A Web Application for Adrenal Incidentaloma Identification, Tracking, and Management Using Machine Learning

Abstract

Background Incidental radiographic findings, such as adrenal nodules, are commonly identified in imaging studies and documented in radiology reports. However, patients with such findings frequently do not receive appropriate follow-up, partially due to the lack of tools for the management of such findings and the time required to maintain up-to-date lists. Natural language processing (NLP) is capable of extracting information from free-text clinical documents and could provide the basis for software solutions that do not require changes to clinical workflows.

Objectives In this manuscript we present (1) a machine learning algorithm we trained to identify radiology reports documenting the presence of a newly discovered adrenal incidentaloma, and (2) the web application and results database we developed to manage these clinical findings.

Methods We manually annotated a training corpus of 4,090 radiology reports from across our institution with a binary label indicating whether or not a report contains a newly discovered adrenal incidentaloma. We trained a convolutional neural network to perform this text classification task. Over the NLP backbone we built a web application that allows users to coordinate clinical management of adrenal incidentalomas in real time.

Results The annotated dataset included 404 positive (9.9%) and 3,686 (90.1%) negative reports. Our model achieved a sensitivity of 92.9% (95% confidence interval: 80.9–97.5%), a positive predictive value of 83.0% (69.9–91.1)%, a specificity of 97.8% (95.8–98.9)%, and an F1 score of 87.6%. We developed a front-end web application based on the model's output.

Conclusion Developing an NLP-enabled custom web application for tracking and management of high-risk adrenal incidentalomas is feasible in a resource constrained, safety net hospital. Such applications can be used by an institution's quality department or its primary care providers and can easily be generalized to other types of clinical findings.

Keywords

incidental findings - software tools - natural language processing - electronic medical record

• References

• 1 Young Jr WF. Clinical practice. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med 2007; 356 (06) 601-610
• 2 Terzolo M, Stigliano A, Chiodini I. , et al; Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. AME position statement on adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol 2011; 164 (06) 851-870
• 3 Young Jr WF. Management approaches to adrenal incidentalomas. A view from Rochester, Minnesota. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2000; 29 (01) 159-185
• 4 Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G. , et al; Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85 (02) 637-644
• 5 Cawood TJ, Hunt PJ, O'Shea D, Cole D, Soule S. Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer that is similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink?. Eur J Endocrinol 2009; 161 (04) 513-527
• 6 Mabotuwana T, Hombal V, Dalal S, Hall CS, Gunn M. Determining adherence to follow-up imaging recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (3 Pt A) 422-428
• 7 Dang PA, Kalra MK, Blake MA. , et al. Natural language processing using online analytic processing for assessing recommendations in radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5 (03) 197-204
• 8 Sistrom CL, Dreyer KJ, Dang PP. , et al. Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology 2009; 253 (02) 453-461
• 9 Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology 2005; 234 (03) 824-832
• 10 Weingart SN, Yaghi O, Barnhart L. , et al. Preventing diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: an electronic notification tool for incomplete radiology tests. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (02) 276-285
• 11 O'Connor SD, Khorasani R, Pochebit SM, Lacson R, Andriole KP, Dalal AK. Semiautomated system for nonurgent, clinically significant pathology results. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 411-421
• 12 Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G. , et al. Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest 2006; 29 (04) 298-302
• 13 Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States. Suitland-Silver Hill, MD: United States Census Bureau; 2014
• 14 Grumbach MM, Biller BM, Braunstein GD. , et al. Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass (“incidentaloma”). Ann Intern Med 2003; 138 (05) 424-429
• 15 Nieman LK. Approach to the patient with an adrenal incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95 (09) 4106-4113
• 16 Zeiger MA, Thompson GB, Duh Q-Y. , et al; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; American Association of Endocrine Surgeons. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas. Endocr Pract 2009; 15 (Suppl. 01) 1-20
• 17 Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I. , et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 175 (02) G1-G34
• 18 Kapoor A, Morris T, Rebello R. Guidelines for the management of the incidentally discovered adrenal mass. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5 (04) 241-247
• 19 Lee JM, Kim MK, Ko SH. , et al; Korean Endocrine Society, Committee for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentaloma. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2017; 32 (02) 200-218
• 20 Feeney T, Talutis S, Janeway M. , et al. Evaluation of incidental adrenal masses at a tertiary referral and trauma center. Surgery 2020; 167 (05) 868-875
• 21 Becker J, Woloszyn J, Bold R, Campbell MJ. The adrenal incidentaloma: an opportunity to improve patient care. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33 (03) 256-257
• 22 Kim Y. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2014: 1746-1751
• 23 Trivedi G, Hong C, Dadashzadeh ER, Handzel RM, Hochheiser H, Visweswaran S. Identifying incidental findings from radiology reports of trauma patients: an evaluation of automated feature representation methods. Int J Med Inform 2019; 129: 81-87
• 24 Shi S, Wang Q, Xu P, Chu X. Benchmarking state-of-the-art deep learning software tools. Paper presented at: 2016 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data (CCBD). Macau: IEEE; 2016
• 25 Pennington J, Socher R, Manning C. Glove: global vectors for word representation. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP);. 2014. Doha: Association for Computational Linguistics;
• 26 spaCy. Industrial-strength natural language processing in python. Available at: https://spacy.io/. Accessed September 7, 2019
• 27 Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv [csLG]. December 2014. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
• 28 Ahmad MA, Teredesai A, Eckert C. Interpretable machine learning in healthcare. Paper presented at: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI);. 2018 . Hong Kong: IEEE Computer Society:447–447
• 29 Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. arXiv [csCV]; October 2016. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02391. Accessed June 23, 2020
• 30 Hanneke S. Rates of convergence in active learning. Ann Stat 2011; 39 (01) 333-361
• 31 Lim PS, Schneider D, Sternlieb J. , et al. Process improvement for follow-up radiology report recommendations of lung nodules. BMJ Open Qual 2019; 8 (02) e000370
• 32 Pons E, Braun LMM, Hunink MGM, Kors JA. Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology 2016; 279 (02) 329-343
• 33 Zingmond D, Lenert LA. Monitoring free-text data using medical language processing. Comput Biomed Res 1993; 26 (05) 467-481
• 34 Garla V, Taylor C, Brandt C. Semi-supervised clinical text classification with Laplacian SVMs: an application to cancer case management. J Biomed Inform 2013; 46 (05) 869-875
• 35 Dutta S, Long WJ, Brown DFM, Reisner AT. Automated detection using natural language processing of radiologists recommendations for additional imaging of incidental findings. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 62 (02) 162-169
• 36 Yetisgen-Yildiz M, Gunn ML, Xia F, Payne TH. Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011; 2011: 1593-1602
• 37 Meng X, Ganoe CH, Sieberg RT, Cheung YY, Hassanpour S. Assisting radiologists with reporting urgent findings to referring physicians: a machine learning approach to identify cases for prompt communication. J Biomed Inform 2019; 93: 103169
• 38 Meng X, Heinz MV, Ganoe CH, Sieberg RT, Cheung YY, Hassanpour S. Understanding urgency in radiology reporting: identifying associations between clinical findings in radiology reports and their prompt communication to referring physicians. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 264: 1546-1547
• 39 Pham A-D, Névéol A, Lavergne T. , et al. Natural language processing of radiology reports for the detection of thromboembolic diseases and clinically relevant incidental findings. BMC Bioinformatics 2014; 15: 266
• 40 Hassanpour S, Bay G, Langlotz CP. Characterization of change and significance for clinical findings in radiology reports through natural language processing. J Digit Imaging 2017; 30 (03) 314-322
• 41 Mabotuwana T, Hall CS, Dalal S, Tieder J, Gunn ML. Extracting follow-up recommendations and associated anatomy from radiology reports. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 245: 1090-1094
• 42 Dalal S, Hombal V, Weng W-H. , et al. Determining follow-up imaging study using radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 2020; 33 (01) 121-130
• 43 Grundmeier RW, Masino AJ, Casper TC. , et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. Identification of long bone fractures in radiology reports using natural language processing to support healthcare quality improvement. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (04) 1051-1068
• 44 Sevenster M, Buurman J, Liu P, Peters JF, Chang PJ. Natural language processing techniques for extracting and categorizing finding measurements in narrative radiology reports. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (03) 600-110
• 45 Trivedi G, Dadashzadeh ER, Handzel RM, Chapman WW, Visweswaran S, Hochheiser H. Interactive NLP in clinical care: identifying incidental findings in radiology reports. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (04) 655-669