J Knee Surg 2022; 35(06): 625-633
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716413
Original Article

Differences in Trochlear Morphology from Native Using a Femoral Component Interfaced with an Anatomical Patellar Prosthesis in Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment

1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California
2   Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, California
,
1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California
› Author Affiliations
Funding The study was supported by Medacta, Inc.

Abstract

Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty can be traced in part to alignment of the femoral component. Kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) use the same femoral component but align the component differently. Our objective was to determine differences in trochlear morphology from native for a femoral component interfaced with an anatomical patellar prosthesis in KA and MA. Ten three-dimensional femur-cartilage models were created by combining computed tomography and laser scans of native human cadaveric femurs free of skeletal abnormalities. The femoral component was positioned using KA and MA. Measurements of the prosthetic and native trochlea were made along the arc length of the native trochlear groove and differences from native were computed for the medial-lateral and radial locations of the groove and sulcus angle. Mean medial-lateral locations of the prosthetic groove were within 1.5 and 3.5 mm of native for KA and MA, respectively. Mean radial locations of the prosthetic groove were as large as 5 mm less than native for KA and differences were greater for MA. Sulcus angles of the prosthetic trochlea were 10 degrees steeper proximally, and 10 degrees flatter distally than native for both KA and MA. Largest differences from native occurred for radial locations and sulcus angles for both KA and MA. The consistency of these results with those of other fundamentally different designs which use a modified dome (i.e., sombrero hat) patellar prosthesis highlights the need to reassess the design of the prosthetic trochlea on the part of multiple manufacturers worldwide.



Publication History

Received: 25 February 2020

Accepted: 29 July 2020

Article published online:
14 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 144-153
  • 2 Briard JL, Hungerford DS. Patellofemoral instability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4: S87-S97
  • 3 Conditt MA, Noble PC, Allen B, Shen M, Parsley BS, Mathis KB. Surface damage of patellar components used in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (06) 1265-1271
  • 4 Gonzalez MH, Mekhail AO. The failed total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and etiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12 (06) 436-446
  • 5 Vince KG. Why knees fail. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (03, Suppl 1): 39-44
  • 6 Barrack RL, Burak C. Patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (389) 62-73
  • 7 Boyd Jr AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (05) 674-681
  • 8 Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Scott NW. Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1994; 2 (05) 239-246
  • 9 Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 46-55
  • 10 Sharma A, Leszko F, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Cates Jr HE, Liu F. In vivo patellofemoral forces in high flexion total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2008; 41 (03) 642-648
  • 11 Leopold SS, Silverton CD, Barden RM, Rosenberg AG. Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (01) 41-47
  • 12 Gu Y, Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. How frequently do four methods for mechanically aligning a total knee arthroplasty cause collateral ligament imbalance and change alignment from normal in white patients?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (12) e101
  • 13 Lozano R, Campanelli V, Howell S, Hull M. Kinematic alignment more closely restores the groove location and the sulcus angle of the native trochlea than mechanical alignment: implications for prosthetic design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1504-1513
  • 14 Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Paper presented at: SIGGRAPH '87 Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques; 1987
  • 15 Campanelli V, Howell SM, Hull ML. Accuracy evaluation of a lower-cost and four higher-cost laser scanners. J Biomech 2016; 49 (01) 127-131
  • 16 Ghosh KM, Merican AM, Iranpour F, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. The effect of overstuffing the patellofemoral joint on the extensor retinaculum of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (10) 1211-1216
  • 17 Mihalko W, Fishkin Z, Krackow K. Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449 (449) 283-287
  • 18 Rivière C, Iranpour F, Harris S. et al. Differences in trochlear parameters between native and prosthetic kinematically or mechanically aligned knees. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104 (02) 165-170
  • 19 Varadarajan KM, Rubash HE, Li G. Are current total knee arthroplasty implants designed to restore normal trochlear groove anatomy?. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (02) 274-281
  • 20 Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Baena FR, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. Patellar thickness and lateral retinacular release affects patellofemoral kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (03) 526-533
  • 21 Schindler OS. Basic kinematics and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint part 2: the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2012; 78 (01) 11-29
  • 22 Freedman BR, Brindle TJ, Sheehan FT. Re-evaluating the functional implications of the Q-angle and its relationship to in-vivo patellofemoral kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2014; 29 (10) 1139-1145
  • 23 Akbarshahi M, Fernandez JW, Schache AG, Pandy MG. Subject-specific evaluation of patellofemoral joint biomechanics during functional activity. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36 (09) 1122-1133
  • 24 Takeuchi T, Lathi VK, Khan AM, Hayes WC. Patellofemoral contact pressures exceed the compressive yield strength of UHMWPE in total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (03) 363-368
  • 25 Lynch AF, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1987; 2 (02) 135-140
  • 26 Mizuno Y, Kumagai M, Mattessich SM. et al. Q-angle influences tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. J Orthop Res 2001; 19 (05) 834-840
  • 27 Gu Y, Howell SM, Hull ML. Simulation of total knee arthroplasty in 5° or 7° valgus: A study of gap imbalances and changes in limb and knee alignments from native. J Orthop Res 2017; 35 (09) 2031-2039