J Knee Surg 2022; 35(06): 645-652
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716416
Original Article

Poor Outcome of Above-Knee Amputation after Septic Failure of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Sabrina Böhle
1   Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Eisenberg, Germany
,
Sebastian Rohe
1   Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Eisenberg, Germany
,
Julia Kirschberg
1   Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Eisenberg, Germany
,
Olaf Brinkmann
1   Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Eisenberg, Germany
,
Jörn Seeger
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany
,
Timo Zippelius
1   Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Eisenberg, Germany
,
Georg Matziolis
1   Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Eisenberg, Germany
,
Eric Röhner
1   Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Eisenberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Persistent periprosthetic infection following total knee arthroplasty is one of the most dreaded complications of orthopaedic surgery. Treatment strategies include arthrodesis of the knee joint, stable fistula, long-lasting antibiotic therapy, or above-knee amputation. The advantage of amputation in comparison to other treatment options is the possible cure of infection, because the source of infection is removed and no foreign material left in situ. The aim of the study is to examine whether a septic amputation of the femur in case of persistent periprosthetic infection at the knee joint leads to the healing of the patient. Moreover, the physical and mental state should be evaluated. All patients with above-knee amputation because of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty between 2016 and 2018 were included in this retrospective study. A questionnaire with the clinical scores visual analog scale, modified Lysholm, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and 36-Item Short Form Survey has been designed. In addition, all characteristics and perioperative data were documented. Eleven patients were included in the study. One patient died after above-knee amputation; all other patients live with a marked impairment of quality of life but with absence of the infection of the leg. Two out of ten are able to walk regularly with an exoprosthesis with forearm crutches, 50% are in a wheelchair, while 30% are bedridden. Patients with above-knee amputation after persistent periprosthetic infections were free of infection and without signs of inflammation. However, this is associated with worse mobility and high mortality rate.



Publication History

Received: 27 November 2019

Accepted: 29 July 2020

Article published online:
09 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Postler A, Lützner C, Beyer F, Tille E, Lützner J. Analysis of total knee arthroplasty revision causes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19 (01) 55
  • 2 Grimberg A, Jansson V, Liebs TR, Melsheimer O, Steinbrück A. Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) Jahresbericht 2017. Mit Sicherheit mehr Qualität. Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) [German Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2017]. 2018: 1-84
  • 3 Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G, Mayr HO, Sostheim M, Hube R. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (09) 715-720
  • 4 Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Adams JB. Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant?. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (11) , Supple A ): 101-104
  • 5 Röhner E, Windisch C, Nuetzmann K, Rau M, Arnhold M, Matziolis G. Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (04) 298-301
  • 6 Lucas EM, Marais NC, DesJardins JD. Knee arthrodesis: procedures and perspectives in the US from 1993 to 2011. Springerplus 2016; 5 (01) 1606
  • 7 Carr II JB, Werner BC, Browne JA. Trends and outcomes in the treatment of failed septic total knee arthroplasty: comparing arthrodesis and above-knee amputation. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (07) 1574-1577
  • 8 Son MS, Lau E, Parvizi J, Mont MA, Bozic KJ, Kurtz S. What are the frequency, associated factors, and mortality of amputation and arthrodesis after a failed infected TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (12) 2905-2913
  • 9 Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW. Above-the-knee amputation after a total knee replacement: prevalence, etiology, and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (06) 1000-1004
  • 10 Chen AF, Kinback NC, Heyl AE, McClain EJ, Klatt BA. Better function for fusions versus above-the-knee amputations for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (10) 2737-2745
  • 11 Pring DJ, Marks L, Angel JC. Mobility after amputation for failed knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70 (05) 770-771
  • 12 Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW. et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (14) 1355-1357
  • 13 Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR. et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56 (01) e1-e25
  • 14 Cancienne JM, Granadillo VA, Patel KJ, Werner BC, Browne JA. Risk factors for repeat debridement, spacer retention, amputation, arthrodesis, and mortality after removal of an infected total knee arthroplasty with spacer placement. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (02) 515-520
  • 15 George J, Newman JM, Caravella JW, Klika AK, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA. Predicting functional outcomes after above knee amputation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (02) 532-536
  • 16 Fedorka CJ, Chen AF, McGarry WM, Parvizi J, Klatt BA. Functional ability after above-the-knee amputation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (04) 1024-1032
  • 17 Orfanos AV, Michael RJ, Keeney BJ, Moschetti WE. Patient-reported outcomes after above-knee amputation for prosthetic joint infection. Knee 2020; 27 (03) 1101-1105
  • 18 Khanna V, Tushinski DM, Soever LJ, Vincent AD, Backstein DJ. Above knee amputation following total knee arthroplasty: when enough is enough. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (04) 658-662
  • 19 Hungerer S, Kiechle M, von Rüden C, Militz M, Beitzel K, Morgenstern M. Knee arthrodesis versus above-the-knee amputation after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison of functional outcome and complication rates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 443
  • 20 Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Knee fusion or above-the-knee amputation after failed two-stage reimplantation total knee arthroplasty. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2015; 3 (04) 241-243
  • 21 McClenaghan BA, Krajbich JI, Pirone AM, Koheil R, Longmuir P. Comparative assessment of gait after limb-salvage procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71 (08) 1178-1182
  • 22 Harris IE, Leff AR, Gitelis S, Simon MA. Function after amputation, arthrodesis, or arthroplasty for tumors about the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72 (10) 1477-1485