357-364
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716855
Original Article

Mechanism of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Using a Bio 3D Conduit Derived from Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts

Hirofumi Yurie
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Ryosuke Ikeguchi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Tomoki Aoyama
2   Department of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Akira Ito
2   Department of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Mai Tanaka
2   Department of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Takashi Noguchi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Hiroki Oda
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Hisataka Takeuchi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Sadaki Mitsuzawa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Maki Ando
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Koichi Yoshimoto
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Shizuka Akieda
3   Cyfuse Biomedical K.K., Tokyo, Japan
,
Koichi Nakayama
4   Department of Regenerative Medicine and Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
,
Shuichi Matsuda
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, grant number: 15K10441. Cyfuse Biomedical K.K. provided the bioprinter “Regenova,” which was used in this experiment to construct the Bio three-dimensional conduit and contributed financially to this study under the Collaborative Research Agreement of Kyoto University. Cyfuse was not involved in any experimental methods, data collection, evaluation of the results, or preparation of the manuscript.

Abstract

Background We previously reported the development of a scaffold-free Bio three-dimensional (3D) nerve conduit from normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDFs). The aim of this study was to investigate the regenerative mechanism of peripheral nerve cells using a Bio 3D conduit in a rat sciatic nerve defect model.

Methods Bio 3D conduits composed of NHDFs were developed, and cell viability was evaluated using a LIVE/DEAD cell viability assay immediately before transplantation and 1-week post-surgery. Tracking analysis using PKH26-labeled NHDFs was performed to assess the distribution of NHDFs within the regenerated nerve and the differentiation of NHDFs into functional Schwann cells (SCs).

Results The assessment of the viability of cells within the Bio 3D conduit showed high cell viability both immediately before transplantation and 1-week post-surgery (88.56 ± 1.70 and 87.58 ± 9.11, respectively). A modified Masson's trichrome staining of the Bio 3D conduit revealed the formation of a prominent extracellular matrix (ECM) in between the cells. We observed, via tracking analysis, that the tube-like distribution of the NHDFs remained stable, the majority of the regenerated axons had penetrated this structure and PKH26-labeled cells were also positive for S-100.

Conclusion Abundant ECM formation resulted in a stable tube-like structure of the Bio 3D conduit with high cell viability. NHDFs in the Bio 3D conduit have the potential to differentiate into SCs-like cells.



Publication History

Received: 06 June 2020

Accepted: 15 August 2020

Article published online:
21 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (03) 391-414
  • 2 Millesi H. Techniques for nerve grafting. Hand Clin 2000; 16 (01) 73-91 , viii
  • 3 Kim DH, Han K, Tiel RL, Murovic JA, Kline DG. Surgical outcomes of 654 ulnar nerve lesions. J Neurosurg 2003; 98 (05) 993-1004
  • 4 Fowler JR, Lavasani M, Huard J, Goitz RJ. Biologic strategies to improve nerve regeneration after peripheral nerve repair. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (04) 243-248
  • 5 Konofaos P, Ver Halen JP. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: past, present, future. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (03) 149-164
  • 6 Wang Y, Li ZW, Luo M, Li YJ, Zhang KQ. Biological conduits combining bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular matrix to treat long-segment sciatic nerve defects. Neural Regen Res 2015; 10 (06) 965-971
  • 7 de Luca AC, Lacour SP, Raffoul W, di Summa PG. Extracellular matrix components in peripheral nerve repair: how to affect neural cellular response and nerve regeneration?. Neural Regen Res 2014; 9 (22) 1943-1948
  • 8 Kakinoki R, Nishijima N, Ueba Y, Oka M, Yamamuro T. Relationship between axonal regeneration and vascularity in tubulation—an experimental study in rats. Neurosci Res 1995; 23 (01) 35-45
  • 9 Kaizawa Y, Kakinoki R, Ikeguchi R. et al. Bridging a 30 mm defect in the canine ulnar nerve using vessel-containing conduits with implantation of bone marrow stromal cells. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (04) 316-324
  • 10 Cuevas P, Carceller F, Dujovny M. et al. Peripheral nerve regeneration by bone marrow stromal cells. Neurol Res 2002; 24 (07) 634-638
  • 11 Cuevas P, Carceller F, Garcia-Gómez I, Yan M, Dujovny M. Bone marrow stromal cell implantation for peripheral nerve repair. Neurol Res 2004; 26 (02) 230-232
  • 12 Chen X, Wang XD, Chen G, Lin WW, Yao J, Gu XS. Study of in vivo differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells into Schwann cell-like cells. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (02) 111-115
  • 13 Chen CJ, Ou YC, Liao SL. et al. Transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells for peripheral nerve repair. Exp Neurol 2007; 204 (01) 443-453
  • 14 Yamakawa T, Kakinoki R, Ikeguchi R, Nakayama K, Morimoto Y, Nakamura T. Nerve regeneration promoted in a tube with vascularity containing bone marrow-derived cells. Cell Transplant 2007; 16 (08) 811-822
  • 15 Wang D, Liu XL, Zhu JK. et al. Bridging small-gap peripheral nerve defects using acellular nerve allograft implanted with autologous bone marrow stromal cells in primates. Brain Res 2008; 1188: 44-53
  • 16 Nijhuis TH, Brzezicki G, Klimczak A, Siemionow M. Isogenic venous graft supported with bone marrow stromal cells as a natural conduit for bridging a 20 mm nerve gap. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (08) 639-645
  • 17 Ding F, Wu J, Yang Y. et al. Use of tissue-engineered nerve grafts consisting of a chitosan/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based scaffold included with bone marrow mesenchymal cells for bridging 50-mm dog sciatic nerve gaps. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16 (12) 3779-3790
  • 18 Siemionow M, Duggan W, Brzezicki G. et al. Peripheral nerve defect repair with epineural tubes supported with bone marrow stromal cells: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67 (01) 73-84
  • 19 Jesuraj NJ, Santosa KB, Newton P. et al. A systematic evaluation of Schwann cell injection into acellular cold-preserved nerve grafts. J Neurosci Methods 2011; 197 (02) 209-215
  • 20 Walsh SK, Kumar R, Grochmal JK, Kemp SW, Forden J, Midha R. Fate of stem cell transplants in peripheral nerves. Stem Cell Res (Amst) 2012; 8 (02) 226-238
  • 21 Chiriac S, Facca S, Diaconu M, Gouzou S, Liverneaux P. Experience of using the bioresorbable copolyester poly(DL-lactide-ε-caprolactone) nerve conduit guide Neurolac™ for nerve repair in peripheral nerve defects: report on a series of 28 lesions. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (04) 342-349
  • 22 Jansen K, Meek MF, van der Werff JF, van Wachem PB, van Luyn MJ. Long-term regeneration of the rat sciatic nerve through a biodegradable poly(DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) nerve guide: tissue reactions with focus on collagen III/IV reformation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 69 (02) 334-341
  • 23 Yurie H, Ikeguchi R, Aoyama T. et al. The efficacy of a scaffold-free Bio 3D conduit developed from human fibroblasts on peripheral nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve model. PLoS One 2017; 12 (02) e0171448
  • 24 Wang J, Ding F, Gu Y, Liu J, Gu X. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote cell proliferation and neurotrophic function of Schwann cells in vitro and in vivo. Brain Res 2009; 1262: 7-15
  • 25 Levin AS, Chen CT, Torzilli PA. Effect of tissue maturity on cell viability in load-injured articular cartilage explants. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13 (06) 488-496
  • 26 Bekeredjian R, Walton CB, MacCannell KA. et al. Conditional HIF-1 alpha expression produces a reversible cardiomyopathy. PLoS One 2010; 5 (07) e11693
  • 27 Zwaans BM, Krueger S, Bartolone SN, Chancellor MB, Marples B, Lamb LE. Modeling of chronic radiation-induced cystitis in mice. Adv Radiat Oncol 2016; 1 (04) 333-343
  • 28 Pabari A, Yang SY, Mosahebi A, Seifalian AM. Recent advances in artificial nerve conduit design: strategies for the delivery of luminal fillers. J Control Release 2011; 156 (01) 2-10
  • 29 Daly W, Yao L, Zeugolis D, Windebank A, Pandit A. A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery. J R Soc Interface 2012; 9 (67) 202-221
  • 30 Nakayama K, Takakuda K, Koyama Y. et al. Enhancement of peripheral nerve regeneration using bioabsorbable polymer tubes packed with fibrin gel. Artif Organs 2007; 31 (07) 500-508
  • 31 Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci 2010; 123 (Pt 24): 4195-4200
  • 32 Parrinello S, Napoli I, Ribeiro S. et al. EphB signaling directs peripheral nerve regeneration through Sox2-dependent Schwann cell sorting. Cell 2010; 143 (01) 145-155
  • 33 Thoma EC, Merkl C, Heckel T. et al. Chemical conversion of human fibroblasts into functional Schwann cells. Stem Cell Reports 2014; 3 (04) 539-547
  • 34 Lai PL, Lin H, Chen SF. et al. Efficient generation of chemically induced mesenchymal stem cells from human dermal fibroblasts. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 44534
  • 35 Shin RH, Friedrich PF, Crum BA, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Treatment of a segmental nerve defect in the rat with use of bioabsorbable synthetic nerve conduits: a comparison of commercially available conduits. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (09) 2194-2204
  • 36 Kingham PJ, Terenghi G. Bioengineered nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation. J Anat 2006; 209 (04) 511-526
  • 37 Podhajsky RJ, Myers RR. The vascular response to nerve crush: relationship to Wallerian degeneration and regeneration. Brain Res 1993; 623 (01) 117-123
  • 38 Weerasuriya A. Patterns of change in endoneurial capillary permeability and vascular space during nerve regeneration. Brain Res 1990; 510 (01) 135-139
  • 39 Hobson MI, Green CJ, Terenghi G. VEGF enhances intraneural angiogenesis and improves nerve regeneration after axotomy. J Anat 2000; 197 (Pt 4): 591-605
  • 40 Chopp M, Li Y. Treatment of neural injury with marrow stromal cells. Lancet Neurol 2002; 1 (02) 92-100
  • 41 Crigler L, Robey RC, Asawachaicharn A, Gaupp D, Phinney DG. Human mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations express a variety of neuro-regulatory molecules and promote neuronal cell survival and neuritogenesis. Exp Neurol 2006; 198 (01) 54-64