Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36(04): 386-394
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714263
Original Article

Different Faces: Different Facelift Techniques

Jacob Sedgh
1   Private Practice, Sedgh Facial Plastic Surgery, Los Angeles, California
,
Fred G. Fedok
2   Facial Plastic Surgery, Fedok Plastic Surgery, Foley, Alabama
3   Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The introduction and evolution of different rhytidectomy techniques has spawned an exciting era of facial rejuvenation in modern times. To provide patients with the best customized approach to surgery the facial aesthetic surgeon must have familiarity and understanding of the fundamental differences between these techniques. Here we set forth to provide some historical and anatomical perspective, followed by reviewing and comparing some of the key aspects of the most commonly utilized facelift techniques.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rogers BO. History of the development of aesthetic surgery. In: Regnault P, Daniel RK. , eds. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1984: 631-648
  • 2 Barrett DM, Casanueva FJ, Wang TD. Evolution of the rhytidectomy. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 2 (01) 38-44
  • 3 Marchac D. Julien Bourguet. The pioneer in aesthetic surgery of the neck. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10 (03) 363-365
  • 4 Skoog TG. Plastic surgery: the aging face. In: Skoog TG. , ed. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1974-1975
  • 5 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (01) 80-88
  • 6 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
  • 7 Baker DC. Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar face lift) with lateral SMASectomy: evolution and application. Aesthet Surg J 2001; 21 (01) 14-26
  • 8 Saylan Z. The S-lift: less is more. Aesthet Surg J 1999; 19: 406-409
  • 9 Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S. , et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 2074-2086
  • 10 Bhawan J, Andersen W, Lee J, Labadie R, Solares G. Photoaging versus intrinsic aging: a morphologic assessment of facial skin. J Cutan Pathol 1995; 22 (02) 154-159
  • 11 Kligman LH. Photoaging. Manifestations, prevention, and treatment. Dermatol Clin 1986; 4 (03) 517-528
  • 12 Henley JL, Lesnik DJ, Terk AR. Contralateral platysma suspension: an adjunct to rhytidectomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (02) 119-123
  • 13 Gassner HG, Rafii A, Young A, Murakami C, Moe KS, Larrabee Jr WF. Surgical anatomy of the face: implications for modern face-lift techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (01) 9-19
  • 14 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (01) 11-16
  • 15 Alghoul M, Codner MA. Retaining ligaments of the face: review of anatomy and clinical applications. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (06) 769-782
  • 16 Özdemir R, Kilinç H, Unlü RE, Uysal AC, Sensöz O, Baran CN. Anatomicohistologic study of the retaining ligaments of the face and use in face lift: retaining ligament correction and SMAS plication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (04) 1134-1147 , discussion 1148–1149
  • 17 Mendelson BC. Extended sub-SMAS dissection and cheek elevation. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (02) 325-339
  • 18 Jacono A, Bryant LM. Extended deep plane facelift: incorporating facial retaining ligament release and composite flap shifts to maximize midface, jawline and neck rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 527-554
  • 19 Reece EM, Pessa JE, Rohrich RJ. The mandibular septum: anatomical observations of the jowls in aging-implications for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (04) 1414-1420
  • 20 Huettner F, Rueda S, Ozturk CN. , et al. The relationship of the marginal mandibular nerve to the mandibular osseocutaneous ligament and lesser ligaments of the lower face. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (02) 111-120
  • 21 Feldman JJ. Neck lift my way: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1173-1183
  • 22 Connell BF. Contouring the neck in rhytidectomy by lipectomy and a muscle sling. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (03) 376-383
  • 23 Jacono AA, Malone MH. Characterization of the cervical retaining ligaments during subplatysmal facelift dissection and its implications. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (05) 495-501
  • 24 Fedok FG. The avoidance and management of complications, and revision surgery of the lower face and neck. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 623-634
  • 25 Fedok FG, Mittelman H. Augmenting the prejowl: deciding between fat, fillers, and implants. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (05) 513-519
  • 26 Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (04) 753-760
  • 27 Fedok FG, Sedgh J. Managing the neck in the era of the short scar face-lift. Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28 (01) 60-75
  • 28 Dedo DD. SMAS surgery versus deep-plane rhytidectomy. In: Pensak ML. , ed. Controversies in Otolaryngology. New York, NY: Thieme; 2001: 139
  • 29 Webster RC, Smith RC, Papsidero MJ, Karolow WW, Smith KF. Comparison of SMAS plication with SMAS imbrication in face lifting. Laryngoscope 1982; 92 (8, Pt 1): 901-912
  • 30 Kridel RWH, Soleymanzadeh P. The aging face (rhytidectomy). In: Bailey BJ. , ed. Head & Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 2006: 2627-2649
  • 31 Prado A, Andrades P, Danilla S, Castillo P, Leniz P. A clinical retrospective study comparing two short-scar face lifts: minimal access cranial suspension versus lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (05) 1413-1425 , discussion 1426–1427
  • 32 Kamer FM, Frankel AS. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 878-881
  • 33 Adamson PA, Dahiya R, Litner J. Midface effects of the deep-plane vs the superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (01) 9-11
  • 34 Rees TD, Liverett DM, Guy CL. The effect of cigarette smoking on skin-flap survival in the face lift patient. Plast Recontr Surg 1984; 73 (06) 911-915
  • 35 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
  • 36 Fedok FG, Chaikhoutdinov I, Garritano F. The difficult neck in facelifting. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 438-450
  • 37 Fedok FG. Another look at platysmaplasty in facelifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 36 (04) 395-403
  • 38 Wulu JA, Spiegel JH. Is deep plane rhytidectomy superior to superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication facelift?. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (08) 1741-1742